Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
The authors set out to characterize the genetic architecture for aposematic color polymorphism in a species of tiger moths. It was previously known that the color polymorphism showed a non-sex-linked Mendelian inheritance pattern, and was thus likely controlled by an allelic change at a single autosomal locus. Based on observations in other species that traits with a similar simple inheritance pattern of polymorphic aposematic colors often involve supergenes, which refers to a tightly linked cluster of co-adapted loci, the authors tested the hypotheses that a supergene may be involved here in tiger moth polymorphism. To test this hypothesis, they used a combination of QTL mapping, GWAS, and RNA-seq approaches to identify regions of the genome that showed an association with the color pattern polymorphism. The genetic mapping approaches identified a candidate genomic region that contained >20 genes, including the genes yellow-e, and its paralog, valkea. The RNA-seq data showed these genes to be expressed differently in the developing wings of the different color morphs. The valkea paralog is associated with a duplicated chromosomal region that appears to only be present in the genomes of yellow-colored morphs. A phylogenetic-weighting approach was also used to attempt to distinguish the strength of associations of the yellow-e and valkea genes with the color polymorphism and found evidence suggesting valkea was the likely genetic switch for the color polymorphism. Lastly, the authors provide evidence that the differences in coloration involve a change in melanins, through chemical characterization of pigments extracts. Collectively, the authors provide a comprehensive examination of the color pattern genetics and compelling evidence that the polymorphism in pigmentation is controlled by an allelic change at a single autosomal locus that includes the yellow-e/valkea genes that show different expression patterns in the differently colored morphs.
Strengths:<br /> This study provides a comprehensive mapping effort to identify a locus responsible for modulating adaptive variation in natural populations of the tiger moth. This is an ideal trait and system to study the genetic basis of adaptive variation, as the trait variation has clear impacts on fitness and is under strong selection in natural populations. The genomes of Lepidoptera and their amenability for laboratory research and molecular methods make them well-suited for such mapping efforts. The authors used an impressive number of offspring from genetic crosses to conduct QTL mapping, which was nicely complemented with a population genomic GWAS approach to further narrow the candidate locus. The addition of the RNA-seq provides compelling evidence that genes at this locus are clearly involved in differences in wing pattern development.
The greatest strength of this study is perhaps its finding of "something new, using something old". I am referring to the finding of a novel duplication of the yellow gene being involved in pigment variation. Yellow is well-known to be involved in color pattern development in Drosophila and butterflies, but its role in the tiger moths is completely novel. A recent duplication of yellow being involved in adaptive variation is completely new and quite exciting. With other recent examples of gene duplications being involved in differences in butterfly color pattern development, there are now numerous cases of the rapid evolution of gene duplicates involved in generating wing pattern variation. Thus, the findings here should be of broad interest to those interested in the genetic changes involved in generating adaptive variation in natural populations.
Another strength of the study is the characterization of the melanic pigment changes involved in the polymorphism. Such detailed phenotypic analyses can offer critical insights into how the genetic differences found to be associated with color pattern variation, may function and influence wing pattern development.
Weaknesses:<br /> Despite narrowing the locus to a small number of genes through mapping efforts, the study falls short in identifying the genetic switch and sufficient evidence to confirm valkea's role in the color polymorphism.
The mapping efforts identified a narrow locus covering multiple genes from the yellow gene family and RNA-seq data clearly identified valkea and yellow-e as being differentially expressed between color morphs thereby implicating their involvement in differences in wing color pattern development. However, the type and number of genetic changes at this locus involved in generating the color polymorphism remain unresolved. Tree topology provides only suggestive evidence that genotypes at valkea show a stronger association with color pattern differences than at the other nearby yellow genes, and offers limited further resolution as the where the genetic switch may be (e.g. within coding or non-coding regions across the locus).
I am unconvinced that framing this study as a test for the role of a supergene, or "to test whether the polymorphism is associated with large structural rearrangements controlling multiple phenotypic elements, or the result of a single gene mutation" is most appropriate or strengthens the study. The alternative hypotheses of "large structural rearrangements" versus "single gene mutation" do not necessarily reflect the possible, or most likely hypotheses, and neither are not necessarily clearly supported by the results of the study. In other studies of wing color pattern polymorphisms in butterflies, the genetic changes controlling the variation have been non-coding mutations in putative cis-regulatory elements (CREs) that control the expression of a nearby gene involved in wing pattern development (see examples from Heliconius butterflies). These would be considered changes in CREs, not "single gene mutations". There are instances in which such changes impacting color pattern variation have been captured within structural rearrangements, such as polymorphic inversions of Heliconius numata, the single gene or CRE mutation and structural rearrangements both being involved are not mutually exclusive, thus it is difficult to frame this study as testing them as alternative hypotheses. The data presented in the study celery implicate a genomic region with multiple genes differentially expressed (DE) between color morphs, with one of the DE genes residing within a structural variation (insertion/deletion polymorphism). However, the study is unable to resolve if the large structural rearrangement is involved, or if a single versus multiple genes or CRE changes may be involved. Thus, I find it challenging and perhaps a weakness of the paper to frame the study as a test of these alternative hypotheses that are not necessarily mutually exclusive or able to be distinguished using the data in the study. I have similar concerns with the focus on supergenes (i.e. co-adapted gene complex) being a weakness for the paper, as the results of the study don't directly test for the presence or role of a co-adapted gene complex at the locus identified.