- Nov 2017
-
wrapping.marthaburtis.net wrapping.marthaburtis.net
-
Digital Pedagogy Lab Institute
-
- Jul 2016
-
medium.com medium.com
-
not to conference content, but to up-to-date conversations in the education field
Lots of (welcome) “product/process” talk during #DigPed PEI.
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
shift agency for learning to the learner
We share this goal. Maybe we focus too much on it. Maybe it’s just a new spin on an old idea. But it’s nice to have a group of pedagogues who want the same thing in this world.
-
-
www.huffingtonpost.com www.huffingtonpost.com
-
Stop Teaching
Via #DigPed. Sounds like an opportunity to followup on some tates from yesterday.
-
- Jun 2016
-
www.amicalnet.org www.amicalnet.org
-
It would be like saying the utensils you use to cook are irrelevant to the food you produce - when we all know the difference a pot or oven can make, regardless of content.
While it’s easy to agree with the thrust of this piece (pretty much a Langdon Winner-style “LMS have politics”), this needs not follow. When we say that it’s not primarily about the tool, we’re not saying that tools don’t matter, that LMS affordances are irrelevant, that the exact same learning experience would occur whether or not we used tools. We’re saying that the tool is part of a broader equation, not the ultimate focal point. There’s a very general “fault line” (in seismological terms), a distinction to be made between technopedagogy and “EdTech”. As with any distinction, it shouldn’t be carried too far and there’s obviously a whole lot of overlap. But there clearly are actions which are technocentred. A common orientation in EdTech is towards the tools themselves (listicles about apps, inspira-/promotional videos, etc.) with sound pedagogy following naturally from “tried and true”, “studies have shown” “best practices”. This may sound like a caricature but “you know the type”. On the other hand, technopedagogy tends to be oriented towards high-concept “think pieces” with enough namedrops (from Freire and Vygotsky to Illich and Dewey) to require an encyclopedia. Again, a caricature. But we also “know the type”. In this “camp”, the #DigPedPosse has been quite prominent over the last little while. Despite being attracted to this sphere of agency, got several hints that “people need practical solutions to solve the simple problems in their everyday teaching”.
Sooo… This is a minor quibble, as the rest of the piece does resonate with me (apart from the serious issue, near the end). But, given its location so early in the post, it’s important to acknowledge.
-
- Apr 2016
-
gamesandlearning.wordpress.com gamesandlearning.wordpress.com
-
A who’s who of open pedagogy scholars and web annotation advocates joined, too, including Maha Bali, Robin DeRosa, Jamila Siddiqui, Joe Dillon, Jeremy Dean, Alexandre Enkerli, and Roy Kamada.
Flattery will lead us nowhere… But it’s still a warm and fuzzy feeling to be in such illustrious company.
-