705 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2018
    1. he king eventually decreed the “New Laws” in 1542, which prohibited slavery of native peoples in Spanish-held lands of the Americas, and also ended transference of slaves by family inheritance.

      Precipitated slave trade from Africa.

    1. Presently we discovered two or three villages, and the people all came down to the shore, calling out to us, and giving thanks to God. Some brought us water, and others victuals: others seeing that I was not disposed to land, plunged into the sea and swam out to us, and we perceived that they interrogated us if we had come from heaven. An old man came on board my boat; the others, both men and women cried with loud voices–“Come and see the men who have come from heavens. Bring them victuals and drink.” There came many of both sexes, every one bringing something, giving thanks to God, prostrating themselves on the earth, and lifting up their hands to heaven. They called out to us loudly to come to land, but I was apprehensive on account of a reef of rocks, which surrounds the whole island, although within there is depth of water and room sufficient for all the ships of Christendom, with a very narrow entrance. There are some shoals withinside, but the water is as smooth as a pond. It was to view these parts that I set out in the morning, for I wished to give a complete relation to your Highnesses, as also to find where a fort might be built. I discovered a tongue of land which appeared like an island though it was not, but might be cut through and made so in two days; it contained six houses. I do not, however, see the necessity of fortifying the place, as the people here are simple in war-like matters, as your Highnesses will see by those seven which I have ordered to be taken and carried to Spain in order to learn our language and return, unless your Highnesses should choose to have them all transported to Castile, or held captive in the island. I could conquer the whole of them with fifty men, and govern them as I pleased. Near the islet I have mentioned were groves of trees, the most beautiful I have ever seen, with their foliage as verdant as we see in Castile in April and May. There were also many streams. After having taken a survey of these parts, I returned to the ship, and setting sail, discovered such a number of islands that I knew not which first to visit; the natives whom I had taken on board informed me by signs that there were so many of them that they could not be numbered; they repeated the names of more than a hundred. I determined to steer for the largest, which is about five leagues from San Salvador; the others were some at a greater, and some at a less distance from that island. They are all very level, without mountains, exceedingly fertile and populous, the inhabitants living at war with one another, although a simple race, and with delicate bodies.

      Columbus' journal assumes an anthropological approach, but all the time veers into this very blunt geopolitical language, too.

      Consider the layers of possible relationships just in this one statement: learning our language, holding captive, conquering, seizing control and occupying the island.

    2. As I saw that they were very friendly to us, and perceived that they could be much more easily converted to our holy faith by gentle means than by force, I presented them with some red caps, and strings of beads to wear upon the neck, and many other trifles of small value, wherewith they were much delighted, and became wonderfully attached to us. Afterwards they came swimming to the boats, bringing parrots, balls of cotton thread, javelins, and many other things which they exchanged for articles we gave them, such as glass beads, and hawk’s bells; which trade was carried on with the utmost good will. But they seemed on the whole to me, to be a very poor people. They all go completely naked, even the women, though I saw but one girl. All whom I saw were young, not above thirty years of age, well made, with fine shapes and faces; their hair short, and coarse like that of a horse’s tail, combed toward the forehead, except a small portion which they suffer to hang down behind, and never cut. Some paint themselves with black, which makes them appear like those of the Canaries, neither black nor white; others with white, others with red, and others with such colors as they can find. Some paint the face, and some the whole body; others only the eyes, and others the nose. Weapons they have none, nor are acquainted with them, for I showed them swords which they grasped by the blades, and cut themselves through ignorance. They have no iron, their javelins being without it, and nothing more than sticks, though some have fish-bones or other things at the ends. They are all of a good size and stature, and handsomely formed. I saw some with scars of wounds upon their bodies, and demanded by signs the of them; they answered me in the same way, that there came people from the other islands in the neighborhood who endeavored to make prisoners of them, and they defended themselves. I thought then, and still believe, that these were from the continent. It appears to me, that the people are ingenious, and would be good servants and I am of opinion that they would very readily become Christians, as they appear to have no religion. They very quickly learn such words as are spoken to them. If it please our Lord, I intend at my return to carry home six of them to your Highnesses, that they may learn our language. I saw no beasts in the island, nor any sort of animals except parrots.” These are the words of the Admiral.

      First concern is whether a war will have to break out, but the Admiral sees this, finally, as a conversion opportunity.

      He then goes into detail, in the next passages, about the dress and customs of the Taíno people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ta%C3%ADno

      With this stroke, indigenous history and customs is erased.

      I think it's important to keep in mind that this ideological work - suppressing the cultures of the native peoples - is just as necessary a part of the eventual conquest of the Caribbean and North and South America as the diseases and the military and economic might of the settling forces.

    3. Presently they descried people, naked, and the Admiral landed in the boat, which was armed, along with Martin Alonzo Pinzon, and Vincent Yanez his brother, captain of the Nina. The Admiral bore the royal standard, and the two captains each a banner of the Green Cross, which all the ships had carried; this contained the initials of the names of the King and Queen each side of the cross, and a crown over each letter Arrived on shore, they saw trees very green many streams of water, and diverse sorts of fruits.

      First notice of native peoples.

    4. Thursday, 11 October.

      LAND!

    5. Whereas, Most Christian, High, Excellent, and Powerful Princes, King and Queen of Spain and of the Islands of the Sea, our Sovereigns

      Wow, Ferdinand and Isabella, you are SO AWESOME!

    1. minding her poetry

      Throughout the poem, Chin is vacillating between different binary oppositions -- China and America, East and West, high culture (poetry) and pop culture (TV and film) -- and here she's drawing attention once again to the ways that her identity was in a kind of liminal space. How is "minding her poetry" relevant to this cultural space of neither/nor?

      What language can postcolonial criticism offer us to think about Chin's poem?

    2. mighty white whale, or the jaws of a metaphysical Godzilla,

      Juxtaposition of Herman Melville's Moby Dick and the Japanese film Godzilla.

    3. survived by everbody and forgotten by all.

      Savage, eh?

    4. The fact that this death is also metaphorical

      Here Chin announces her own metaphorical death in explicit terms before turning to write her own eulogy in the final stanza.

      We might call this part of the poem a "metapoem" or, at least, a meta-commentary on poetry.

      Come to think of it, what is Chin saying about poetry and the role of poetry in "How I Got That Name"?

    5. a plump pomfret simmering in my juices

      Look up "pomfret." What kind of fish is it? How might choosing a different kind of fish change these lines?

    6. his kiosk

      Why "kiosk"?

    7. We have no inner resources!
    8. “Santa Barbara”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Barbara_(TV_series)

      Why does Chin juxtapose a popular TV show with modernist poetry like Williams' and Berryman's?

    9. red wheelbarrow,
    10. “Model Minority”

      What is the "Model Minority myth" and how does it affect Asian-Americans particularly?

    11. “kitchen deity.”
    12. somewhere between Angel Island and the sea
  2. Dec 2017
    1. For eighteen hundred years, though perchance I have no right to say it, the New Testament has been written; yet where is the legislator who has wisdom and practical talent enough to avail himself of the light which it sheds on the science of legislation?

      Whoa.

    2. It is there that the fugitive slave, and the Mexican prisoner on parole, and the Indian come to plead the wrongs of his race should find them; on that separate, but more free and honorable, ground, where the State places those who are not with her, but against her- the only house in a slave State in which a free man can abide with honor.

      So many quotables.

    3. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison.

      Who's ready to die on this hill? I agree 100% and we know folks are unjustly imprisoned.

      So, are we the people Thoreau's calling out above?

    4. Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it. It is only expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail.

      Do we agree with Thoreau on voting?

