- Dec 2019
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
right esotropia
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0000565
-
cortical edema
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0002181
-
downward gaze deviation
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0025330
-
tongue thrusting
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0100703
-
axial hypotonia
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0008936
-
status epilepticus
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0002133
-
Hyponatremia
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0002902
-
Cerebellar atrophy
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001272
-
Myoclonic jerks
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001336
-
Ataxia
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001251
-
Hypotonia
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001252
-
Progressive microcephaly
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0000253
-
Developmental regression
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0002376
-
Developmental delay
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001263
-
-
monarchinitiative.org monarchinitiative.org
-
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001250
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
The x mark is also sometimes used for this purpose (most notably on election ballot papers, e.g. in the United Kingdom), but otherwise usually indicates "no", incorrectness, or failure.
-
-
sites.google.com sites.google.com
-
I cut out all forms of communication with my Muslim friends and I showed an enormous amount of resentment to my Muslim neighbors and co workers
At the heart of the process of radicalization leading to violence is a dynamic that involves individuals severing ties with those in their immediate environment (family, friends, colleagues, etc.),
-
-
sites.google.com sites.google.com
-
I cut out all forms of communication with my Muslim friends and I showed an enormous amount of resentment to my Muslim neighbors and co workers
At the heart of the process of radicalization leading to violence is a dynamic that involves individuals severing ties with those in their immediate environment (family, friends, colleagues, etc.),
-
- Oct 2019
-
lincyi.pixnet.net lincyi.pixnet.net
-
在地人推薦
-
-
lincyi.pixnet.net lincyi.pixnet.net
-
戰區
分類:3-2
- M: no
- wiki: no
- special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
吃口碑的
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
reg.clinicalgenome.org reg.clinicalgenome.org
-
allele id lookup result: https://reg.clinicalgenome.org/redmine/projects/registry/genboree_registry/by_caid?caid=CA346764646
-
-
flower033880.pixnet.net flower033880.pixnet.net
-
flower033880.pixnet.net flower033880.pixnet.net
-
很夠味
3-2
- M: no
- wiki: no
- special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
時不時
3-2
- M: no
- wiki: no
- special meaning from context (直覺): yes
Q:來自台語? non-compositional?
-
- Sep 2019
-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
allele id lookup result
-
Seizures
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0001250
-
22 mo
Monarch lookup result: https://monarchinitiative.org/phenotype/HP:0031936
-
-
flower033880.pixnet.net flower033880.pixnet.net
-
外國進口的
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 很高級<br> (我的意思是 Made in China 就不會說是國外進口的)
-
也有30幾年了
分類:3-2
- M: no
- wiki: no
- special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
豎起大拇哥
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 很棒<br> (Q: 默默)
-
真材實料
分類:2-1
- M: yes
-
一週只賣3天
分類:3-2
- M: no
- wiki: no
- special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
-
nes50313.pixnet.net nes50313.pixnet.net
-
在味蕾上跳舞
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 豐富多樣的味道
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
viviyu.pixnet.net viviyu.pixnet.net
-
沒什麼抵抗力
Sentiment: Neu<br> Pragmatics: 遇到喜歡的東西
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
smartrabbit.pixnet.net smartrabbit.pixnet.net
-
初心者
-
正點
-
嫑嫑的
-
-
drugs.pixnet.net drugs.pixnet.net
-
不用介紹了吧
-
-
dream3cmp3.pixnet.net dream3cmp3.pixnet.net
-
你看看你看看
-
很敢給
-
-
lincyi.pixnet.net lincyi.pixnet.net
-
不打折
-
沒辦法
-
是有原因的
-
-
lincyi.pixnet.net lincyi.pixnet.net
-
踩到地雷
-
-
lincyi.pixnet.net lincyi.pixnet.net
-
不多說
-
你看看
-
當地人力推
-
-
kel8257.pixnet.net kel8257.pixnet.net
-
好療癒啊
-
-
flower033880.pixnet.net flower033880.pixnet.net
-
走過路過不會錯過
-
-
flower033880.pixnet.net flower033880.pixnet.net
-
好想偷摸一把
-
-
flower033880.pixnet.net flower033880.pixnet.net
-
剛剛好
-
一根接著一根
-
我覺得還不錯耶
3-2 special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
我喜歡~
3-2 special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
-
eva6955.pixnet.net eva6955.pixnet.net
-
真的要昏倒了
Sentiment: Neg<br> Pragmatics: 無法接受
-
是有沒有這麼幸運
Sentiment: Neg<br> Pragmatics: 反義
-
-
swanitfoodiary.pixnet.net swanitfoodiary.pixnet.net
-
想怎樣
Sentiment: Neg<br> Pragmatics: 怪怪der
-
-
emilyyhliu.pixnet.net emilyyhliu.pixnet.net
-
堵住同事們的嘴
Sentiment: Neu<br> Pragmatics:
-
-
susanlives.com susanlives.com
-
一口接一口
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 非常好吃
-
-
newbetty.cc newbetty.cc
-
不囉嗦
Sentiment: Neu<br> Pragmatics: go straight to ...
