23 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. Format of HTML bookmarks file | Firefox Support Forum

      to What an abomination

  2. Apr 2023
  3. Jan 2023
  4. Feb 2022
    1. HTML a name Attribute | Jump The name attribute specifies the name of an anchor tag in html. Syntax: <a name=”value”> The name attribute is used in Anchor Tag to “jump” to a specific point on a web page. It is very useful and specially used in large pages or subdivisions.

      a name attribute Description

    2. Link to anchor on same page

      anchor on same page

  5. Jan 2022
  6. Oct 2021
  7. Sep 2021
    1. With Tag Editor, you build a query to find resources in one or more AWS Regions that are available for tagging. You can choose up to 20 individual resource types, or build a query on All resource types. Your query can include resources that already have tags, or resources that have no tags.
  8. Jul 2021
    1. I'm partial to the "Principle of Least Power" in the Axioms of Web Architecture document cited in the bibliography. (The language there better captures the thought and presents it more convincingly, in my opinion.)

      Shortcut: https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Principles.html#PLP

  9. Apr 2021
    1. Which HTML tag I should use to enclose such notes to add a semantic meaning of a note that may be useful to read at a given point of a tutorial, but is not part of the main tutorial flow?
    2. A better description is in the specification itself. Why read secondary remarks when the source is written so good?
    3. I respectfully disagree with your assessment. You are referencing the quote "It's not appropriate to use the aside element just for parentheticals, since those are part of the main flow of the document." However the OP specifically said that they are looking for a semantic element for "a note that may be useful to read at a given point of a tutorial, but is not part of the main tutorial flow". That is what "aside" is for. It's not part of the main content flow.

      That's a tough one. I can see it both ways.

    4. An admonition is a parenthetical
    5. <aside> is appropriate if the side note "could be considered separate from the content"

      From a programmer's perspective:

      • It shouldn't be in an <aside>, if it is actually directly about what is in <main>
      • An <aside> should be able to be evaluated on its own, (almost entirely) in isolation from, and not dependent on anything in, the <main> content. This could be especially important/relevant for screen readers.
    6. <aside> is not appropriate if the side note is "a parenthetical". The W3C gives no examples of what it means.
    7. In my opinion, the W3C definition is unnecessarily confusing and restrictive. The dictionary definition of aside is "a temporary departure from a main theme or topic", and the spec should just stick to that, rather than introducing subtle distinctions.
    8. I believe the accepted answer is not quite correct. According to the HTML5 working draft, the <aside> element can be used to mark up side notes in certain, but not all cases:
    9. Of course, there is no reason why you can't use <aside> for all sidenotes, if it makes your code simpler. Think of it as civil disobedience. :)
    10. The dictionary definition of aside is "a temporary departure from a main theme or topic"
  10. Aug 2018
    1. such as DOIs, which might be assigned by, for example, “crossref” or “figshare”

      I have to say publicly that this sentence makes absolutely no sense as crossref and figshare are not comparable assigning authorities. CrossRef is a registration agency of the International DOI Foundation; FigShare is not. Based upon the example given, the assigning-authority for a DOI would only ever be the set of agencies that assign DOIs. FigShare is not one of those agencies. See it is not on the list: https://www.doi.org/registration_agencies.html

  11. Jul 2018
  12. Sep 2016