    5. There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing; who even postpone the question of freedom to the question of free trade

      Thoreau swinging on everyone

    6. when a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law, I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize.

      🔥

    7. A very few- as heroes, patriots, martyrs, reformers in the great sense, and men- serve the state with their consciences also, and so necessarily resist it for the most part; and they are commonly treated as enemies by it.

      Thoreau setting up anti-institutional forces as heroes...

    8. The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailers, constables, posse comitatus, etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw or a lump of dirt.

      Yikes! Imagine an intellectual dragging the military like this in contemporary America? He'd be in worse shape than Kaepernick right now.

    9. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right.

      A line that MLK no doubt loved.

    10. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?- in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable?

      Hmm....democracy is best for Thoreau only dealing w/ questions of expediency....which are?

      And, yeah, sign me up for a government based on the rule of conscience ... but whose conscience?

    11. I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it.

      Similar to Roger Williams' critique.

      Also, is this a plausible standard? I'll be honest, the government has a lot of work to do to command my respect -- but that work will always look different for different people, right? How do we navigate those divides?

    12. This American government- what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity,

      Bureaucracies first goal is to sustain themselves.

    13. That government is best which governs not at all”; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have

      What does this look like? Does it depend on the definition of "government"?

    1. Thoreau questions how effective someone inside the system can reinvent the system while relying upon it. Making a claim that one cannot change what they rely upon, he challenges the reader to act in a manner of civil disobedience, and to not pay their taxes and to not partake in the unjust larger government, while still acting civilly in your and other communities.

      Great!

  3. Nov 2017
    1. I know what the caged bird feels! I know why the caged bird beats his wing     Till its blood is red on the cruel bars;

      So incredibly powerful -- what's it like to be caged in an unable to express your true self, to pursue your hopes, dreams, and desires?

    1. Why should the world be over-wise,

      What does it mean to be "over-wise"? Too knowledgeable of the pain?

    2. human guile;

      Thank you for providing vocab links!

    1. the detached face that so many African Slaves felt necessary to wear in front of their Masters or Owners, as well as how many people must put up a front to others

      Also, the kind of attitude black people had to carry in a white-dominated society -- "masking" inner pain at the harsh brutalities of racism.

      Also, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_consciousness

    2. We Wear the Mask is sometimes referred to as a “muted protest” poem because it is vaguely implied and never openly stated what the message is.

      Great line!

    3. enslaved

      He was born during Reconstruction!

    1. Why, there’s John at the door! It is no use, young man, you can’t open it! How he does call and pound! Now he’s crying for an axe. It would be a shame to break down that beautiful door!

      John's attempt to "save" her. Why doesn't he listen to her?

    2. ’ve got a rope up here that even Jennie did not find. If that woman does get out, and tries to get away, I can tie her! But I forgot I could not reach far without anything to stand on!

      She's going to capture and tie the woman up out of the wall.

    3. It is the same woman, I know, for she is always creeping, and most women do not creep by daylight.

      Women don't creep in daylight?

    4. Then in the very bright spots she keeps still, and in the very shady spots she just takes hold of the bars and shakes them hard. And she is all the time trying to climb through. But nobody could climb through that pattern—it strangles so; I think that is why it has so many heads.

      Why's a woman trapped in there? It's a heavy-handed metaphor, no?

    5. It is the strangest yellow, that wallpaper! It makes me think of all the yellow things I ever saw—not beautiful ones like buttercups, but old foul, bad yellow things.

      Yellow-ness

    6. Then she said that the paper stained everything it touched, that she had found yellow smooches on all my clothes and John’s, and she wished we would be more careful! Did not that sound innocent? But I know she was studying that pattern, and I am determined that nobody shall find it out but myself!

      The yellow is now staining everything? Why is it deteriorating?

    7. The outside pattern is a florid arabesque, reminding one of a fungus

      Hmm....the pattern is now completely different?

    8. “Better in body perhaps”—I began, and stopped short, for he sat up straight and looked at me with such a stern, reproachful look that I could not say another word.

      Better in BODY -- why is this all that matters?

    9. It is so hard to talk with John about my case, because he is so wise, and because he loves me so.

      John is wise and loving yet cannot understand her?

    10. He says no one but myself can help me out of it, that I must use my will and self-control and not let any silly fancies run away with me. There’s one comfort, the baby is well and happy, and does not have to occupy this nursery with the horrid wallpaper. If we had not used it that blessed child would have! What a fortunate escape! Why, I wouldn’t have a child of mine, an impressionable little thing, live in such a room for worlds.

      What's this section now about raising a child?

      Mary is the classic maternal figure who cares for the baby.

    11. and has me take cod-liver oil and lots of tonics and things, to say nothing of ale and wine and rare meat.

      Science looks to resolve ailments through chemical cures? Restore order by treating it medically.

      What about the soul?

    12. I don’t know why I should write this. I don’t want to. I don’t feel able.

      Why does she continually doubt her capacity to write?

    13. I exhaust myself in trying to distinguish the order of its going in that direction. They have used a horizontal breadth for a frieze, and that adds wonderfully to the confusion.

      Again, there is no order -- something that can't be categorized but only imagined.

    14. delirium tremens—
    15. Romanesque
    16. I determine for the thousandth time that I will follow that pointless pattern to some sort of a conclusion. I know a little of the principle of design, and I know this thing was not arranged on any laws of radiation, or alternation, or repetition, or symmetry, or anything else that I ever heard of. It is repeated, of course, by the breadths, but not otherwise.

      It has not principle of design -- no rational pattern?

    17. There comes John’s sister. Such a dear girl as she is, and so careful of me! I must not let her find me writing. She is a perfect, and enthusiastic housekeeper, and hopes for no better profession. I verily believe she thinks it is the writing which made me sick!

      John's sister and domestic duties.

    18. John has cautioned me not to give way to fancy in the least. He says that with my imaginative power and habit of story-making a nervous weakness like mine is sure to lead to all manner of excited fancies, and that I ought to use my will and good sense to check the tendency. So I try.

      Is rationality/reason v. fancy/imagination gendered?

    19. But he is right enough about the beds and windows and things.

      She keeps finding little ways to redeem him as "right."

    20. John does not know how much I really suffer. He knows there is no reason to suffer, and that satisfies him.

      Wow...what do we do with this? His attempt to locate blame on her.

    21. So I will let it alone and talk about the house.

      Interesting voice. Who's the audience?

    22. My brother is also a physician, and also of high standing, and he says the same thing

      Medical field/discourse is constructed around male wants and needs.

    23. John is practical in the extreme. He has no patience with faith, an intense horror of superstition, and he scoffs openly at any talk of things not to be felt and seen and put down in figures. John is a physician, and perhaps—(I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind)—perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster.

      John is the epitome of Enlightenment rationalism, an MD, and yet that's the reason she's not well...

      What does this mean? Is this the new symbol of patriarchy? (Not the superstitious witchburners of yesteryear?)

    24. John laughs at me, of course, but one expects that in marriage.

      Ouch!

    25. I would say a haunted house, and reach the height of romantic felicity—but that would be asking too much of fate!

      Hahahaha -- her existence is so cliched as to be a joke.

    26. mere ordinary people like John and myself

      Recognizing social class.

    1. It must be confessed, that Miss Linwood violated the strict rules that governed her contemporaries. She was not a lady of saws and precedents. But if she sometimes too impulsively threw open the door of her heart, there was nothing there exposed that could stain her cheek with a blush. We would by no means recommend an imitation of her spontaneous actions. Those only can afford them to whom they are spontaneous.

      Isabella violated decorum of an upper class woman by speaking out her emotions without reserve.

