13 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2022
    1. The truth is that our theology of sex and gender does not reflect the actual world that God has created for us.

      I disagree with this from a biblical standpoint. When God made the earth, He made male and female each. Nothing else. Anything else is something that man has made up. Intersex is an extremely rare condition. The actual world that God created for us involves only male and female. Diseases and mutations came because of the fall of man. Of course, this does not mean that intersex people are not loved and that they are not made in God's image. Anyone who says otherwise is not speaking from the Bible. However, intersex is a very rare exception and it should not be used to justify other things that God did not create.

    2. There is no such thing as an “LGBTQ Catholic,” or a “transgender Catholic,” or a “heterosexual Catholic,” as if our sexual appetites defined who we are; as if these designations described discrete communities of differing but equal integrity within the real ecclesial community, the body of Jesus Christ.

      While I disagree with what it's about, Archbishop Chaput does make a good biblical point that I agree with. You should not put a label on what kind of Christian you are. God loves everyone the same (Gal. 3:28-29).

    1. Ask permission of the ones whose lives you seek. Abide by the answer. Never take the first. Never take the last. Harvest in a way that minimizes harm.  Take only what you need and leave some for others. Use everything that you take.  Take only that which is given to you.  Share it, as the Earth has shared with you.  Be grateful.  Reciprocate the gift. Sustain the ones who sustain you, and the Earth will last forever.

      I really like these points. I think that they can apply to all aspects of life. It's a biblical principle too. 1 John 4:19 says, "We love Him, because He first loved us."

    2. If we understand the Earth as just a collection of objects, then apples and the land that offers them fall outside our circle of moral consideration. We tell ourselves that we can use them however we please, because their lives don’t matter. But in a worldview that understands them as persons, their lives matter very much.

      While I strongly believe that we should take care of the earth, I do not really like the wording of this. I fully believe that there needs to be consideration made for consuming things, but I also believe that they are meant to be consumed. God gave us the whole earth (yes, as a gift), but He told us to subdue it and gave us dominion over it. Edit: I just read the next line so I sort of take back my criticism.

  2. Oct 2022
    1. When we speak of these not as things or products or commodities, but as gifts, the whole relationship changes.

      I really like this quote. We deserve nothing and yet God gives us things. Anything that we have is a gift, and if you view everything we have as such, then we would all appreciate what we have much much more, and we would live life without feeling entitled.

    2. The revelation in that word is a treasure for me, because it is also the root word for “gift.”

      I like this line because it shows how by looking into a name for something, you can identify something new about it or something that can apply to your own life through a metaphor.

    1. How dreadful is the state of those that are daily and hourly in the danger ofthis great wrath and infinite misery! But this is the dismal case of every soul in thiscongregation that has not been born again, however moral and strict, sober andreligious, they may otherwise be.

      I actually find relevance of this quote today. Many people in modern churches simply go through the motions of being religious while never actually taking their relationship with God personally.

    2. The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, orsome loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you,

      God does not abhor anyone. He loves all people no matter how bad they are. He hates seeing people go to Hell (2 Peter 3:9). God hates sin, but He does not hate people.

    3. God has so many different unsearchable waysof taking wicked men out of the world and sending them to hell, that there isnothing to make it appear, that God had need to be at the expense of a miracle, orgo out of the ordinary course of his providence, to destroy any wicked man, at anymoment.

      While it is true that God sends evil people to Hell (assuming they have not repented of their sins and accepted Christ), if one is born again in God then they will never have to fear Hell again (John 10:28, Ephesians 1:13).Later in the sermon Edwards does state this which I just saw.

  3. Sep 2022
    1. And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have no living water, baptize into other water; and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whoever else can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before.

      I'm not sure what I think of this. In my time reading the Bible, I don't actually remember any of these extra ordinances of baptism. If it's not said in the Bible, then man put it there in which case it is not from God.

    2. Do not hesitate to give, nor complain when you give; for you shall know who is the good repayer of the hire. Do not turn away from him who is in want; rather, share all things with your brother, and do not say that they are your own.

      I really like this because I think that we put a lot of emphasis on being paid back or worrying about that when it wouldn't actually hurt us to give. It's good to help someone out and give.

    1. Turning to the relationship between religion and science, there has been a definite, though still fragile and provisional, movement towards a new and more nuanced interchange. We have begun to talk to one another on deeper levels than before, and with greater openness towards one another’s perspectives. We have begun to search together for a more thorough understanding of one another’s disciplines, with their competencies and their limitations, and especially for areas of common ground. In doing so we have uncovered important questions which concern both of us, and which are vital to the larger human community we both serve. It is crucial that this common search based on critical openness and interchange should not only continue but also grow and deepen in its quality and scope.

      I really like this paragraph in relation to the whole letter because it is really emphasizing that previous theme of a common goal bringing unity. Seeing as how God created the world and how we study the world through science, there is definitely a relationship there that should be explored. The only danger is in making science your god.

    2. This drive is essentially a movement towards the kind of unity which resist homogenization and relishes diversity. Such community is determined by a common meaning and by a shared understanding that evokes a sense of mutual involvement. Two groups which may seem initially to have nothing in common can begin to enter into community with one another by discovering a common goal, and this in turn can lead to broader areas of shared understanding and concern.

      Honestly, I don't believe that "diversity" is inherently good which seems to be what this is implying. Just that fact that things or people are different is not good in itself. However, in the second part of this exert, I do believe that a common goal brings people together more than anything.