-
當然是沒話說
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 無可挑剔
-
-
newbetty.cc newbetty.cc
-
到爆炸
Sentiment: Neu<br> Pragmatics: 強調
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
summermom.pixnet.net summermom.pixnet.net
-
怎麼對得起
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 浪費難得機會
-
-
ssag.pixnet.net ssag.pixnet.net
-
一整個就
Sentiment: 視情況<br> Pragmatics: 強調
-
挑嘴
分類:3-2
- M: no
- wiki: no
- special meaning from context (直覺): yes
-
咖啡拉花
分類:2-2
- M: no
- wiki: yes
-
-
vhygdih0412.pixnet.net vhygdih0412.pixnet.net
-
最對味
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 很配
-
平價
分類:2-1
- M: yes
-
-
karenlu925.pixnet.net karenlu925.pixnet.net
-
不打折扣
Sentiment: Pos<br> Pragmatics: 品質一樣很好
-
-
styleme.pixnet.net styleme.pixnet.net
-
很有誠意
Sentiment: pos Pragmatics: 用料實在
-
清爽
分類:2-1
- M: yes
-
滿嘴
分類:2-1
- M: yes
-
台灣茶
分類:2
- M: no
- wiki: yes
-
推出
分類:2
- M: yes
-
鳳梨酥
分類:2
- M: yes
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
lincyi.pixnet.net lincyi.pixnet.net
-
道地
分類:2-1
- M: yes
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
Accuracy (recovery
-
Linearity
-
Recovery studies and quality control
-
LC-MS Analysis
-
HPLC Analysis
-
Extraction and Cleanup
-
Sampling point, Sample Size and Sample collection
-
Analysis of Imidacloprid residues in various food commodities and hazard index estimation
-
Animals
-
- Aug 2019
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
Section 2 then begins the real ball game, namely everyone has the following fundamental freedom. The one difficulty we had, as a committee, is with Section 2(b). What do we do with freedom of thought when you have got legislation dealing with have propaganda? How far is it possible to retain such articles as Section 281(1) of the Criminal Code and Section 281(2)? Moreover, you will see we have quoted from Article 20 of the United National Covenant of Civil and Political Rights where propaganda of this kind is regarded as inconsistent with freedom of speech. [Page 87] So we raised the question which seemed to me to be necessary to raise with you, that caution must be exercised, we hope, by the courts in due course, or by you, as draftsmen on how far you are prepared to push the concept of free speech consistent with our experience of hate propaganda. One suggestion we make here-and I do not wish to do anything more than to drop it as a hint, but you may want to have some language that some of the modern constitutions have, which state very starkly and flatly that the advocacy of genocide or group libel is forbidden. But I had the honour to be the chairman of the special committee on hate propaganda in 1965. At that time we came to the flat conclusion that the advocacy of group hatred and genocide was totally inconsistent with the democratic process and no democratic state could tolerate it. Now, whether you want to put that flatly in a constitution is for you to consider; but I think it is for us to bring it to your attention, because it is of importance.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 132.
-
This Committee did not have a parochial view; this Committee does not pretend that the human rights question belongs to any sector of the Canadian people. It belongs to them all. But, peculiarly enough, there are two or three areas where the Jewish interest happens to be special, and in some cases very sensitive. One is the problem of war criminals, and how that relates to certain protections offered by a charter of rights in the criminal law field. Another is the problem of free speech, and how far that affects such things as hate propaganda
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 131-132.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
We want to make it very clear, first of all, that in principle we support the entrenchment of a bill of rights in the constitution. We want to see the constitution patriated to Canada and we want to see in that constitution an entrenched bill of rights. However, we do have some concerns. We are not altogether happy with all of the bill of rights. in that connection we are, I suppose, in somewhat the same situation as a number of other groups who have appeared before you. For example, we feel that some of the statements are too vague. Having been a part of the preparation of the brief of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, I can say that I, personally, share some of the concerns that they have in terms of the vagueness of some of the language, and I speak particularly of such words as “fundamental freedoms”, and those kinds of things in which we talk about “natural rights”, et cetera. We would like to see some of these things spelled out. On the question, for example, of freedom of speech, we believe very strongly in freedom of speech, while at the same time, of course, being against censorship. But we would like to see freedom of speech limited only in certain specific ways. In the brief we have indicated, for example, that to a large extent we believe in the doctrine of clear and present danger. We think that freedom of speech should be curtailed where the danger is clear. For example, we have no right to go into a crowded theatre and shout “Fire!” resulting in people being trampled to death as a result of fleeing from a fire which is nonexistent and where there is no danger at all. In a situation like that, obviously, we do not have absolute freedom. But we think this needs to be spelled out a lot more clearly than it is today.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 131.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
I would like to ask you if you have considered, Ms. Hardy, the notion of freedom of the press as an individual right or collective right? Ms. Hardy: It could be considered both because if you speak of freedom of the press for a newspaper, it includes the whole role of a newspaper in a community as well as the role of an individual reporter or columnist, so that I really feel that there would be no point in having freedom of the press for an individual if you did not have it for the publication for which the individual happened to be working, either perhaps in the electronic media or in the print media. So I would prefer to have it refer to both an individual and collective group. Senator Lapointe: Do you think that editors of papers or radio stations would have to come here also to express their opinion on freedom of the press? Ms. Hardy: We would include them as responsible leaders, presumably in the community, and the value of having responsible leadership is very noticeable now that the Royal Commission on Newspapers is sitting and I think that you have to have the leadership in order to develop followers and principles.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 130.