    2. I’ll tell you how we live, sir”—the earnest tone of his voice attracted attention—”we live on salt beef, brown bread, and beans, when we can get them; and when we cannot, some of us fast, and some share their horses’ messes.”

      American identity already posed as practical vs. the extravagance of the British.

    3. Isabella’s tactics were baffled by a counter-movement.

      Social situation using the language of war.

    4. Strange as it may appear to those who have grown up with the rectified notions of the present day, she for the first time perceived the folly of measuring American society by a European standard—of casting it in an old and worn mould—of permitting its vigorous youth to be cramped and impaired by transmitted manacles and shackles. Her fine mind was like the perfectly organized body, that wanted but to be touched by fire from Heaven to use all its faculties freely and independently.

      This is the nineteenth-century understanding of the Revolution, of course, revised for its time.

      Still -- it is fascinating that a national awakening also comes with a new kind of social understanding for Isabella.

    5. Isabella bowed and smiled too, but not graciously; her pride was offended. A new light had broken upon her, and she began to see old subjects in a fresh aspect.

      Isabella gets woke with how her family friends -- loyalists -- treat the revolutionaries.

    6. roturiers
    7. a fright, I grant, very like the rustic little affair your sister Bessie used to wear, Lee; and absolute treason in substituting la vendange, a Bacchante concern, introduced by the Queen of France, the patroness of the rebel cause

      You see the revolutionary conflict inscribed in clothing and fashion, too.

    8. Queen Charlotte bonnet
    9. Yes, it is; and it should be so, if, as some poets imagine, there is a mysterious correspondence and affinity between the outward world and pure spirits.

      Anticipating Emerson?

    10. For the first time an American feeling shot athwart her mind, and, like a sunbeam falling on Memnon’s statue, it elicited music to one ear at least.

      Hmm...why, now, did "an American feeling" come to Isabella?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memnon_(mythology)

    11. England was so much the Jerusalem of the loyal colonists, the holy city towards which they always worshiped

      Fascinating -- since, for the Puritans, America was supposedly the new divine city, right?

    12. Sir Henry, after addressing each of his guests with that official and measured politeness that marks the great man’s exact estimate of the value of each nod, smile,

      Burn.

    13. Curtius
    14. Why, he may be an officer, who, under the disguise of a servant, may be a very efficient emissary for Mr. Washington.

      Everyone's worried that everyone else might be spies for rebels/tories.

      What's the radical suspicion say about the characters? About the genre of fiction, perhaps?

    15. to enact a part—a difficult task to Isabella Linwood

      Hmmm...she's too honest to act?

    16. God bless you, dear brother,” she concluded

      Okay, Herbert is her brother -- is he speaking of himself in 3rd-person?

    17. would have thrown her arms around him but for Eliot’s intervention

      Isabella wants Herbert, Eliot wants Isabella?

    1. The two sides are referred throughout the novel as the Tories and the Rebels

      Very helpful note, thanks.

    2. While the Linwoods are loyal to the British, the Lees are on the revolution side

      Gasp! Loyalists -- like ol' Rip V-dubs!

    1. Tecumseh’s Speech to the Osages

      Some theoretical discussion questions:

      Why don't we learn of Tecumseh?

      Why do we rarely learn that Natives, at times, did fight back?

      Why would Tecumseh make such a blanket statement about "white men"?

    2. My people wish for peace; the red men all wish for peace; but where the white people are, there is no peace for them, except it be on the bosom of our mother.

      This interesting way that "Whiteness" is made into the issue.

    3. drive us back, as they would wolves and panthers

      The way indigineous people were reduced to subhuman.

    4. When the white men first set foot on our grounds, they were hungry; they had no place on which to spread their blankets, or to kindle their fires. They were feeble; they could do nothing for themselves

      Reverses the narrative going all the way back to Columbus?

    1. We passed the Setting Sun – Or rather – He passed Us –

      Why this turnaround qualification? The narrator corrects the usual turn of phrase?

    2. Gazing Grain

      Why's the grain looking on them?

    3. I had put away My labor and my leisure too, For His Civility

      Why one's labor and leisure? Are these facts of life not important in the face of Death?

    4. The Carriage held but just Ourselves – And Immortality.

      Riding in a carriage with Death and Immortality.

    1. Yet – never – in Extremity, It asked a crumb – of me.

      http://edl.byu.edu/webster/term/2321696

      Unlike a literal bird, hope doesn't ask anything of the person it is uplifting....?

      Hmm...does this make her skeptical of it?

    2. chillest

      Not chilliest, chillest?

    3. sings the tune without the words

      Like a bird would, it communicates not through language but through affective experience?

    4. feathers

      http://edl.byu.edu/webster/term/2239221

      Could be a bird that's ready to take flight. What else do feathers do on a bird? Are feathers forever?

      How about meaning of feather as an empty ornament?

    5. “Hope” is the thing with feathers Previous

      Dudes, we should use this to close read Dickinson's language: http://edl.byu.edu/.

    1. https://www.shmoop.com/because-i-could-not-stop-for-death/  

      Three things: 1) I would introduce this analysis in narrative form, rather than bullet points 2) I would veer a little away from simply reiterating the shmoop reading, although it's good that you cited it. 3) There's a lot of context missing from this introduction. Where was this poem published? How did it change from the manuscript? What does the symbol of death have to do with Dickinson's life and other works?

    1. When she was done, she had almost 800 poems. However, no one was aware these poems had existed until after her death.

      This is truly amazing. If you want to see what her poems ACTUALLY looked like, since most of them were in unpublished manuscript form, this website is awesome: http://www.edickinson.org/works

    2. When Dickinson was eighteen years old, her family became friends with a man named Benjamin Franklin Newton. Newton was a young attorney and someone Dickinson describes as “fatherly.” Although Dickinson and Newton were not romantic, Newton had thought highly of him and considered him to be a tutor, preceptor, and even master. It is thought that Newton had showed Dickinson writings of William Wordsworth and Ralph Waldo Emerson. After reading her work, Newton thought very highly of Dickinson. Later, Newton was dying of tuberculosis and wrote her, saying “he would like to live until she achieved the greatness he foresaw.” After Newton had passed, she had found out so did her principal Leonard Humphrey. Humphrey had died of a brain congestion at age 25.

      This is interesting. What's funny is that it's usually Thomas Wentworth Higginson, her last "mentor" who ended up editing her poems after her death, who's usually talked about as most important to Dickinson's development.

    3. In her teenage years, Dickinson had studied at a school called Amherst Academy. Just two years before she attended, it was an all boys school.

      Great observation. It's important to note Dickinson's unique position here. She's born and bred in New England -- but not Boston, rural western MA. That's a really big difference, even today, but especially in the 19th century. She wasn't a cosmopolitan, but she was educated -- and in the liberal arts tradition that you are all now participating in!

  4. Oct 2017
    1. For the present, it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race. Is it not astonishing that, while we are ploughing, planting, and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses, constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, copper, silver and gold; that, while we are reading, writing and ciphering, acting as clerks, merchants and secretaries, having among us lawyers, doctors, ministers, poets, authors, editors, orators and teachers; that, while we are engaged in all manner of enterprises common to other men, digging gold in California, capturing the whale in the Pacific, feeding sheep and cattle on the hill-side, living, moving, acting, thinking, planning, living in families as husbands, wives and children, and, above all, confessing and worshipping the Christian’s God, and looking hopefully for life and immortality beyond the grave, we are called upon to prove that we are men!

      It's clear that we consider black people to be PEOPLE when they're acting in the world, but not under the law.

