- Jan 2022
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
crowds of people, with cattle being herded into transports; and people crammed into bunks, with chickens in a battery farm.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Noncentral Fallacies: links humans to Nazis in the eyes of animals to create emotion.
-
Other images compare children behind barbed wire with a picture of pigs looking out from behind bars;
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Confirmation bias? ignoring the fact that humans need food to survive so they compare it to babies being killed.
-
what Jews and others went through in the Holocaust is what animals go through every day in factory farms."
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Red herring: Because animals are being treated like "what Jews and others went through in the Holocaust", people should be aware that the animals are having a holocaust of their own. This evidence is misleading because it is justifying Prescotts actions to move forward with the images.
-
had expected it to elicit criticism.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Rogerian thesis: with the knowledge that people will disagree with these ads, Prescott attempted to bring emotion with the help of Jewish history to attempt to stop the number of animals being killed every day.
-
The campaign, he added, was funded by a Jewish philanthropist, who wished to remain anonymous.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
I think this is anonymous authority: says he was being funded by a Jewish philanthropist who wishes to stay anonymous. Either he wasn't actually being funded and he said he was to give him even more of a reason to continue with the project, or he was being respectful. probably shouldn't include this then.
-
Mr Prescott is Jewish and lost several relatives in Nazi concentration camps. The campaign, he added, was funded by a Jewish philanthropist, who wished to remain anonymous. He said he had expected it to elicit criticism.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
This has got to be some kind of fallacy. I'll add a comment later when I find it. But, Prescott being Jewish himself still went through with the project, even being the campaign creator. With the knowledge that these images would receive a lot of backlash, he still went through with the project without a single reason why he thought it was acceptable, except a quote from earlier where he compared humans to nazis when it comes to killing animals. He was also being funded by a Jewish philanthropist so maybe it was for the money.
-
we want to those we decide are 'different or inferior' - is what allows us to commit atrocities against animals every single day."
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Red Herring (I think, cause this evidence is irrelevant): Matt Prescot explains that "we can do anything we want to those we decide are 'different or inferior'" which leads to his belief that because humans feel animals are inferior, humans kill them which is the "same mindset that made the holocaust possible".
-
-
Local file Local file
-
“To Animals, All People Are Nazis”
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Noncentral Fallacies: links humans to Nazis in the eyes of animals to create emotion.
-
"The fact is, all animals feel pain, fear and loneliness,"
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Faulty analogy, animals don't have the ability to comprehend things the way humans do.
-
that we can do anything we want to those we decide are 'different or inferior' - is whatallows us to commit atrocities against animals every single day."
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Red Herring (I think, cause this evidence is irrelevant): Matt Prescot explains that "we can do anything we want to those we decide are 'different or inferior'" which leads to his belief that because humans feel animals are inferior, humans kill them which is the "same mindset that made the holocaust possible".
-
Mr Prescott is Jewish and lost several relatives in Nazi concentration camps. The campaign, headded, was funded by a Jewish philanthropist, who wished to remain anonymous. He said hehad expected it to elicit criticism.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
This has got to be some kind of fallacy. I'll add a comment later when I find it. But, Prescott being Jewish himself still went through with the project, even being the campaign creator. With the knowledge that these images would receive a lot of backlash, he still went through with the project without a single reason why he thought it was acceptable, except a quote from earlier where he compared humans to nazis when it comes to killing animals. He was also being funded by a Jewish philanthropist so maybe it was for the money.
-
had expected it to elicit criticism.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Rogerian thesis: with the knowledge that people will disagree with these ads, Prescott attempted to bring emotion with the help of Jewish history to attempt to stop the number of animals being killed every day.
-
what Jews and others went through in the Holocaust is what animals go through every dayin factory farms."
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Red herring: Because animals are being treated like "what Jews and others went through in the Holocaust", people should be aware that the animals are having a holocaust of their own. This evidence is misleading because it is justifying Prescotts actions to move forward with the images.
-
“Baby Butchers”
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
Confirmation bias? ignoring the fact that humans need food to survive so they compare it to babies being killed.
-
The campaign, headded, was funded by a Jewish philanthropist, who wished to remain anonymous.
ANJIELI FAIRBANKS:
I think this is anonymous authority: says he was being funded by a Jewish philanthropist who wishes to stay anonymous. Either he wasn't actually being funded and he said he was to give him even more of a reason to continue with the project, or he was being respectful. probably shouldn't include this then.
-