-
- Jul 2019
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
I want to refer you to Section 2 of the resolution which is a Section on fundamental freedoms. It says: Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion, (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion expression, including freedom of the press and other media of information What I want to ask you is, how do you think the word “everyone” would be interpreted as it pertains to everyone has the following freedoms, the freedom of the press, freedom of other media of information. I want to take you back in this country about four of five years when the government across the way introduced legislation, which I supported, concerning Time magazine and Reader’s Digest, to try and Canadianize the magazine industry in this country. I am wondering whether or not if we were to enshrine Section 2 in the constitution as written, Time magazine or Reader’s Digest could have gone to the courts and said: “We have a consitutional right in this country of freedom of expression and freedom of the press and freedom of information, freedom of the media; therefore, the government of Canada [Page 12] and the Parliament of Canada do not have the right to legislate restrictively against our two organizations.” Could it be interpreted in that way? Ms. Crandall: Mr. Nystrom, I think that is the kind of question which an expert should be asked to answer. This is what we are saying now, We have not had an opportunity to look at all sides of these questions to give you any kind of an answer. Again, I am not trying to be difficult. But that is one of the questions which we would like to ask someone who is knowledgeable. Mr. Nystrom: I appreciate the answer. The reason why I ask the question is that the words “everyone” and “citizens of Canada” are used throughout the resolution. I am not a lawyer myself, but it would seem to imply that these could be given a fairly wide interpretation, and I am concerned that we might have in a constitution something that is restrictive where we could not increase Canadian content. Let me ask you the same question again about the electronic media. There is growing concern that we Canadianize radio, television—and the CRTC is concerned about this, about television programs coming in from the United States. There is talk now about a second CBC network in this country. Again, I want to ask you a similar question pertaining to the electronic media. If everybody has the freedom of expression and freedom of the press and other media of information, in your opinion, or perhaps in the opinion of your colleague, do you think we would be able to do this as a Parliament, where the constitution says we are denying a fundamental right to everyone, perhaps NBC, New York, or ABC somewhere in the United States? Ms. Hardy: I think, Mr. Nystrom, that it is very important. I have served abroad for Canada in the Department of External Affairs, in the public affairs field, and I feel that it is very important that we develop a Canadian culture, that we develop an interest in things Canadian and a pride, and I grant that there are very good programs produced by the electronic media of other countries but I think we should be proud of our own heritage and be proud of what we can do. I have just been at a briefing on plans for CBC 2, Tele Deux, and I am very pleased that this is what may be coming along shortly and I would hope that we would not refuse all foreign media offers to assist us in our cultural development, but I think we should certainly give ourselves the chance to be first in the field and to welcome the opportunity and the pride in our own country and in what we can develop ourselves. This is a continuing subject of interest financially as well as culturally, naturally, and I would hope that the media club, which now covers the electronic media representatives as well as the press, would be in the forefront of assisting in developments if possible. Thank you. [Page 13] Mr. Nystrom: I wonder if you could possibly, if you have time to do a written brief to the Committee, to try and seek some advice on those questions, because I agree fully with you that we have to develop a Canadian culture and of course we need some input from other countries around the world because we are part of the global village, we have to have a Canadian identity and it is very important, and I would be very concerned if the way Section 2 is written that perhaps we could be denied through our constitution the right to develop fully the Canadian culture and pehaps you could look at that. I also wanted to ask your interpretation of a couple of other words in Section 2. I wanted to ask you what you think the interpretation in your opinion would be of other media of information. We have singled out here freedom of belief, opinion, expression, including the freedom of the press. I know what the press is, I think, but what would be the interpretation legally, in your opinion, of other media of information, what would that include? Ms. Hardy: I would expect that that would include the electronic journalism. The press is usually referred to as print media. Media is a very broad term that has had to be used because you cannot just refer to the press now because it covers a number of other representatives who inform, through one source or another, and I think the electronic media has an important place now in our culture because communications in this country is an aspect of helping unify the country, I think, by letting us get to know each other, not only through print but through electronic means.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 128-130.