    2. But I fancy I hear some one of my audience say, “It is just in this circumstance that you and your brother abolitionists fail to make a favorable impression on the public mind. Would you argue more, and denounce less; would you persuade more, and rebuke less; your cause would be much more likely to succeed.” But, I submit, where all is plain there is nothing to be argued. What point in the anti slavery creed would you have me argue? On what branch of the subject do the people of this country need light? Must I undertake to prove that the slave is a man? That point is conceded already. Nobody doubts it. The slaveholders themselves acknowledge it in the enactment of laws for their government. They ac knowledge it when they punish disobedience on the part of the slave. There are seventy-two crimes in the State of Virginia which, if committed by a black man (no matter how ignorant he be), subject him to the punishment of death; while only two of the same crimes will subject a white man to the like punishment. What is this but the acknowledgment that the slave is a moral, intellectual, and responsible being? The manhood of the slave is conceded. It is admitted in the fact that Southern statute books are covered with enactments forbidding, under severe fines and penalties, the teaching of the slave to read or to write. When you can point to any such laws in reference to the beasts of the field, then I may con sent to argue the manhood of the slave. When the dogs in your streets, when the fowls of the air, when the cattle on your hills, when the fish of the sea, and the reptiles that crawl, shall be unable to distinguish the slave from a brute, then will I argue with you that the slave is a man!

      He actually takes on the argument that he would catch more flies with honey - the abolitionists are too mean, denounce too much, they're too radical, etc.

      But then, he asks, what should my tone be? Look at the the size of the injustices and tell me..

    3. My subject, then, fellow-citizens, is American slavery. I shall see this day and its popular characteristics from the slave’s point of view. Standing there identified with the American bondman, making his wrongs mine, I do not hesitate to declare, with all my soul, that the character and conduct of this nation never looked blacker to me than on this 4th of July! Whether we turn to the declarations of the past, or to the professions of the present, the conduct of the nation seems equally hideous and revolting. America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future. Standing with God and the crushed and bleeding slave on this occasion, I will, in the name of humanity which is outraged, in the name of liberty which is fettered, in the name of the constitution and the Bible which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery-the great sin and shame of America! “I will not equivocate; I will not excuse”; I will use the severest language I can command; and yet not one word shall escape me that any man, whose judgment is not blinded by prejudice, or who is not at heart a slaveholder, shall not confess to be right and just.

      FIRE! His subject on this day is American slavery and he's not taking any prisoners.

    4. Fellow-citizens, above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions! whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are, to-day, rendered more intolerable by the jubilee shouts that reach them. If I do forget, if I do not faithfully remember those bleeding children of sorrow this day, “may my right hand forget her cunning, and may my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth!”

      Keeps returning to the "fellow citizens" address.

    5. “By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down. Yea! we wept when we remembered Zion. We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. For there, they that carried us away captive, required of us a song; and they who wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. How can we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land? If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth.”

      PSalm 137

    6. But such is not the state of the case. I say it with a sad sense of the disparity between us. I am not included within the pale of this glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The blessings in which you, this day, rejoice, are not enjoyed in common.-The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity and independence, bequeathed by your fa thers, is shared by you, not by me. The sunlight that brought light and healing to you, has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony. Do you mean, citizens, to mock me, by asking me to speak to-day? If so, there is a parallel to your conduct. And let me warn you that it is dangerous to copy the example of a nation whose crimes, towering up to heaven, were thrown down by the breath of the Almighty, burying that nation in irrevocable ruin! I can to-day take up the plaintive lament of a peeled and woe-smitten people!

      Putting distance between himself and the audience.

    7. Fellow-citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here to-day? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us? and am I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, and to confess the benefits and express devout gratitude for the blessings resulting from your independence to us?

      TURN: Douglass now begins to empty out the celebration by pointing to its hypocrisy.

    8. We have to do with the past only as we can make it useful to the present and to the future. To all inspiring motives, to noble deeds which can be gained from the past, we are welcome. But now is the time, the important time. Your fathers have lived, died, and have done their work, and have done much of it well. You live and must die, and you must do your work. You have no right to enjoy a child’s share in the labor of your fathers, unless your children are to be blest by your labors. You have no right to wear out and waste the hard-earned fame of your fathers to cover your indolence. Sydney Smith tells us that men seldom eulogize the wisdom and virtues of their fathers, but to excuse some folly or wickedness of their own. This truth is not a doubtful one. There are illustrations of it near and remote, ancient and modern. It was fashionable, hundreds of years ago, for the children of Jacob to boast, we have “Abraham to our father,” when they had long lost Abraham’s faith and spirit. That people contented themselves under the shadow of Abraham’s great name, while they repudiated the deeds which made his name great. Need I remind you that a similar thing is being done all over this country to-day? Need I tell you that the Jews are not the only people who built the tombs of the prophets, and garnished the sepulchers of the righteous? Washington could not die till he had broken the chains of his slaves. Yet his monument is built up by the price of human blood, and the traders in the bodies and souls of men shout-“We have Washington to our father.”-Alas! that it should be so; yet it is.

      The past is important only for what it's useful for in the present and as a means for the future.

    9. Fellow Citizens, I am not wanting in respect for the fathers of this republic. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were brave men. They were great men, too-great enough to give frame to a great age. It does not often happen to a nation to raise, at one time, such a number of truly great men. The point from which I am compelled to view them is not, certainly, the most favorable; and yet I cannot contemplate their great deeds with less than admiration. They were statesmen, patriots and heroes, and for the good they did, and the principles they contended for, I will unite with you to honor their memory. They loved their country better than their own private interests; and, though this is not the highest form of human excellence, all will concede that it is a rare virtue, and that when it is exhibited it ought to command respect. He who will, intelligently, lay down his life for his country is a man whom it is not in human nature to despise. Your fathers staked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor, on the cause of their country. In their admiration of liberty, they lost sight of all other interests. They were peace men; but they preferred revolution to peaceful submission to bondage. They were quiet men; but they did not shrink from agitating against oppression. They showed forbearance; but that they knew its limits. They believed in order; but not in the order of tyranny. With them, nothing was “settIed” that was not right. With them, justice, liberty and humanity were “final”; not slavery and oppression. You may well cherish the memory of such men. They were great in their day and generation. Their solid manhood stands out the more as we contrast it with these degenerate times. How circumspect, exact and proportionate were all their movements! How unlike the politicians of an hour! Their statesmanship looked beyond the passing moment, and stretched away in strength into the distant future. They seized upon eternal principles, and set a glorious example in their defence. Mark them! Fully appreciating the hardships to be encountered, firmly believing in the right of their cause, honorably inviting the scrutiny of an on-looking world, reverently appealing to heaven to attest their sincerity, soundly comprehending the solemn responsibility they were about to assume, wisely measuring the terrible odds against them, your fathers, the fathers of this republic, did, most deliberately, under the inspiration of a glorious patriotism, and with a sublime faith in the great principles of justice and freedom, lay deep, the corner-stone of the national super-structure, which has risen and still rises in grandeur around you. Of this fundamental work, this day is the anniversary. Our eyes are met with demonstrations of joyous enthusiasm. Banners and pennants wave exultingly on the breeze. The din of business, too, is hushed. Even mammon seems to have quitted his grasp on this day. The ear-piercing fife and the stirring drum unite their accents with the ascending peal of a thousand church bells. Prayers are made, hymns are sung, and sermons are preached in honor of this day; while the quick martial tramp of a great and multitudinous nation, echoed back by all the hills, valleys and mountains of a vast continent, bespeak the occasion one of thrilling and universal interest-nation’s jubilee.

