Notice above, our goal
This could make more sense as "Notice our goal above was ...".
Notice above, our goal
This could make more sense as "Notice our goal above was ...".
Chapter’s
This doesn't need to be capitalized.
,
Not necessary
Lucky for us,
This may be fine. Another option is "Luckily for us,".
Above, the first five elements are
This makes more sense as "The first five elements above are ...".
,
Not necessary
elementwise
Same issue as above
elementwise
Same issue as above comment.
elementwise
This isn't a word and should be changed.
, then
and then
First
First,
elementwise
"element by element" or something else.
operators
operators:
,
Not necessary
elementwise
element by element
vector
vector, and then
occurs
occurs,
then
and then
, the
that the
TRUE and
TRUE, and
Below
Below,
,
;
,
Not necessary if the prior "an" is changed to "that an".
an
that an
, or might not,
This can be removed.
,
; while
,
;
, then
, and then
,
I think this isn't necessary.
In fact
In fact,
For example
For example,
,
Not necessary
Technically
Technically,
hoped and so
hoped, so
measures
This should be measure since columns is plural.
behavior
behavior, you
)
), the
environment and
environment, and
,
Not necessary
,
Not necessary
loblolly[1, ] all
loblolly[1, ], all
,
Not necessary
In this case
In this case,
, then
comma, and then
,
Not necessary
fame we
frame, we
tree and
tree, and columns
is in fact
is, in fact,
I think the way in the book is also okay.
Next
Next,
,
I don't think this comma is necessary.
, although if row names are desired
"names; although if row names are desired,"
Below
Below,
,
This comma isn't necessary.
,
This comma isn't necessary.
behaviors so
behaviors, so
Usually
Usually,
,
This comma isn't necessary.
listed so
listed, so
so, e.g., the
This part doesn't make sense to me.
For the log grade variable
For the log grade variable,
,
This comma isn't necessary.
,
This comma isn't necessary.
, created at the beginning of Section 4.2, was a factor
This makes more sense as "vector created at the beginning of Section 4.2 was a factor, then".
necessary, only
Maybe this should be "necessary with only truncation..." ?
1:3 and
1:3, and
c(1, 2, 1, 2) then
c(1, 2, 1, 2), then
So, for
This could be "For the first ...".
lengths but
lengths, but
lengths and
lengths, and
, then
, and then
,
Not necessary
So
I'm not sure if using conjunctions at the start of a sentence is widely accepted yet.
To access, and possibly change, a vector element’s value
This could be "To access and possibly change a vector element's value,".
,
Not necessary
elementwise
This isn't a word. Perhaps you want "together"?
,
Not necessary
,
Not necessary
Finally
Finally,
,
This might not be necessary.
(ags)
(ags), and
,
;
,
Not necessary
In this chapter
In this chapter,
PROVIDE THE URL TO BE DETERMINED
Here's another reminder.
then
and then (?)
,
This isn't necessary.
Try and
Try to
,
This isn't strictly necessary.
sciences
sciences,
objectives
objectives,
In the main project directory
In the main project directory,
project
project,
code examples
Since the first part refers to "you", this should probably read "you can run code examples offered in the book without ...".
start and
start, and
, then
, and then
then
and then
,
Not necessary
NA
There's a missing comma after this word.
,
The comma should be replaced with that
the
Should this read "are just that--- missing --- and the place ..."?
,
This could be removed and "that" inserted.
,
Not necessary
Fortunately
Fortunately,
needs then
This could read "your needs, other options...".
,
Not necessary
refereed
referred
directory
directory,
file
There should be a comma after this word.
for macOS it’s /Users/<username>, and for linux its /home/<username>.
The "its" after linux should be it's, but neither "its" is necessary.
,
Section 2.2 that the ...
,
; (?)
No space on either side of :, ::, and ::: operators
This sentence doesn't make sense.
them
Name is singular here, so this should be "it".
Or
It's still I think general practice not to start a sentence with a conjunction.
, then
expected, and then (?)
then
and then (?)
then
"and then"?
, then
This should be "run and then".
,
Not necessary
and
, and
Fortunately
Fortunately,
then
and then (?)
, then
treatment, and then
,
Not necessary
Second add treatment 2 data via points().
This should be something like "Second, we add treatment ...".
First, plot treatment 1 data
This should be something like "First, we plot treatment 1 data".
At some point
At some point,
To do this
To do this,
, rather
Maybe "details, but rather"?
,
I don't think this comma is necessary.
Ideally
Ideally,
Next
Next,
,
Not necessary
In such cases
In such cases,
,
Not necessary
www.r-project.org/about.html
This link gives a "Page not Found."
originally also called
originally called?
,
Not necessary
all important
all-important
non base
Should this be non-base?
Of course
This phrase should take a comma.
,
This comma isn't necessary.
then
I think this should be than
chapters
Missing period
For now
For now,
loaded and
loaded, and
then
I think there should be "and then" here since then isn't a conjunction.
Similarly on macOS
There should be a comma after macOS and maybe one after Similarly.
character, hence
Maybe this should be "character, and hence".
that file
that the file
, then
directory, and then
when you start RStudio
There should be a comma after this phrase and possibly between "macOS" and "when".
checks if there’s a .RData in the working directory, loads it if it exists, and your session continues where you left off.
This isn't parallel. It could instead say "checks..., loads..., and continues...".
Next time you start R or RStudio
"RStudio, it" ?
note,
I'm not sure this comma is necessary.
Unsurprisingly
This could possibly take a comma?
console
console, and
Careful, R is case sensitive.
This sentence doesn't quite make sense. Perhaps you want "Be careful as R is case sensitive."?
<-
Missing comma.
then
Maybe this should read "appears and then"?
)
Should there be a comma after the parentheses?
sign
A comma after this word makes the sentence clearer.
, you’ll
This should be "arguments, and you'll".
,
; ?
block
A comma after this word makes the sentence clearer.
Later in the book
I think this phrase could use a comma after it.
small
These two adjectives are similar enough that there should be a comma between them.
window
There should be a comma after this word.
at
Another missing URL
then
This should read "and then".
numbers
There should be a comma after this word.
,
This isn't joining two sentences, so it isn't necessary.
(ForestGEO)
There's a missing comma after these parenthesis.
high-resolution spatially-explicit
A comma between these two adjectives would help split them up.
Within a given MU
A prepositional phrase at the start of a sentence usually takes a comma, but if they're short it isn't necessary. This one is probably borderline.
,
This comma isn't necessary.
data
I'm not sure, but maybe it should read "a data recording error"?
Obviously
A comma makes sense here.
Oddly
Comma?
as well as
I'm not sure what purpose these words serve here.
,
No comma is needed here.
Clearly
There could be a comma after this word.
and,
This comma should be moved to before "and"
, and others with more complex structure,
These commas can be removed since the "and" only joins two things.
,
Technically, this comma doesn't need to be here, but it could be useful to set off the two parts of the sentence.
(2018)
There should be a comma after the parenthesis to end the phrase of book titles.
of course
This phrase often takes commas, but it seems to be up to the author.
and
"And" can be removed here. If it is, the comma after "analyst's time" should be removed as well.
Increasingly
This seem like it would fit better between professionals and assume.
First, provide an introduction to programming for those who work with forestry and ecology data. Second, guide and illustrate implementation of fundamental forestry data analysis techniques using a contemporary and powerful programming language.
These aren't really sentences as they lack a subject.
As noted in column definitions, is the tree expansion factor (TF) as defined in Section 12.3.1.
This sentence doesn't make grammatical sense.