-
Thank you, Mr. Joint Chairman, for giving the Media Club the opportunity to before this Special Joint Committee. As you will see from our submission, Media Club is concerned with the profession, therefore concern of members is with the proposed entrenchment in a charter of rights and freedoms of a new Canadian constitution, freedom of the press.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 128.
-
Mr. Hawkes: There is another conundrum inside your brief, and in contrast to the testimony we had the other day, They wanted to protect the rights of the fetus, your brief clearly says to us: protect the rights of the woman. There is another group involved in the abortion issue and that is medical personnel. Does your association have a position on their right to refuse to participate in any medical procedure, including the procedure of abortion? Dr. Waters: As far as I know, I am just trying to search my memory now, I think the Canadian Medical Association does have a clause in its Code of Ethics that allows physicians to withhold these services in terms of abortion. I do not think any physician can be expected to perform any act that he finds repugnant, and I am quite sure that, again, I am speaking from memory, that the Canadian Medical Association does respect that. Ms. Pelrine: That clause, however, goes on to say that should the physician, because of personal, moral, religious or ethical beliefs, be unable to perform a particular procedure, he or she is obligated to so inform the patient and to refer the patient to another physician who will perform the procedure. I am certainly prepared to accept that Code of the Canadian Medical Association. Mr. Hawkes: Would the freedom of conscience, which is also contained in this charter, be relevant to that issue? Mr. Kellermann: I think that a doctor might argue that he did not want to perform a particular operation or medical treatment of some kind on the basis of freedom of conscience, but that is fine, I do not think that in any way contradicts the position of CARAL, CARAL’s concern is that there be doctors available for the women who want to choose to have an abortion, and as long as that is guaranteed we are not in any way interested in forcing other doctors to involve themselves in that process. They just do not want other doctors standing in the way of women having that right. Ms. Pelrine: And who indeed would want to submit to any medical procedure performed by an unwilling physician?
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 125-126.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
In Section 2(b). that section gives the impression that the freedom of the press and the media is an individual right. Well, in fact, as we have already pointed out in our report, the freedom of the press is merely a mode by which the general freedom of expression is exercised, it is not a right of an individual as such.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 128.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
Senator Austin: Under section 2, where you see Subparagraph (b), reference to freedom of thought, including freedom of the press and other media of information, Minister, is it the intention to in any way enlarge the present rights as they are so indistinctly understood of the press and other media in Canada? Is it, for example, now open to argue as to protection of sources in the hands of journalists and press and electronic media people? [Page 79] Mr. Chrétien: I do not know how the Court will interpret that, but we are dealing here, we are formalizing the guarantee that exists traditionally in this society concerning the freedom of the press and other media. What will be the interpretation of the Court in terms of the sources of information and so on, it would not be for me, I do not know what the Court will decide or if there will be some different circumstances that will have to be analyzed by the Court before rendering a judgment. Senator Austin: Your attempt here was to be neutral? Mr. Chrétien: As tnuch as possible.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(b)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 127-128.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
One of the things that concerns me about our deliberation is our tendancy to look to the American experience, both in discussing jurisprudence, and it, concerns me a little because I think we are a unique country and our constitution has got to reflect our unique character. We have the built-in advantage, I think at this stage, as some members opposite have pointed out, of amending to some degree our constitution. We have the advantage of one hundred and some years of history, our own history not the American history, and it seems important to me that somehow we balance in this constitution the problems between individual rights and collective rights, such fundamental freedoms of association and religion.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 127.
-
Professor Magnet: But the jurisprudence in the United States to which you refer arises under a constitutional guarantee to nondiscrimination and also to a constitutional guarantee which prevents the establishment of religion. In this proposed resolution there is no antiestablishment clause, and therefore, it simply reflects the Canadian theory which has been true throughout the history of this country that the basic Confederation pact protects certain denominational reasons. Indeed, you might say establishes, but certainly we would not think an antiestablishment clause would be possible in Canada.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 127.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
Do you think that in Section 2, taking Section 2(b), freedom of thought, belief, and opinion or Section 2(a) freedom of religion, will that protect parties in hospital who have been pressured into assisting an abortion if this is entrenched? Dr. DeVeber: I would hope not. I really cannot answer your question but I would think it is a genuine concern. Miss Campbell: Perhaps you did not quite understand. I was looking for a clause in the Bill of Rights or in the proposal that would allow persons to refuse to assist, and you may have misinterpreted it. Dr. DeVeber: I think that is an excellent idea. I would be in favour of putting that clause in. Miss Campbell: Particularly if Section 1 over-rode any statute. So you could see that freedom of religion perhaps being, or belief that the . . . Dr. DeVeber: I think belief is more important because there are more and more doctors I know who are against abortion on demand, not on religious grounds, but just because they believe it is wrong. So it would be beliefs of any kind. Mr. Cooper: May I make a comment here? When the present Criminal Code, the present abortion law was going through the Justice and Legal Affairs Committee [Page 42] there was an attempt made to insert a conscience clause. Now, the then Minister of Justice, Mr. John Turner, said that this would not be necessary. He could not conceive of any doctor or nurse being required to take part in an abortion. Experience has shown since then that he was dead wrong.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 124-125.