      Douglass spends the first half of the speech celebrating the cause of the American revolution -- trumpeting the courage of the "founding fathers" and the assailing the corruption of Britain. He's all the time careful to point out that the story we tell of revolution today has lost the complexity of the moment. Why?

    10. The madness of this course, we believe, is admitted now, even by England; but we fear the lesson is wholly lost on our present rulers. Oppression makes a wise man mad. Your fathers were wise men, and if they did not go mad, they became restive under this treatment. They felt themselves the victims of grievous wrongs, wholly incurable in their colonial capacity. With brave men there is always a remedy for oppression. Just here, the idea of a total separation of the colonies from the crown was born! It was a startling idea, much more so than we, at this distance of time, regard it. The timid and the prudent (as has been intimated) of that day were, of course, shocked and alarmed by it.

      Oppression makes people mad enough to rebel.

    11. They went so far in their excitement as to pronounce the measures of government unjust, unreasonable, and oppressive, and altogether such as ought not to be quietly submitted to. I scarcely need say, fellow-citizens, that my opinion of those measures fully accords with that of your fathers. Such a declaration of agreement on my part would not be worth much to anybody. It would certainly prove nothing as to what part I might have taken had I lived during the great controversy of 1776. To say now that America was right, and England wrong, is exceedingly easy. Everybody can say it; the dastard, not less than the noble brave, can flippantly discant on the tyranny of England towards the American Colonies. It is fashionable to do so; but there was a time when, to pronounce against England, and in favor of the cause of the colonies, tried men’s souls. They who did so were accounted in their day plotters of mischief, agitators and rebels, dangerous men. To side with the right against the wrong, with the weak against the strong, and with the oppressed against the oppressor! here lies the merit, and the one which, of all others, seems unfashionable in our day. The cause of liberty may be stabbed by the men who glory in the deeds of your fathers

      It's very easy now to celebrate the Revolution -- but we have to remember that it once wasn't so fashionable to do so.

    12. This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the Fourth of July. It is the birth day of your National Independence, and of your political freedom. This, to you, as what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God. It carries your minds back to the day, and to the act of your great deliverance; and to the signs, and to the wonders, associated with that act, and that day.

      4th is a celebration meant to recall the day of emancipation.

    13. The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, the distance between this platform and the slave plantation, from which I escaped, is considerable-and the difficulties to he overcome in getting from the latter to the former are by no means slight. That I am here to-day is, to me, a matter of astonishment as well as of gratitude. You will not, therefore, be surprised, if in what I have to say I evince no elaborate preparation, nor grace my speech with any high sounding exordium. With little experience and with less learning, I have been able to throw my thoughts hastily and imperfectly together; and trusting to your patient and generous indulgence I will proceed to lay them before you.

      Douglass being a bit coy here for rhetorical effect -- here he is, a lowly escaped slave, addressing this highminded audience.

    14. A speech given at Rochester, New York, July 5, 1852

      At a suffragist meeting!

    1. Listener up there! what have you to confide to me? Look in my face while I snuff the sidle of evening, (Talk honestly, no one else hears you, and I stay only a minute longer.)

      To the reader: Speak to me, I am about to put out the candle of the evening...

    2. Divine am I inside and out, and I make holy whatever I touch or am touch’d from, The scent of these arm-pits aroma finer than prayer, This head more than churches, bibles, and all the creeds.

      A bit of sacrilege, eh? Well, what's he driving at? What culture is he responding to? Why might it be liberatory to celebrate the body in this manner?

      Even the most dejected parts of the body, though? The arm-pits? Who likes the scent of arm-pits ... well how is this "finer than prayer" in a church?

      (Is it that the human body is so divine that this is clearer access to miracle?)

    3. Copulation

      Why such a clinical term for sex?

    4. Through me many long dumb voices, Voices of the interminable generation of prisoners and slaves, Voices of the diseas’d and despairing and of thieves and dwarfs, Voices of cycles of preparation and accretion, And of the threads that connect the stars, and of wombs and of the father-stuff, And of the rights of them the others are down upon, Of the deform’d, trivial, flat, foolish, despised, Fog in the air, beetles rolling balls of dung.

      Voices of the marginalized and oppressed -- voices of cycles...? From the most abstract, highest order cycle of human nature to the "father-stuff" that makes it work, from the ethereal fog in the atmosphere to the beetles in the dirt rolling sh--.

    5. By God! I will accept nothing which all cannot have their counterpart of on the same terms.

      Why is this the sign of democracy? What does it mean?

    6. primeval

      As old as time?

    7. I am the mash’d fireman with breast-bone broken, Tumbling walls buried me in their debris, Heat and smoke I inspired, I heard the yelling shouts of my comrades, I heard the distant click of their picks and shovels, They have clear’d the beams away, they tenderly life me forth. I lie in the night air in my red shirt, the pervading hush is for my sake, Painless after all I lie exhausted but not so unhappy, White and beautiful are the faces around me, the heads are bared of their fire-caps, The kneeling crowd fades with the light of the torches.

      Suddenly he becomes a fireman at the last moment of his death...these things had fallen around him.

      Why does he mention that the faces are white and beautiful?

    8. Agonies are one of my changes of garments, I do not ask the wounded person how he feels, I myself become the wounded person, My hurts turn livid upon me as I lean on a cane and observe.

      Whitman transitions into the life of the wounded slave to feel the pain of being hunted down and beaten, but then he zooms back out into narration to explain to the reader what he's up to.

      What do we make of this empathy?

    9. The disdain and calmness of martyrs, The mother of old, condemn’d for a witch, burnt with dry wood, her children gazing on, The hounded slave that flags in the race, leans by the fence, blowing, cover’d with sweat, The twinges that sting like needles his legs and neck, the murderous buckshot and the bullets, All these I feel or am.

      Whitman looks back into colonial history and traces the experiences of those dejected up to the present slave.

      If his poetry is going to work, if it is going to embody the many different experiences of American life, it will need to actually FEEL with, BECOME, those experiences.

    10. I am the poet of the Body and I am the poet of the Soul, The pleasures of heaven are with me and the pains of hell are with me, The first I graft and increase upon myself, the latter I translate into a new tongue.

      He's marrying these supposed dualities (hence mention of the Cartesian split). What does it mean to "graft and increase" the pleasures of heaven? What about translating the pains of hell? How different is THAT from Edwards?

    11. The young men float on their backs, their white bellies bulge to the sun, they do not ask who seizes fast to them, They do not know who puffs and declines with pendant and bending arch, They do not think whom they souse with spray.

      Why add this verse? Why mention that these men "do not know" who's been surveilling them through her/his imagination?

    12. An unseen hand also pass’d over their bodies, It descended tremblingly from their temples and ribs.

      She projects this erotic gaze onto the men -- but, in reality, it is the eye of the poet doing this for her?

    13. Ah the homeliest of them is beautiful to her.

      Why the "homeliest"? Why are they "beautiful" when she's handsome?

    14. handsome and richly drest

      She's "handsome" and dressed as a marker of wealth.

    15. fine house by the rise of the bank,

      Does it matter that she owns the "fine house" overlooking the ocean?

    16. Twenty-eight young men bathe by the shore, Twenty-eight young men and all so friendly; Twenty-eight years of womanly life and all so lonesome.

      Anaphora: 28 ... 28 ... 28 ... years of womanly-life -- implied that she's become an "old maid."

    1. devilish Indian behind every tree

      Why an "Indian"? What does this hearken back to?

    2. with the pink ribbons

      Why insisting upon this?

    3. pr’y thee, put off your journey until sunrise, and sleep in your own bed to-night. A lone woman is troubled with such dreams and such thoughts, that she’s afeard of herself, sometimes. Pray, tarry with me this night, dear husband, of all nights in the year!

