danah boyd
Engaging with boyd's counterargument
danah boyd
Engaging with boyd's counterargument
So this isn’t just a guide to spotting when something is fake. It’s a system for slowing down and thinking about information — whether that information is true, false, or something in between.
The how of "emotional skepticism"
the kind of thing that’s easy to furiously retweet without thinking.
Connection to Haidt and Rose-Stockwell's notion of the "outrage machine"
Though Americans who turn to social media appear to be more aware of unproven claims and exposed to more misinformation, this doesn’t translate to more concern about the effects made-up news can have. In a November 2019 survey, this group was actually less likely than most others to be concerned about the effects made-up news could have on the 2020 election.
They don't care. Why?
For example, among U.S. adults overall, 59% said they distrusted Facebook as a place for political news, compared with just 15% who said they trusted the social networking site.
Connection to Buzzfeed Survey (Silverman interview)
Most notably, they are the youngest group by a considerable margin – nearly half of the adults who turned mostly to social media are under 30 (48%), compared with 21% of those who turned to news websites or apps, and even fewer of those who said they mostly turned to other platforms like cable television or print.
Generational differences
Moderation is largely handled by paid workers
For-profit v. non-profit media sources--different editorial practices that affect reliability/credibility of information
that posts should have a neutral point of view, they should treat each other with respect and that there are no firm rules.
Tenets of Wikipedia: 5 pillars