historical circumstances dctennine the characteristics and purposes of social institutions and individual actions
Cf. Rickert's rhetorics
6 Matching Annotations
- Feb 2019
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
.
This section brings to mind Rickert's rhetorics.
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
different countries and re-mote ages, wherein the speakers and writers had very different notions, tempers, customs, orna-ments, and figures of speech, &c., every one of which influenced the signification of their words
Brings to mind Rickert's rhetorics and Siegert's cultural techniques
-
- Jan 2019
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
StrongDefenseofrhetoricposthumousl
Lanham says, "The Strong Defense assumes that truth is determined by social dramas, some more formal than others but all man-made. Rhetoric in such a world is not ornamental but determinative, essentially creative" (156). If that defense is not just restricted to "man-made" social dramas but cultural dramas, to dramas rooted in a particular historical and cultural context (joining Rickert's sense of rhetorics), then it can also be opened up to material forces beyond the human.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
a set of technologically inter-linkedmaterial culture
This resonates with many of the other articles: Rickert's materialist rhetorics, Barad's materiality, ...
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
material forms.
Placing rhetorics in a realm beyond the typical verbal/written/oral/aural.
-