-
Mr. Black: It seems to me that the value of including freedom of conscience as well as freedom of religion is that it makes clear that people can have very deeply held beliefs that they might not call religious beliefs, but which are equally fundamental to them, and using the phrase “freedom of conscience” it gives them rights as well as people who deeply hold religious beliefs. It seems to me that the possibility that the Supreme Court of Canada or any other court would interpret that in a way which would hinder law enforcement is nonexistent. I cannot imagine the court giving it any such interpretation.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 116.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
Mr. McGrath: Then how do we avoid getting into the kind of situation which has developed in the United States where, for example, in certain instances, the Lord’s Prayer recited in the classroom has been ruled by the courts to be unconstitutional? I say that as one who comes from a province which has, by law, a denominational system of education which is publicly funded. That law is enshrined in the constitution of Canada by virtue of the terms of union between Newfoundland and [Page 10] Canada, and indeed, is threatened by the provisions of the bill now before us. You have referred to that, though not in a specific way, and I will come back to that later on. Mr. Hammel: But what is the question? Mr. McGrath: The question is: if we are to entrench a Charter of Human Rights in the constitution, how do we avoid the situation whereby the courts of this country will, in fact, be almost in a position of a parallel legislature in terms of defining new laws by the constitution; for example. you could be restricted as to your hiring practices; as to your conduct in the classroom. I have cited the instance in the United States where the recitation of the Lord’s Prayer has, in certain circumstances, been declared unconstitutional. That is a dilemma I find myself in I am very much in favour of fundamental human rights being protected by law, but I have this dilemma. Mr. Hammel: I think whatever approach is taken, whether the statute approach or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms one, I think we simply have to recognize that there are individual rights, and then there are, in our case, organized group rights. In this case, we are dealing with denominational group rights, although, for example, as a Roman Catholic I do not in any way tend to judge anyone’s right to freedom of conscience, I do feel that when he does not abide by what the Roman Catholic religion teaches, then he is no longer a Roman Catholic, and, therefore, does not have the rights of the group. So I think we have to approach it from that particular point of view, that there are certain group rights which are at least equal to, or, perhaps, supreme over some individual rights. I do not think we can simply make it sound as if the individual rights are total.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 126-127.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
Mr. Nystrom: My second and last question, Mr. Chairman, concerns another area where l have admired your organization- the whole question of the conscientious objector. You mentioned this morning, if I heard you correctly, two possibilities: one. enshrining in our constitution that no one should be compelled to take human life against one’s conscience, and you also referred to another option, which is in Federal Republic of Germany, that basically you enshrine that it pertains only to military service. I gather that you prefer the first option, which is more sweeping, that one of you mentioned earlier, the possibility of problems concerning policemen in their work, and firefighters in their work, and getting into the whole abortion controversy and euthanasia and so on. You did mention, I believe, two options: that no one should be compelled to take human life against one’s conscience, and the other option being what is enshrined in the German Republic which, I gather, says the same thing but as it pertains only to military service. Mr. Janzen: We would prefer the more general one in regard to taking human life. Mr. Nystrom: If the Committee or the government in its wisdom did not want to be as sweeping, the second would also cover a very important point, would it not? Mr. Janzen: We would be grateful for what there is.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 124.
-
Mr. Epp: Could I ask you, in page 5, taking your position a little further, you argue that the same rights should be extended to persons working in hospitals, people in the medical field. specifically people who because of conscience cannot accept the taking of life through abortion. Do you feel that the clause that you propose would in fact given them that protection they seek? Mr. Janzen: We are not sure about that. As it stands here we say it might have some implications for that concern, and I think it would suggest something in that direction but we are not sure of that and we have not sought a specific legal opinion. It is a concern to us that we recognize that that is not something on which we have complete clarity. Mr. Epp: Do you have practical demonstration of members of your organization. adherents to your organization of churches that form your constituency. that people have been put into that position, namely of performing medical acts which contravene their conscience and specifically their position that they do not have the right to take life in that form? Mr. Janzen: l do not know of specific personnel from our community. I do know that in the 1977 Badgley report there is [Page 51] some rather strong testimony from doctors and so on who werer subject to considerable pressure and that is the reference for it here.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 123-124.
-
A conscientious objector clause in the Charter might have implications for areas other than military service. People in police work or in medical work sometimes have to face the question of taking human life, too. The areas of euthanasia and abortion are examples but because of technological and other changes the number of areas may increase. In 1969, when the abortion issue was debated in Parliament, along with other amendments to the Criminal Code, it was emphasized that medical personnel would not be forced to be involved with them. Because of this, a conscientious objector clause, which was considered at the time. was viewed as unnecessary, However, the government’s Badgley study of 1977 found that some strong pressures are brought to bear on medical workers. [Page 48] We believe the right to abstain from the taking of human life should be extended in the area of abortion as well.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 122.
