34 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2025
    1. So our concepts operate as a system of representation, but wehaven’t finished the circle yet because, supposed we all shared the sameconceptual map, that’s to say we made sense of the world in roughly the samesystem of classification in our head

      I agree with Hall, just having shared categories doesn’t mean we all see things the same way. Media can use the same labels but twist the meaning depending on context. That is why representation is more than just naming, it is about how those names are used.

    2. Well, the one thing you can be certain is that,though the capacity to use concepts and to classify concepts in this way is abiological, genetic phenomenon, it is a feature of how we are constituted ashuman beings. The particular classifications that we use to classify out theworld meaningfully is not printed in anybody’s genes; it is something that islearned.

      Hall explains that while our ability to think in categories is natural, the specific labels we use are learned. Media plays a big role in teaching us how to classify the world.

    3. Suppose one says, “Yes, I can see that people are meeting now in NorthernIreland to discuss the Northern Ireland situation.” But what it means, what is themeaning of that meeting, is a very complicated thing to decide.

      Hall shows that even when we know a meeting is happening, its meaning isn’t obvious. Media doesn’t just report facts, it shapes how we understand them.

    4. So I give you the common-sense meaningto try to take it back a little bit in what I’m going to say. But then there’s anotherunderstanding of the word representation, which also plays a role in what webring to this topic because we speak of political figures as representing us insome way.

      Hall shows that “representation” can mean showing something or speaking for someone, like a politician. How does this double meaning affect how we see media figures who claim to “represent” a group?

    5. Cultural studies has paid a tremendous amount of attention in oneway or another to the centrality of representations and of the practice ofrepresentation. And media studies itself is, in an obvious sense, concerned inpart with the variety of different texts, in my instance, visual texts:representations which are transmitted by the media

      Hall shows how both cultural and media studies focus on representation, especially visual media. It is not just about what we see, but how meaning is built through images.

    6. Hall is very closely identified in media studies with an approachknown as “cultural studies,” and he starts with one of its central concepts:representation.

      Hall helped shape cultural studies. He starts with “representation” because it is how media gives meaning, not just shows things.

    1. CSI employs other emotional hooks as well. These include the pain of loss to a victim’sfamily.

      CSI doesn’t just lean on science, it taps into grief and family pain to make the story hit harder. It is emotional proof that justice matters, even when the tech feels cold.

    2. The code sheet was organized around three aspects of CSI: (1) crime statistics, forexample types of offenses and demographic details about offenders and victims; (2) crimegenre, for example elements typical of the genre such as the nature of plot development(such as personal involvement narratives); and (3) forensic science, that is, how CSI employsdialogue, narrative, or other programming features to present science.

      This coding system shows how CSI builds its authority, but how much of that “scientific” credibility is just storytelling? Are viewers being educated, or just entertained?

    3. In the earlier crimedramas, the hero was a man, usually macho, and likely to be an iconoclastic loner. Thus,gendered identity, the nature of work, and the hero’s moral authority were stitched nicelyinto the narratives of television crime dramas. But times change and so do the narratives

      CSI shifts that by making science the new hero, with lab teams and tech replacing brute force.

    4. It debuted to 17.3 million television viewers and was ranked eighth onNielsen’s weekly top 10 television programs (Armstrong, 10 October 2000).

      That stat shows CSI’s massive cultural impact right from the start. It wasn’t just popular, it was shaping public perception of forensic science from day one.

    5. Indeed, someof these challenges actually come from science in the form of DNA evidence.

      DNA is shown as flawless in CSI, but real-life cases prove it is messy, contamination, bias, and human error all play a role. Science doesn’t always mean certainty.

    1. While the aesthetics and cultural impacts of box set design and packaging certainly warrant more attention, I wish to turn to the insides of the boxes more fully, considering how the shift toward TV-on-DVD publishing changes the possibilities of serial storytelling and narrative consumption.

      Mittell shifts focus from the look of DVD box sets to their deeper impact, how they change the way stories are told and consumed.