      Newly married woman asks her husband to sleep in bed for tonight.

    4. Faith

      How's that for a heavy-handed metaphor?

    1. the officers)

      Why parentheses?

    2. If still you think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body.

      Again, how is hiding a body proof of his sanity? Because he could think clearly about social assumptions and presumptions.

      Why is it important to have his name cleared of madness?

    3. And have I not told you that what you mistake for madness is but over-acuteness of the sense? –now, I say, there came to my ears a low, dull, quick sound, such as a watch makes when enveloped in cotton. I knew that sound well, too. It was the beating of the old man’s heart.

      Cotton?

    4. I could scarcely contain my feelings of triumph. To think that there I was, opening the door, little by little, and he not even to dream of my secret deeds or thoughts. I fairly chuckled at the idea; and perhaps he heard me; for he moved on the bed suddenly, as if startled.

      The plotting is itself humorous....

    5. So you see he would have been a very profound old man, indeed, to suspect that every night, just at twelve, I looked in upon him while he slept.

      Wait, now it is the old man's fault for not being profound enough to know you were lurking at night plotting to kill him?

    6. Oh, you would have laughed to see how cunningly I thrust it in!

      Who does he expect he's talking to? The reader? What's he assuming about us?

    7. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded –with what caution –with what foresight –with what dissimulation I went to work!

      Someone who is "mad" can't be so cautious and judicious?

    8. TRUE! –nervous –very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?

      Begins in media res. Who is he talking to?

    1. He recollected Rip at once, and corroborated his story in the most satisfactory manner. He assured the company that it was a fact, handed down from his ancestor the historian, that the Catskill Mountains had always been haunted by strange beings. That it was affirmed that the great Hendrick Hudson, the first discoverer of the river and country, kept a kind of vigil there every twenty years, with his crew of the Half-Moon, being permitted in this way to revisit the scenes of his enterprise, and keep a guardian eye upon the river, and the great city called by his name. That his father had once seen them in their old Dutch dresses playing at ninepins in a hollow of the mountain; and that he himself had heard, one summer afternoon, the sound of their balls, like long peals of thunder.

      The mountain was haunted by Dutch ancestry? What's that mean?

    2. There was a drop of comfort, at least, in this intelligence

      Savage.

    3. “what brought him to the election with a gun on his shoulder, and a mob at his heels, and whether he meant to breed a riot in the village?” “Alas! gentlemen,” cried Rip, somewhat dismayed, “I am a poor quiet man, a native of the place, and a loyal subject of the king, God bless him!”

      They now suddenly wonder why Rip's come down to an election with a gun ... is he looking to breed a mob?

      Then he claims to be a "loyal subject of the king!"

    4. GENERAL WASHINGTON.

      THe old portrait of the King had been replaced by Washington ...

      Is he making a statement about postcolonial America, perhaps? To be careful about simply switching out names and leaders?

    5. there now was reared a tall naked pole, with something on the top that looked like a red nightcap, and from it was fluttering a flag, on which was a singular assemblage of stars and stripes—all this was strange and incomprehensible.

      No more shaded tree, but a pole with the American flag.

      Interesting ... why was there no real sign of British patriotism in the colonies? Why do we now have the US flag replacing a kind of pastoral image of the tree?

    6. He now hurried forth, and hastened to his old resort, the little village inn—but it too was gone. A large rickety wooden building stood in its place, with great gaping windows, some of them broken, and mended with old hats and petticoats, and over the door was painted, “The Union Hotel, by Jonathan Doolittle.”

      Significance of the new pub's name? How about the fact that it is now windowed?

    7.  Poor Rip was at last reduced almost to despair; and his only alternative, to escape from the labor of the farm and clamor of his wife, was to take gun in hand and stroll away into the woods

      Rip would escape from being berated by his wife by taking his gun and dog up into the woods to hunt.

    8. to tell the truth

      ?

    9. found an old firelock lying by him, the barrel incrusted with rust, the lock falling off, and the stock worm-eaten. He now suspected that the grave roysters of the mountain had put a trick upon him, and having dosed him with liquor, had robbed him of his gun

      His gun was now rusted and worn out (outdated!)

    10. He was naturally a thirsty soul

      wink*

    11. sugar-loaf hat
    12. ninepins
    13. cloth jerkin
    14. Times grew worse and worse with Rip Van Winkle as years of matrimony rolled on; a tart temper never mellows with age, and a sharp tongue is the only edged tool that grows keener by constant use. For a long while he used to console himself, when driven from home, by frequenting a kind of perpetual club of the sages, philosophers, and other idle personages of the village, which held its sessions on a bench before a small inn, designated by a rubicund portrait of his majesty George the Third. Here they used to sit in the shade, of a long lazy summer’s day, talking listlessly over village gossip, or telling endless sleepy stories about nothing. But it would have been worth any statesman’s money to have heard the profound discussions which sometimes took place, when by chance an old newspaper fell into their hands, from some passing traveler. How solemnly they would listen to the contents, as drawled out by Derrick Van Bummel, the schoolmaster, a dapper, learned little man, who was not to be daunted by the most gigantic word in the dictionary; and how sagely they would deliberate upon public events some months after they had taken place.

      The scene outside of the local pub with other idle souls -- it's just drenched in satire.

      Why, in juxtaposition with the ending, is it significant that they're here meditating on months-old news? How does that fly in the face of the print culture of the American Revolution?

    15. Rip Van Winkle, however, was one of those happy mortals, of foolish, well-oiled dispositions, who take the world easy, eat white bread or brown, whichever can be got with least thought or trouble, and would rather starve on a penny than work for a pound.

      He's just looking to get by without much trouble.

    16. galligaskins
    17. His children, too, were as ragged and wild as if they belonged to nobody

      Early American free-range parenting?

    18. it was of no use

      Weird sense of fate?

    19. He would never even refuse to assist a neighbor in the roughest toil, and was a foremost man at all country frolics for husking Indian corn, or building stone fences. The women of the village, too, used to employ him to run their errands, and to do such little odd jobs as their less obliging husbands would not do for them; in a word, Rip was ready to attend to anybody’s business but his own; but as to doing family duty, and keeping his farm in order, it was impossible

      He would even go out and help others with their errands, but he was useless back home on the farm.

    20.  The great error in Rip’s composition was an insuperable aversion to all kinds of profitable labor

      Ha! So, he was a slacker.

    21. The children of the village, too, would shout with joy whenever he approached. He assisted at their sports, made their playthings, taught them to fly kites and shoot marbles, and told them long stories of ghosts, witches, and Indians. Whenever he went dodging about the village, he was surrounded by a troop of them, hanging on his skirts, clambering on his back, and playing a thousand tricks on him with impunity; and not a dog would bark at him throughout the neighborhood.

      Rip was just beloved by the neighborhood kids and animals?

    22. Certain it is that he was a great favorite among all the good wives of the village, who, as usual with the amiable sex, took his part in all family squabbles, and never failed, whenever they talked those matters over in their evening gossipings, to lay all the blame on Dame Van Winkle.

      Irving pits the woman in a gossip competition.

    23. he was a simple, good-natured man; he was, moreover, a kind neighbor and an obedient, henpecked husband. Indeed, to the latter circumstance might be owing that meekness of spirit which gained him such universal popularity; for those men are most apt to be obsequious and conciliating abroad who are under the discipline of shrews at home. Their tempers, doubtless, are rendered pliant and malleable in the fiery furnace of domestic tribulation, and a curtain lecture is worth all the sermons in the world for teaching the virtues of patience and long-suffering. A termagant wife may, therefore, in some respects, be considered a tolerable blessing; and if so, Rip Van Winkle was thrice blessed.