-
Mr. W. Janzen (Director General, Ottawa Office, Mennonite Central Committee, Canada): Thank you. This concern is somewhat different than the one which Mr. Nigh has explained. lf that one could be covered with a clause like, “No one shall be compelled against his conscience to take human life,” then the second one might be covered with a simple affirmation of freedom for religion without specifying that it be for individuals or for groups, thus leaving that question to be decided when problems in relation to that arise. As it is worded at the present time in the proposal, it is cast in explicitly individual terms and we are concerned that that might create difficulties which perhaps are not foreseen at the present time or even considered desirable. The written brief refers to several such difficulties and l will not go over that material, but l would say that these difficulties can arise also in relation to communities other than the Amish or Old Order Mennonites or Hutterites which are referred to in the brief. We know that for generations and centuries the phenomenon of people going off unto themselves for religious reasons to live a bit more as a community unto themselves is an experience that has been present in our civilization and probably will be present. and we would like to have that freedom respected. We are a bit concerned that by casting the provision for freedom of religion in individual terms there might be seine difficulties, as explained in the brief. We could go on and talk further about community rights and collective rights and some aspects that relate to the concerns of the native people as well, but I do not think at this point we would want to go into that. I would point out, however, that in a number of other constitutions or bills of rights the provision for freedom of religion is not as individual as it is in the one that is being proposed. I refer to the I960 Canadian Bill of Rights and there is a simple affirmation of freedom for religion without specifying the way it shall apply. The one to which Mr. Nigh has referred also is general on that point. The American constitution, although generally an individualistic document. is general on that point. It does not specify that it is exclusively for individuals and so on. So what we are asking basically is two clauses: one is a clause that would say something to the effect that no one shall be compelled against his conscience to take human life, and the other one would be at simple affirmation of freedom for religion without specifying that it be for individuals or communities, thus leaving that to the wisdom of the legislatures or the courts to deal with those problems as they might arise.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 122-123.
-
Our spiritual forefathers where the anabaptists of western Europe. Over 400 years ago they felt compelled to take a stand against the taking of human life in any form and to many of them it was contrary to their understanding of the teaching of scripture. For their beliefs and practice they suffered cruelly; many died. When our forefathers came to Canada around 200 years ago they appealed for and were promised exemption from military duty. The history of these negotiations which are very much abbreviated are contained in paragraphs on pages 3 and 4 of the brief which you have had in your hands. In World War I, the severe test of these provisions came. In the spring of I918 the German forces made one last gigantic assault on the Western Front and for a while it looked as if the Allied front would break. It was under the stress and desperation of that time that exemptions which had been written through Order in Council by government were cancelled and the young men of our churches had their faith and their convictions severely tested; many served periods in jail. I had hoped to bring along today a very close friend of mine who was my bishop for many years. Mr. B. J. Swalm who is 84 years of age. but he had other commitments and was not able to come. He could articulate his experiences during this war. One thing I remember, while he served as my bishop in the Niagara Area was that when he was visiting our area he would ask me to drive past St. Catharines Jail where he spent several months during World War I. Bishop Swalm was one of the founders of this organization, the Mennonite Central Committee. The experience in World War II was different and here I can speak from personal experience. because I was of draft age at that time and young men of my age were being called into service. My spiritual training and upbringing, church teachings, taught me participation in war was wrong but I had to make a decision at that time that I had to know what I believed personally and I had to make a personal decision. I went through weeks of study and soul-searching which reinforced my teaching and brought me to the decision that I could not take a human life. or be part of a life-taking organization. Now, in the Second World War, because of early representation to government by the leaders of our churches, an alternative service program was developed whereby our young [Page 47] men could serve in non-military forms of service such as reforestation, road-building, fire-fighting, agricultural work and some in ambulance and hospital work on the front lines. As l came through those years and in perspective I have two strong feelings. First of all I have a deep respect for the boys, for the integrity of the boys who were my friends and are still my friends. who did not feel as I and went into military service. and we today wish to acknowledge our deep respect for those who disagree with us in this area. The second was a great appreciation which I also hold today for a country where conscience is recognized and where opportunity was given for alternative forms of service of national value, and service that was helpful to society. I an thankful for a country where the right to be different is recognized: where a minority view does not endanger or dehumanize. So it is for this reason that we feel now in the formulation of a constitution in peaceful times apart from emotional pressures of a wartime society, that we include a clause in the constitution that would recognize the right of conscience that would lead one to abstain from the taking of human life. We are making this presentation today from our own experience and perspective as stated in the brief. which is prepared by Mr. Janzen and which I have briefly summarized. We believe in light of past experience and differences of interpretation and application of past government decisions that a clear and brief. concise statement in the constitution would be helpful and we urge the inclusion of such in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I might just call your attention to the statement that is written in the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany; “No one may be compelled against his conscience to render war service involving the use of arms.”