    2. As Jonathan Gray discusses regarding the Lord of the Rings DVDs, boxed sets recontextualize the ephemeral media text into a collectable media object, sized perfectly for the bookshelf and appropriate for placing next to their literary siblings. Just this placement redefines our video collections from the archived flow of homemade videotapes to authorized and legitimate published cultural objects.

      Does turning media into collectible objects change how we value them, as stories, as status symbols, or as part of our identity?

    3. The 2000s have been a remarkable decade of transformation in American television.

      The rise of DVD box sets changed everything, fans could binge The West Wing or Buffy the Vampire Slayer without waiting for weekly broadcasts.

    1. Being self-contained, the segment tends to exhaust its material,providing its own climax which is the culmination of the material of thesegment. It is a characteristic of soap operas that they withhold theclimactic revelation or action to the end of the segment and the end of theepisode. This reaches a purely formal perfection with a series likeCrossroads where the climactic revelation is followed directly by thecredits (entering, emblematically, from every possible direction), and isthen repeated as a kind of coda: two characters in frozen face-to-faceconfrontation with one delivering a line that summarises the previoussegment.

      Does this repeated structure make the drama more addictive, or does it risk becoming predictable over time?

    2. Cinema narration has a strong internal dynamic, a movement from aninitial equilibrium that is disrupted towards a new harmony that is the endof the fiction.

      Ellis says cinema stories move from balance to disruption to resolution, a full arc in one sitting. In The Dark Knight, Gotham starts in uneasy peace, chaos erupts with the Joker, and ends with Batman taking the blame to restore order. This kind of complete arc is harder to find in TV serials, which often stretch conflict across seasons.

    3. Broadcast TV is capable ofadopting a filmic mode of narration as a kind of borrowing from an alreadyestablished medium. This will almost always be announced as such: by theform of the TV movie (often a ‘pilot’ for a series), or by the designation ofa programme as a prestigious cultural event.

      Does using a cinematic style make TV feel more serious or high-quality, or does it blur the line between everyday viewing and cultural events?

  2. blog.richmond.edu blog.richmond.edu
    1. Williams’s claim that “an increasing variability andmiscellaneity of public communications is evidentlypart of a whole social experience” is more apt todaythan ever (1974, 88). The televisual flow that Williamsanalyzed in the 1970s was experienced through a citi-zenship engaged by viewing and listening to mediatedlocal and national spaces. However, the hegemonicflows of the early twenty-first century (in the mosttechnologically advanced societies) converge upon therelatively more instrumentalized “user,” a node in seem-ingly endless online networks. Entry into the mediatedcitizenship of Williams’s 1970s was gained through theprivate achievement of material class markers (privatehome, TV set, leisure time, etc.)

      Kompare updates Williams’s idea by showing how today’s media flow turns viewers into “users” who are part of endless online networks.

    2. Over the past forty years, the concept of flow hasbeen used in media studies as a conceptually influential,but ultimately limited model for the textual analysisof television content, or more broadly as a metaphorfor postmodern culture, of which television is the ul-timate exemplar.

      Kompare says flow has been a powerful but limited way to study TV and postmodern culture. Think of how Netflix auto-plays the next episode, it creates a flow that feels endless, but it doesn’t explain how viewers jump between platforms like TikTok, YouTube, or Instagram. That’s where the old model of flow starts to fall short.

    1. But the impulse to go on watching seems more widespreadthan this kind of organisation would alone explain. It is signifi-cant that there has been steady pressure, not only from thetelevision providers but from many viewers, for an extension ofviewing hours. In Britain, until recently, television was basicallyan evening experience, with some brief offerings in the middleof the day, and with morning and afternoon hours, except atweekends, used for schools and similar broadcasting. There isnow a rapid development of morning and afternoon ‘pro-grammes’ of a general kind.2 In the United States it is alreadypossible to begin watching at six o’clock in the morning, seeone’s first movie at eight-thirty, and so on in a continuous flow,with the screen never blank, until the late movie begins at oneo’clock the following morning.

