What is three.js? three.js is the world's most popular JavaScript framework for displaying 3D content on the web.
Based on WebGL
209 Matching Annotations
- Feb 2024
-
discoverthreejs.com discoverthreejs.com
-
-
wallabag.org wallabag.org
-
- Data ownership:
- Wallabag has a paid hosted service
- But the project is open source and self-hosting should be possible
- Data ownership:
-
- Collection & Recollection:
- Looks like wallabag is sensitive to URL variations like memex
- It will double save a url with hash and without hash
- This probably will apply to Wikipedia's mobile domain and I won't know if I already saved a page on desktop/mobile
- Looks like wallabag is sensitive to URL variations like memex
- Collection & Recollection:
-
-
mymind.com mymind.com
-
- Annotations
- Text & Images
- Smart Bookmarking
- Full-text search
- Automated Tagging
- Annotations
-
Does mymind support integrations? I would like to automatically export entries to logseq/obsidian.
-
-
stephango.com stephango.com
-
Quality software from independent makers is like quality food from the farmer’s market. A jar of handmade organic jam is not the same as mass-produced corn syrup-laden jam from the supermarket. Industrial fruit jam is filled with cheap ingredients and shelf stabilizers. Industrial software is filled with privacy-invasive trackers and proprietary formats.
Does it have to be that way? Can't we optimize production process without compromising quality?
I believe fine engineering can enhance both.
I don't see anything inherent in mass production that must contradict quality.
It might be that one of the easy ways for mass production is compromising quality, but it's like any other problem: resources (time, effort, ingredients...) and quality can always be tradedoff.
-
Quality software from independent makers is like quality food from the farmer’s market. A jar of handmade organic jam is not the same as mass-produced corn syrup-laden jam from the supermarket. Industrial fruit jam is filled with cheap ingredients and shelf stabilizers. Industrial software is filled with privacy-invasive trackers and proprietary formats.
Does it have to be that way? Can't we optimize production process without compromising quality?
I believe fine engineering can enhance both.
I don't see anything inherent in mass production that must contradict quality.
It might be that one of the easy ways for mass production is compromising quality, but it's like any other problem: time and quality can always be tradedoff.
-
Quality software from independent makers is like quality food from the farmer’s market. A jar of handmade organic jam is not the same as mass-produced corn syrup-laden jam from the supermarket. Industrial fruit jam is filled with cheap ingredients and shelf stabilizers. Industrial software is filled with privacy-invasive trackers and proprietary formats.
Does it have to be that way? Can't we optimize production process without compromising quality?
I believe fine engineering can enhance both.
I don't see anything inherent in mass production that must contradict quality.
It might be that one of the easy ways for mass production is compromising quality, but it's like any other problem: time and quality can always be tradedoff.
-
It is now possible for tiny teams to make principled software that millions of people use, unburdened by investors.
How?
-