Well-documented?

Probably "the"

Confirmed that this should be \(bdy(epi(f))\), not \(bdy(dom(f))\)

Strange typo for an Apple-focused site.

This word has double stress.

Typo: a recent

Typo: missing a

Minor typo in the description of the Bill

should be "diseases"

remove this word: age

Should this be req.param['_id'] ? Or req.param._id ?

There are two elements with the same id. Was this one supposed to have an id of 'delete'?

{cringe}

Should be AActor

Should be UObject?

Should be:

UE_LOG(LogTemp, Log, TEXT("Found UObject named: %s"), *(CurrentObject->GetName()));

1. Typo in "... more easily then..." change "then" to "than"

2. The parentheses in the first part "(especially the well-off)" doesn't match the next lack of parentheses around "poor populations" -- they're both referencing the same subject, and so the logical connection doesn't make sense to me.

TL;DR: The sentence should still make sense with parentheses removed.

Test: "Humans are able to stay afloat more easily then poor populations..."

Does it make sense? Not to my mind (unless you're ironically implying that poor populations are inhuman! maybe a sarcastic remark on those who seem to think/feel that way?).

Consider changing this to: "Well-off populations of humans are able to stay afloat more easily than poor populations..."

... or something else that leaves the connections consistent.

descent

Examining

Broken sentence, but can't quite figure out what's wrong.

should be: 'said one of the'

• change 'on' to 'one'
• delete the first instance of 'the'

1) TYPO: 'it was to early to tell.': change the first instance of 'to' -> 'too'

It will then read: 'it was too early to tell.'

2) Given the close proximity of two instances of 'too' (the first being the last word in the speaker's quotation, the second being our now-corrected typo)... consider replacing one of those instances with some other equivalent.

The first instance would be easier, but less casual-sounding, to replace; options include:

• 'also'
• 'as well'

The second instance would be a bit trickier; options include:

• '{As of this writing | At press time}, that's still an open question.'
• ', it was yet unclear.'
• ', it was yet unclear what the outcome would be.'
• ', it wasn't yet clear.'

.... This said, my immediate thought is that 'it was too early to tell' is an open, receptive/neutral, and -- importantly -- potentially optimistic phrasing. I.e., "We don't know yet! The future could hold anything!"

That's a much more optimistic outlook, compared to terms like 'unclear' -- that seems murky and potentially doubtful to my mind.

So I like the way you phrased it initially.

• consider whether or not to lower-case the M in "Making." (I should probably ask an experienced copywriter or professional editor, actually... There is probably a "one right answer" in this instance, although I'm not certain.)

• Change it's to its (that is, remove the apostrophe)

The possessive form of "it" is an irregular form of possessive in lacking an apostrophe, probably to avoid confusion with the contraction of "it is."

(This is yet another grammar rule I memorized in public schools. :p)

Strictly speaking, semi-colons are only used to separate clauses which could, on their own (as they stand), each be a grammatically complete sentence. The test? [You'll notice that last remark wasn't a grammatically complete sentence, by the way.]

Replace the semi-colon with a period; see if it works.

Replace the semi-colon with a period. See if it works.

"A challenge" isn't a grammatically complete sentence. Of course, stylistic licenses are sometimes taken to defy the rule of "every clause between two periods must be a complete sentence."

In this case, though, I'd suggest:

• adding a repetition of "it is" after the semi-colon (to make it complete-sentence-worthy): 'It is a question; it is a challenge.', OR
• replacing the semi-colon and substituting a colon in its place. (This also has the advantage, in my mind, of making it a 'stronger' statement: throwing down a challenge.): 'It is a question: a challenge.', OR
• both: 'It is a question: it is a challenge.'

Either or both should work. (Personally, I like the second option best: 'It is a question: a challenge.' ) That said, if you prefer it the way it is for style, go for it. It just stuck out in my mind, but I am a fiend for proper (or obsessive) semi-colon usage.

insert a space between the comma and the open-quote.

NOTE: On the website (html version), the lack of a space is clearly visible.