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 121-122.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
Mr. McGrath: My question is, does Section 2 of the Charter in any way threaten the tax exempt privileges that you now enjoy as a church, in terms of any question that could be placed before the courts; because freedom of religion means freedom not be exposed to religion in certain circumstances, in other words, no religion in terms of interpretation can be construed as a religion, for the purposes of this section. Mr. Smith: Mr. Chairman, it had not occurred to us that this section would in any way threaten our tax exempt status, at least it had not occurred to me, and I do not see any inherent meaning in this. I think along with other sections of the Charter that the possibility for amendment could indeed threaten any of these sections and thereby affect the question before us.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 118.
-
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints or the “Mormon Church’, is a Christian organization with roots in Canada which go back to the early 1830s. There are at present approximately 85,000 members of the Church in Canada, with congregations in every province and the territories. We deeply appreciate the opportunity to appear before this Committee and to comment on some aspects of the proposed resolution respecting the constitution. At the onset, we wish to make it clear that as a church we take no position on the purely political aspects of the proposed resolution; our members are totally free to think and act according to their own individual wishes on those matters. Believing as we do that churches have a responsibility to provide and safeguard a moral framework in which their members can exercise their beliefs, we wish, however, to address some of the possible moral implications of the resolution. Our basic concerns relate to the potential impact of certain proposals within the resolution on the sanctity and strength of the family, on protection provided by society to women and children, on the relationships between courts and legislatures in making legal policy, and on the inviolability of fundamental freedoms. We can perhaps best illustrate these concerns by examining specific sections of the proposed resolution. In doing so, we wish only to point out concerns, not obvious and totally identifiable dangers. Indeed, it is in the vagueness of the wording of certain portions of the proposed resolution that the [Page 8] greatest dangers lie, because it is impossible to tell exactly what is meant or what was contemplated by the draftsmen. Section 2 of the proposed resolution deals with fundamental freedoms. We applaud the apparent intention of the proposals, believing as we do that “no government can exist in peace, except such laws are framed and held inviolate as will secure to each individual the free exercise of conscience, the right and control of property and the protection of life”. Yet we must admit to an uneasiness about the extent to which the proposed resolution actually safeguards the essential freedom it so laudably espouses. Part V of the proposed resolution provides provedures for amending the constitution, either as a result of legislative resolutions or by referendum. These amending procedures apparently do not ensure that legislative action cannot sweep away those fundamental freedoms outlined in Section 2. We strongly believe that freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief, opinion, expression, assembly and association must be very carefully safeguarded; subject only to the reasonable restraints commensurate with a democratic society, they must not be subject to the vagaries, no matter how well intentioned, of legislatures. Past history, our own and others, has taught us the need to place them above legislative action. Unless they are safeguarded, it would be possible, at some time in the future, for legislatures to deny them to one group or another in our society. The procedures for amending the constitution must, we submit, pay particular attention to the absolute need to protect those fundamental freedoms mentioned in Section 2 of the proposed resolution.
§2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), pp. 113-114.
-
-
primarydocuments.ca primarydocuments.ca
-
I would invite anyone to define what religion means in a comprehensive manner. I think that that term, while we know that certain religions, Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism are religions, there will be many borderline cases where we do not know if those groups are religions or not. But that has not precluded the drafters of this Charter form including religion.
§[2] (https://primarydocuments.ca/canada-act-1982/#Fundamental) (2(a)more specifically) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Referenced in Adam Dodek, The Charter Debates (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), p. 116.
-
-
www.ascd.org www.ascd.org
-
Phase 2 is a collaborative phase during which both teachers and students conduct think-aloud demonstrations and minilessons. Teacher modeling in the beginning of the phase gives way to student modeling in the latter half. Students take responsibility for teaching their peers a variety of online reading comprehension strategies. Instruction also begins to move from search skills to critical evaluation and synthesis skills. (See a complete checklist of skills.)
Phase 2: Essentially students and teachers initially have a thinking brainstorm session about the topic/theme. Teacher is the model in the start of this phase and then lets the student take the reigns. Students have responsibility for teaching their peers online reading comprehension strategies. Also moves into critical evaluation and synthesis skills.
