11 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2021
    1. rather than child-minding they have to open up to observation, research and experimentation by teachers who, together with children, participate in constructing a new culture of education.

      I like thinking of and wholeheartedly agree that we need to create a "new culture of education." It feels so deeply entrenched in tradition and rituals that people don't question enough! It feels daunting to move our field towards more progressive methodologies on a larger level... how do we challenge such a deeply rooted system?

    1. Such a circularity—or better, spiraling—is seen in the revisiting that is a frequent component of the learning process.

      Yes! We often notice how children's threads of learning evolve throughout the school year. Sometimes they expand in relation to previous ideas, and sometimes they branch out into new investigations. However we often we notice how we cycle back to revisit old ideas, concepts or threads of learning, with new ideas that helps us to reconsider what we previously thought about the topic... THIS is the most remarkable learning that takes place in our classrooms! When children have the confidence to stop and say "I thought I knew about x, but now that I know more, I'm not so sure... maybe I was wrong, maybe this topic deserves more attention, let me revisit my ideas to learn more!

    2. She believes that citizens have a moral obligation to invest public resources in children’s welfare and to enter into continuous and permanent knowledge cre-ation with children for her city, and society in general, to progress and improve human well-being.

      I recently watched a video of Carlina Rinaldi, where she said that women's rights are contingent of the rights of the child... WOW! There is so much to unpack with that statement, but ultimately this is very true! I see a connection in this text - having a moral obligation to invest in children's welfare, as it is so directly related to improving human (specifically women's) well being.

    3. increase their range of investigation strategies

      Teaching children thinking strategies is so important!. We shouldn't give children the answers, they need to grow up learning how and where to find them on their own, and having the confidence to ask questions and seek help from teachers when they need it. By teaching them strategies for critical thinking, analyzing and acquiring information, we empower children to understand that they have the tools to find their own answers.

  2. Sep 2021
    1. does not require "more capable peers"-only companionable peers

      Interesting, I hadn't contemplated this distinction yet... whether or not children are more inclined to problem solve with each other vs. on their own for example, even when neither is inherently more capable or skilled than the other. As an adult, I often feel more motivated to problem solve and brainstorm with a colleague for example... there is something to that interaction that helps inspire new ways of thinking.

    2. he teacher hypothesized that children would welcome the chance to decide on mealtimes for themselves.

      Interesting! We do a combination of both. Since snack time is in the middle of our morning, we've observed that the children are not always ready to be finished with their play and that some are still thoroughly engaged in their morning provocations. Thus snack time, for us, is when a child chooses. We clear a table, and the children wash hands and grab their snack as they are ready. For the most part children still decided to eat together, but not always. At lunch time, we do make a point to all eat together, as the logistics of nap time and teacher lunch breaks sort of need to happen on more of a schedule.

    3. "children up until about seven years of age communicate with each other more adequately by play than in speech, an argument can certainly be made that their childhood right to play is the same as our adult First Amendment right to free speech

      Wow! It is amazing to think of play as a RIGHT and that it is the equivalent to the right of free speech! If we think of it this way then public schools are denying our children this right as more and more kindergarten and first grade classrooms are restricting/reducing play to focus on "skills" that are required for testing.

    4. "But only if it's okay, like you won't hurt somebody and it's not safe . . . because the other person has a right to not be hurt too, right?·

      What strikes me in both the video that we just watched from the children in Reggio Emilia and this first page, is how much we underestimate children's ability to understand such nuanced social concepts. How profoundly capable they are!

    1. If it is left toferment without adult interference and without thatexcessive assistance that we sometimes give, thenit’s more advantageous to the child. We don’t wantto protect something that doesn’t need to be pro-tected.

      This really speaks to me...in a school environment, it is much more the norm to allow for children's play unfold, including during moments where they must navigate conflict. As a parent, adult intervention is much more expected, especially with younger children. It is interesting to reflect on the differences here... I often wonder how can we help parents see the value in allowing more freedom for their children... to make mistakes, to try more complicated tasks, to take risks, etc.

  3. Aug 2021
    1. process of inviting and sustaining learning

      I think about this a lot! It feels easier in a way to invite learning, but harder (to coach other teachers anyways) to sustain learning, or delve a little deeper into the children's inquiries.