      Rip was a simple man, good natured and therefore loved in the village. He was also -- as the narrator has it -- under the reign of an overbearing wife at home.

      Might be good to think about how out of whack this depiction seems in light of Murray's descriptions of the way women were treated in the domestic sphere.

      Also, to what extent does this character or trope have salience in 2017 culture? Ex.: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HenpeckedHusband

    24. which, to tell the precise truth, was sadly time-worn and weather-beaten

      Houses are beaten, failed to modernize as with Rip?

    25. It is a little village of great antiquity, having been founded by some of the Dutch colonists, in the early times of the province, just about the beginning of the government of the good Peter Stuyvesant (may he rest in peace!), and there were some of the houses of the original settlers standing within a few years, with lattice windows, gable fronts surmounted with weathercocks, and built of small yellow bricks brought from Holland.

      Notes the Dutch ancestry.

    1. The exquisite delicacy of the female mind proclaimeth the exactness of its texture, while its nice sense of honour announceth its innate, its native grandeur. And indeed, in one respect, the preeminence seems to be tacitly allowed us; for after an education which limits and confines, and employments and recreations which naturally tend to enervate the body, and debilitate the mind; after we have from early youth been adorned with ribbons, and other gewgaws, dressed out like the ancient victims previous to a sacrifice, being taught by the care of our parents in collecting the most showy materials that the ornamenting our exteriour ought to be the principal object of our attention; after, I say, fifteen years thus spent, we are introduced into the world, amid the united adulation of every beholder. Praise is sweet to the soul; we are immediately intoxicated by large draughts of flattery, which being plentifully administered, is to the pride of our hearts, the most acceptable incense. It is expected that with the other sex we should commence immediate war, and that we should triumph over the machinations of the most artful. We must be constantly upon our guard; prudence and discretion must be our characteristiks; and we must rise superiour to, and obtain a complete victory over those who have been long adding to the native strength of their minds, by an unremitted study of men and books, and who have, moreover, conceived from the loose characters which they have seen portrayed in the extensive variety of their reading, a most contemptible opinion of the sex. Thus unequal, we are, notwithstanding, forced to the combat, and the infamy which is consequent upon the smallest deviation in our conduct, proclaims the high idea which was formed of our native strength; and thus, indirectly at least, is the preference acknowledged to be our due. And if we are allowed an equality of acquirements, let serious studies equally employ our minds, and we will bid our souls arise to equal strengths. We will meet upon even ground, the despot man; we will rush with alacrity to the combat, and, crowned by success, we shall then answer the exalted expectations, which are formed. Though sensibility, soft compassion, and gentle commiseration, are inmates in the female bosom, yet against every deep laid art, altogether fearless of the event, we will set them in array; for assuredly the wreath of victory will encircle the spotless brow.

      Women are raised for 15 years and showered with praise for their beauty and then suddenly put into battle with boys who've been groomed to run the world.

      ASIDE: To what extent do you think -- in school, in society in general -- boys are treated more seriously as intellectuals even still to this day?

    2. I AM aware that there are many passages in the sacred oracles which seem to give the advantage to the other sex; but I consider all these as wholly metaphorical.

      Maybe there are passages in scripture that seem to favor men -- these are metaphorical!

    3. there are who assert, that as the animal power of the one sex are superiour, of course their mental faculties also must be stronger; thus attributing strength of mind to the transient organization of this earth born tenement. But if this reasoning is just, man must be content to yield the palm to many of the brute creation, since by not a few of his brethren of the field, he is far surpassed in bodily strength

      People argue that because men are physically powerful this must be true mentally as well. Umm....wouldn't it stand to reason then that anything stronger than men is smarter? Or that stronger men among men are the smartest?

    4. Yes, ye lordly, ye haughty sex, our souls are by nature equal to yours; the same breath of God animates, enlivens, and invigorates us; and that we are not fallen lower than yourselves, let those witness who have greatly towered above the various discouragements by which they have been so heavily oppressed; and though I am unacquainted with the list of celebrated characters on either side, yet from the observations I have made in the contracted circle in which I have moved, I dare confidently believe, that from the commencement of time to the present day, there hath been as many females, as males, who, by the mere force of natural powers, have merited the crown of applause; who, thus unassisted, have seized the wreath of fame

      Guess what, fellas? If we're all made by God then we're all equal..

    5. Should it still be vociferated, “Your domestick employments are sufficient” – I would calmly ask, is it reasonable, that a candidate for immortality, for the joys of heaven, an intelligent being, who is to spend an eternity in contemplating the works of the Deity, should at present be so degraded, as to be allowed no other ideas, than those which are suggested by the mechanism of a pudding, or the sewing the seams of a garment? Pity that all such censurers of female improvement do not go one step further, and deny their future existence; to be consistent they surely ought.

      So, if familial duties are enough are you really trying to say that divine creatures are put here to just sit and sew?

    6. Will it be urged that those acquirements would supersede our domestick duties. I answer that every requisite in female economy is easily attained; and, with truth I can add, that when once attained, they require no further mental attention. Nay, while we are pursuing the needle, or the superintendency of the family, I repeat, that our minds are at full liberty for reflection; that imagination may exert itself in full vigor; and that if a just foundation is early laid, our ideas will then be worthy of rational beings.

      Oh you think we won't work at the home? Trust me, that's not intellectually taxing work. In fact, this will only improve our lot.

    7. Unnecessary visits would only be indulged by way of relaxation, or to answer the demands of consanguinity and friendship. Females would become discreet, their judgments would be invigorated, and their partners for life being circumspectly chosen, an unhappy Hymen would then be as rare, as is now the reverse.

      Whoa! Taken it right to them...is she saying that all kinds of relations between the sexes will be better? Why would she make that argument?

    8. Now, was she permitted the same instructors as her brother, (with an eye however to their particular departments) for the employment of a rational mind an ample field would be opened. In astronomy she might catch a glimpse of the immensity of the Deity, and thence she would form amazing conceptions of the august and supreme Intelligence. In geography she would admire Jehovah in the midst of his benevolence; thus adapting this globe to the various wants and amusements of its inhabitants. In natural philosophy she would adore the infinite majesty of heaven, clothed in condescension; and as she traversed the reptile world, she would hail the goodness of a creating God. A mind, thus filled, would have little room for the trifles with which our sex are, with too much justice, accused of amusing themselves, and they would thus be rendered fit companions for those, who should one day wear them as their crown.

      If women were permitted the same advantages of men, all of these trifles you complain about in women would diminish.

    9. But from that period what partiality! how is the one exalted, and the other depressed, by the contrary modes of education which are adopted! the one is taught to aspire, and the other is early confined and limitted. As their years increase, the sister must be wholly domesticated, while the brother is led by the hand through all the flowery paths of science. Grant that their minds are by nature equal, yet who shall wonder at the apparent superiority, if indeed custom becomes second nature; nay if it taketh place of nature, and that it doth the experience of each day will evince. At length arrived at womanhood, the uncultivated fair one feels a void, which the employments allotted her are by no means capable of filling.

      The way raising boys vs. raising girls...

      Still think this is true?

      (Refinery29 vs. Brobible)

    10. May we not trace its source in the difference of education, and continued advantages? Will it be said that the judgment of a male of two years old, is more sage than that of a female’s of the same age? I believe the reverse is generally observed to be true.

      There's nothing superior about holding women back and then claiming it's a natural difference.