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
MP14:
-
-
www.milestonedocuments.com www.milestonedocuments.com
-
Be it known to the readers of this work that this humble slave of the Almighty is going to describe in a correct manner the excellent character,
The person who wrote this a slave describing the emperor
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.milestonedocuments.com www.milestonedocuments.com
-
What ho! my work is in the hall of arms, I listen to no mortal, nor can any put me to shame, I know none such, I am the Terror, I know none other, I am where war is, my work is said to be in the hall of arms, let no one curse my children.
the god of arms openly says he is terror but cares for his people
-
1. Huitzilopochtli is first in rank, no one, no one is like unto him: not vainly do I sing (his praises) coming forth in the garb of our ancestors; I shine; I glitter. 2. He is a terror to the Mixteca; he alone dest
many of the hymns are about how fear the gods are
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
Germination of N.sativaseeds
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
In vitro cytotoxic activity of methanolic extract of N. sativafrom different germination phasesduringSRB assay
-
Cytotoxicity assay by Sulphorhodamine B (SRB) me
-
Germination of N. sativaseeds
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
Activation of TLC plate
-
Tests for Alkaloids
-
Germination of N.sativaseeds
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
Testing of bioformulations
-
Sequence analysis
-
DNA sequencing of the 18S rDNA fragment
-
Purification of PCR product
-
Analysis of internal transcribed spacer region
-
RAPDand SSRscoring and data analysis
-
PCR amplification
-
Running of gel and visualization of DNA
-
Determination of the yield
-
Agarose gel electrophoresis
-
Qualitative and quantitative estimation of DNA
-
Determination of the yield
-
Procedure for DNA isolation
-
Reagents required for fungal DNA isolationand p
-
DNA isolation of Trichodermaisolate
-
Genetic variability analysis through RAPD and SSR
-
Photography, evaluation and documentation
-
Procedurefor SDS-PAGE
-
Materialsrequired for SDS-PAGE
-
Protein profiling of bioagent through SDS-PAGE
-
Assayof xylanase activity
-
Dinitrosalicylate reagent (DNS)(per liter)
-
Sterilization
-
Effect of temperature on growth of bioagent
-
Identificationof bioagent
-
Isolation and purification of Trichoderma sp.
-
Sterilization of media and distilled water
-
Source of chemicals
Tags
- md-1-md-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-9
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-6
- mt-9-mt-8-mt-1-mt-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-8
- md-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-5
- mt-3-mt-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-1
- md-1-md-2-mt-1
- md-2-md-1
- mt-6-mt-6-mt-2-mt-1
- mt-6-mt-2
- mt-7-mt-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-2
- md-1-md-2-mt-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-10
- mt-9-mt-8-mt-2
- mt-9-mt-2
- md-12-md-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-3
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-11
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-12
- mt-2
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-7
- md-1-md-2-mt-3
- md-2-md-11-md-1-md-4
Annotators
URL
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
Prevalence of extracellular virulence factors in Vibriofrom shrimp farm
-
Gel documentation and image analysis
-
Screening for virulence genes in V. parahaemolyticusfrom Cochin estuary, shrimp farm and seafood
-
Bacterial strains used
-
DNAisolation
-
Detection of virulence genes tdhand trhby multiplex
-
Detection of type III secretion system genes
-
Production of Lipase
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
MAR indexingand antibiotic resistance pattern amon
-
Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom shrimp farm
-
Detection of blaTEMgene
-
MAR indexing
-
Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom Cochin estu
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.in
-
Species level identification and distribution of Vibriospecies in Cochin estuary
-
Gel documentation and image analysis
-
Detection of toxR gene
-
Detection of tlhgene
-
Extraction of genomic DNA
-
Detection of V. parahaemolyticusspecies-specific gene
-
PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene
-
Carbohydrate fermentation test
-
Oxidase test
-
Analysis of hydrographical parameters
-
Carbohydrate fermentation tes
-
Oxidase tes
-
Analysis of hydrographical parameters
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.inChapter 416
-
Active site identification, metal detection and interaction of Dof domain structure
-
Superposition of the Dof domain with predicted 3D structure
-
Validation of the predicted 3D structure
-
Tertiary structural prediction
-
Chromosomal locations
-
Phylogenetic and motif analysi
-
In silico characterization of cloned Dof gene
-
Phylogenetic and motif analysis of sequenced Dof domains
-
In silico characterization of sequenced Dof domains of cereal
-
Sequencing of Dof domain and gene
-
Cloning of Dof genes of sorghum using pBSK vector
-
Cloning of Dof domain and Dof genes using pGEM-T Easy
-
Gel elution of PCR products
-
PCR based cloning, sequencing and in silico characterization of Dof domain and Dofgenes of cereals and millet
-
PCR amplification of Dof gene
-
Primer designing for PCR amplification of Dof domain and Do
-
-
sg.inflibnet.ac.in sg.inflibnet.ac.inChapter 310
-
Active site prediction and docking study
-
Superposition of predicted structure and template (Dof
-
Validations
-
Three dimensional structure prediction, refinements and evaluation of Dof proteins
-
Cis-regulatory element analysis
-
Mapping of SbDof genes on sorghum chromosomes and its intron/exon gene structure prediction
-
In silico prediction of Dof gene family members in S. bicolor (L
-
Motif identification
-
Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
-
In silico analysis of sequenced Dof domain and Dof genes
-