      Williams points out that viewers themselves, not just networks, push for longer TV hours. In the U.S., TV can run nonstop from early morning to late at night, creating a constant flow of content.

    2. In an American radio programme listing, which is beforeme as I write, there is a further specialisation: the predominantlymusical programmes are briefly characterised, by wavelength, as‘rock’, ‘country’, ‘classical’, ‘nostalgic’ and so on.1 In one sensethis can be traced as a development of programming: extensionsof the service have brought further degrees of rationalisation andspecialisation.

      Does this kind of labeling help listeners find what they want, or does it limit how we explore new genres?

    3. ‘Home’,‘Light’ and ‘Third’, in British radio, were the eventual names forwhat were privately described and indeed generally understoodas ‘general’, ‘popular’ and ‘educated’ broadcasting.

      Why media companies use softer labels instead of direct ones, does it change how audiences see themselves?

    4. The magazine, invented as a specificform in the early eighteenth century, was designed as a miscel-lany, mainly for a new and expanding and culturally inexperi-enced middle-class audience. The modern newspaper, from theeighteenth century but very much more markedly from thenineteenth century, became a miscellany, not only of news itemsthat were often essentially unrelated, but of features, anecdotes,drawings, photographs and advertisements

      Williams explains that magazines and newspapers were created as mixed collections of content, news, stories, ads, for middle-class readers. This helped prepare audiences for TV’s nonstop mix of shows, ads, and images.

    5. In all communications systems before broadcasting the essen-tial items were discrete. A book or a pamphlet was taken andread as a specific item

      Before TV, media like books were separate and complete, you chose one, read it, and finished it. Williams is showing how TV changed that by creating a nonstop stream instead of single items.

  3. drive.google.com drive.google.com
    1. Thus the sitcom, around 1970, shifted away from the "one dramaticconflict series" model of The Beverly Hillbillies and toward an expandedconception of the domestic comedy. 1

      Around 1970, sitcoms like All in the Family replaced single-conflict formats with deeper family dynamics and social issues, showing the shift toward richer domestic comedy.

    2. Of course, the audience itself no doubt changed from the late 1960s tothe mid-1980s-specifically, the baby boomers matured during this period. And of course, cultural changes no doubt influenced the genericshifts in the sitcom. But they did not directly cause the genre to change.

      If cultural shifts and audience aging influenced sitcoms, why didn’t they directly cause the genre to change?

    3. Drawing on Aristotle, the literary critic Northrop Frye attempted inthe 1950s to further develop the idea of classifying literature into typesand categories that he called genres and modes.

      Just as Aristotle classified living beings by essential traits, genre theory, developed by Frye and applied by Feuer, uses taxonomy to organize scripted TV shows by shared narrative features, helping audiences and producers make sense of meaning and structure.

    4. Taxonomy dissects the general category of "animal" into a systembased on perceived similarity and difference according to certain distinctive features of the various phyla and specie

      How does television genre act like biological taxonomy—sorting scripted shows into categories based on shared traits like setting, tone, and character types, just as animals are grouped by species and phyla?

    5. The term genre is simply the French word for type orkind.

      The Office is a modern example of the sitcom genre, using mockumentary style and workplace humor to meet audience expectations.

  4. Aug 2025
    1. e emergence of the term “family room” in the postwar period is aperfect example of the importance aaed to organizing household spacesaround ideals of family togetherness

      The “family room” was made to bring everyone together. It is kind of like how we hang out in the living room today to relax or talk.

    2. e more melodramatic socialproblem films su as Come Back Little Sheba (1952) and A Hatful of Rain(1957) were aracter studies of emotionally unstable, oen drug-dependent,family men. S

      These movies showed men who were struggling emotionally or with addiction. It’s interesting that TV and film in the 1950s didn’t just show perfect families, they also showed serious problems inside the home.

    3. e transition from wartime to postwar life thus resulted in a set ofideological and social contradictions concerning the construction of genderand the family unit

      After the war, people were confused about what men and women were supposed to do at home. Families were expected to look perfect, but real life didn’t always match that.