    11. Perhaps it will be asked if I furnish these facts as instances of excellency in our sex. Certainly not; but as proofs of a creative faculty, of a lively imagination. Assuredly great activity of mind is thereby discovered, and was this activity properly directed, what beneficial effects would follow. Is the needle and kitchen sufficient to employ the operations of a soul thus organized? I should conceive not, Nay, it is a truth that those very departments leave the intelligent principle vacant, and at liberty for speculation. Are we deficient in reason? we can only reason from what we know, and if an opportunity of acquiring knowledge hath been denied us, the inferiority of our sex cannot fairly be deduced from thence

      She lists a series of proof of mental acuity of women, even though they seem like petty actions. But then she attacks: this isn't women's fault. They've been locked up in the domestic sphere with no room to explore and grow!

    12. Is it upon mature consideration we adopt the idea, that nature is thus partial in her distributions? Is it indeed a fact, that she hath yielded to one half of the human species so unquestionable a mental superiority? I know that to both sexes elevated understandings, and the reverse, are common. But, suffer me to ask, in what the minds of females are so notoriously deficient, or unequal

      Opens up her argument: why do we accept that nature has privileged just men with intellectual prowess? She herself has witnessed "elevated understanding in women."

  5. Sep 2017
    1. Therefore vow before me to live free and independent, and to prefer death to anything that will try to place you back in chains. Swear, finally, to pursue forever the traitors and enemies of your independence.

      Consider how fiery and insistent this rhetoric is and now imagine the anxiety this caused slavemasters in the United States.

    2. Let us ensure, however, that a missionary spirit does not destroy our work; let us allow our neighbors to breathe in peace; may they live quietly under the laws that they have made for themselves, and let us not, as revolutionary firebrands, declare ourselves the lawgivers of the Caribbean, nor let our glory consist in troubling the peace of the neighboring islands.

      Fascinating. We are revolutionaries, but we need not extend our spirit and rules of governance throughout the Caribbean.

    3. We have dared to be free, let us be thus by ourselves and for ourselves. Let us imitate the grown child: his own weight breaks the boundary that has become an obstacle to him.

      Think about Paine's analogy to the mother and to the mother's milk as a symbol of colonial rule.

    4. Let them tremble when they approach our coast, if not from the memory of those cruelties they perpetrated here, then from the terrible resolution that we will have made to put to death anyone born French whose profane foot soils the land of liberty.

      Whoa!

    5. Native citizens, men, women, girls, and children, let your gaze extend on all parts of this island: look there for your spouses, your husbands, your brothers, your sisters. Indeed! Look there for your children, your suckling infants, what have they become?... I shudder to say it ... the prey of these vultures.

      Where Toussaint's Constitution looked to set in place a strict regulation of mores around family life, Dessalines uses familial connections to mobilize dissent.

    6. Everything revives the memories of the cruelties of this barbarous people: our laws, our habits, our towns, everything still carries the stamp of the French

      Dessalines renames the island Haiti -- the indigenous name -- in a recognition that decolonization calls for the confrontation with all vestiges of colonial power?

    7. we must take any hope of re-enslaving us away from the inhuman government that for so long kept us in the most humiliating torpor

      The fear of re-enslavement drives this vs. the "inhuman" government of the colonizers.

    8. It is not enough to have expelled the barbarians who have bloodied our land for two centuries; it is not enough to have restrained those ever-evolving factions that one after another mocked the specter of liberty that France dangled before you

      The French are barbarians -- and guilty of violent, murderous crimes in the same vein as the British crown to the American colonies.

    1. The citizen that shall be chosen by the Governor Toussaint-Louverture to take the direction of the government upon his death, shall swear in front of the Central Assembly to execute the Constitution of Saint-Domingue and to remain attached to the French government, and shall be immediately installed in his functions

      Not only is the leader after Toussaint to be hand selected by him, but the next leader must swear allegiance to France.

    2. In order to strengthen the tranquility that the colony owes to steadfastness, activity, indefatigable zeal and rare virtues of the General Toussaint-Louverture, and in sign of the unlimited trust of the inhabitants of Saint-Domingue, the Constitution attribute exclusively to this general the right to designate the citizen who, in the unfortunate event of the general’s death, shall immediately replace him

      Here's an important distinction between the foundation of the US government and the product of Haiti's revolution. Toussaint inscribed himself as leader for life.

    3. The colony being essentially agricultural cannot suffer the least disruption in the works of its cultivation.

      Emphasis put on production and labor re-opens the door to exploitation.

    4. The catholic, apostolic, roman faith shall be the only publicly professed faith.

      In an odd way, we return to the logic of Puritanism?

    5. There shall exist no distinction other than those based on virtue and talent, and other superiority afforded by law in the exercise of a public function

      Toussaint wants to form a true meritocracy, a description more specific than Jefferson's "pursuit of happiness" line.

    6. There cannot exist slaves on this territory, servitude is therein forever abolished. All men are born, live and die free and French.

      Interesting to put this language up against Jefferson's Declaration of Independence.

    1. Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved. Misery is often the parent of the most affecting touches in poetry. — Among the blacks is misery enough, God knows, but no poetry. Love is the peculiar ;oestrum of the poet. Their love is ardent, but it kindles the senses only, not the imagination. Religion indeed has produced a Phyllis Whately; but it could not produce a poet. The compositions published under her name are below the dignity of criticism.

      She is an imitator.

    2. Comparing them by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous

      Then to illustrate this he turns attention to Wheatley below:

    3. Whether the black of the negro resides in the reticular membrane between the skin and scarf-skin, or in the scarf-skin itself; whether it proceeds from the colour of the blood, the colour of the bile, or from that of some other secretion, the difference is fixed in nature, and is as real as if its seat and cause were better known to us. And is this difference of no importance? Is it not the foundation of a greater or less share of beauty in the two races? Are not the fine mixtures of red and white, the expressions of every passion by greater or less suffusions of colour in the one, preferable to that eternal monotony, which reigns in the countenances, that immoveable veil of black which covers all the emotions of the other race? Add to these, flowing hair, a more elegant symmetry of form, their own judgment in favour of the whites, declared by their preference of them, as uniformly as is the preference of the Oranootan for the black women over those of his own species. The circumstance of superior beauty, is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man?

      He is using the natural science of the day -- idea the beauty in animals leads to breeding and is preferable in nature -- to make an argument for WS.

      Now we might look upon this text as, a disgusting bunch of ideas written by a man in the 18th century, when these ideas are just becoming prevalent in the culture.

      However, it's worth noting how hard these tropes and stereotypes of the slave days have taken to die. I mean, you've probably all heard about the "Barbie Syndrome," right, that young black children in America grow up with a model for beauty which all the time alienates them ... that's a sociological study conducted prob about 1980s/90s, I'd have to check.

      And we could have a discussion about how far you think we've come even by then, if you'd like. But Jefferson is writing at a time where these myths centered on WS in beauty, intelligence, culture are bing propagated and then solidified as scientific truth.

      Well, still traces of these ideas circulating in our culture?

    4. To these objections, which are political, may be added others, which are physical and moral. The first difference which strikes us is that of colour.

      Also, there is physical and moral difference.

    5. It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state, and thus save the expence of supplying, by importation of white settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.

      Slavery will definitely end and, at that point, we will need to find white labor to replace the freed black men for these reasons.

    1. Remember, Christians, Negros, black as Cain,

      Ambiguous wording. Is this line addressing Christians, or is it addressing a kind of general YOU? If it is the latter, then Christians and Negros have the potential to be "black as Cain"? Even that has multiple meanings: it is to say that white Christians might also be like Cain? Is it to say the Negros are Christians? It places them back on some kind of fundamental equality.