(Although visually, in this pdf, it looks like there is a space -- but there actually isn't!! ... It's just how the pdf is rendering on my screen that gives the illusion of a space-character being present. If you try to highlight it, you'll notice there's no extra character between the comma and the quote-mark.)

typo: insert "of", as so: "instead of against"

change to "fueling" (one L).

• "fuelling": turns out, this is the UK / Commonwealth spelling (with two L's).
• "fueling": this is the US spelling (with one L). In the US, the word "fuel" -- regardless of any word-form it takes -- always has only one (1) "L."

side note: I am all in favour of using British or Commonwealth spelling! If so, then it should be consistent across the entire published work (but I didn't think that it was your intent to use British spelling here ;p).

delete the word "is"

Consider removing the period at the end of this list.

It's a stylistic or slight syntax concern: maintain the existing conventions already in place (no periods at the end of list-items). NB: Other editors might disagree with me in this instance.... IMO, it appears a little more awkward than if it were left out, but that's pretty subjective.

change 'and' to 'an'

needs a period, AFTER the closing of the parenthesis, like so:

(or if you would be if you knew that at least 1000 people would be out there with you).

change 'spontaneously' to:

• either 'spontaneous',
• or 'spontaneously organized' (with or without a hyphen should work)

insert a hyphen: "24-hour"

(I'm relatively certain this is the most widely-accepted way of writing it; other interpretations are possible, but I think the hyphen applies here.)

change: move the period, so it's inside the quotation mark.

Placing commas and periods inside dialogue quotation marks is proper syntax/grammar in normal writing. .... It's improper syntax only in technical/computer writing. However, it's possible that -- stylistically -- this may have changed in recent years, as technical (and technology) writers have influenced mainstream writing somewhat.

change "Said" to lower-case "s"

My understanding of strict grammar rules, with regard to writing numbers, is as follows:

• When writing a number less than ten, one spells the number (and refrains from writing the digits).
• When writing a number greater than 10, one writes the digits (e.g., 24).

(Side note: I don't recall what the rule is for the number ten itself!)

Anyway, that being said: My sense is that in journalistic writing (and in fiction, and in novels), one can take stylistic licenses; it's entirely up to you, based on what style, context and goals you have in mind.

If it were me, I'd spell it out (but it's your call): "but three is still pretty good."

Flip the X and X' in X -> X'

Shouln't there be a space between "2,000", and "calorie"?

"share ~the~ a fundamental"

cannot

...In Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda & Athina Sioupi (eds.), Zwischen Kern und Peripherie ;)

There are many Index-entries which appears twice or in this case 4 times. It is probably a problem of the scope of \index \index{\textbf{x}} =/= \index{x}

an

an N

that?

*gets

This paragraph does not build a sense-unit with the example before, and should be therefore indented, similar to the next paragraph beginning with Interjections.

without "."

subdivided

an

an

trick

a sentence

"changed in"

These vertical bars do not seem to work for me, in either the regular input mode or ":paste" mode.

lower case

to beat random search in a carefully-chosen intervals.

remove the "a"?

That is, we are generating a random random with a uniform distribution, but then raising it to the power of 10.

The word random is repeated?

True to the denominator term in the RMSprop update

remove the word dropout?

theoretical convergence guarantees

update that has recently

appears as a slightly more interpretable (remove first more)

can have sizes in the millions parameters can have millions of parameters

Maybe it should be: hack the code to remove the regularization loss contribution.

Typo

\(x_i\) is scaled

The figure above has a value of 1.04 for the softmax case. I think that should be \(0.452\).

Typo. Grammar.

The synapses are not just a single weight ,but a complex non-linear dynamical system

The usual spelling is "no one" and to a lesser extent "no-one". Just nit-picking. B-)

typo: drop-out

Typo/grammar: The motivation for this is based on a compromise and an equivalent analysis

Editorial nitpicking: spaced en dash needed here :)

Double-space here

typo? or just confusion grammar?

Another issue that should be addressed

cease

cease