15 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2017
    1. Etymologies in Action

      So far, this is an issue investigation report.

    2. This controversy

      This post isn't about a term yet; it's about the controversy over PED's and the HOF. Not the same.

    3. this the “Steroid Era” when

      Is this the term you'll focus on?

    4. n the hall of fame? G

      Is this the term you'll focus on?

    5. It has been several controversy topics in the world recently and most topics consist in politics, sports, and technology. The topic I find most interesting is sports. I chose sports because I feel it has a better impact on me and my daily routines through life.

      Your writing gets interesting when it begins with your personal story. Thiese first few sentences are too general to be meaningful.

    1. “Zakkon Dratenko | Steroid Era – ZAK | 2015”

      Very useful to include the graphics, even the Twitter image...

    2. This source was helpful only because it gave me more than 2 sides or reasons to induct the “Steroid Era Players”

      Good. WHare are the "more than 2"?

    3. The author specific purpose was to educate people that was not just baseball fans but anybody who concerned on the topic to give them extra information for their final decision of yes or no.

      Why write this sentence? What good does it do for whom?

    4. The author for this article is Matt McHugh. Matt is qualified because The Aragon Outlook supports him to get his article qualified on there website.

      Just because a news source publishes what someone writes doesn't make him qualified to speak on a particular subject. I found Matt McHugh and turns out he's a journalism student: Matt McHugh (@mattmcsports27) is a sophomore studying journalism. He’s from the Bay Area and only roots for the good local sports teams (A’s, Raiders, Warriors and Sharks). His favorite sport is baseball, and hopes one day to get paid for doing something related to it. He likes dishing out hot takes (Derek Carr for MVP) and enjoys bumping some good ol’ country music in his spare time.

      https://wnursports.com/staff/

      Is this a high-quality source then?

    5. he author is Sports World and sports world were qualified by YouTube.com

      Who is "Sports World"? and what does "qualified by YouTube" mean? What's interesting about this YouTube post as a source is that it's really a PRIMARY source. It's the data itself, not someone analyzing or commenting on or editing that source, that's why this AB ends up being a summary and not an analysis of the source's usefulness.

  2. Sep 2017
    1. That’s why the Hall of Fame does represent and should represent: “a place for the best baseball players ever”.

      So isn't it debatable as to whether they're the greatest if they needed PEDs to achieve their "greatness"?

    2. entally or physically

      So what are the other POVs?

    3. All of these All-Stars had no thought of breaking the rules it was more to just have fun and be better than the best.

      Not true. Most of them hid the fact that they took PEDs and they lied about it.

    4. During this era

      What years are we talking about here?

    5. e PEDs.

      What are PEDs? What does it stand for?