8 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2022
    1. It seems like it could be a good game but its really poorly executed,
    2. Unique concept that could have end up as a great game, but sadly got destroyed by lack of polish .
  2. Apr 2021
    1. That should make for interesting puzzles, except they're timed, your guys never stop moving (why not?), and the camera and controls mean it's very hard to translate intent into the game world.
    1. Actually a very interesting concept allthough not perfectly executed (even considering it's based on a board game)
    2. It's a nice idea but godawful implementation.
    3. Unfortunately, it’s in the execution where “US and THEM” starts to fall apart. The game’s major problems stem from the user interface and some design choices range from questionable to downright horrible. For starters, the world map that takes up more than half of the screen can be neither scrolled nor zoomed. In a game where your interaction heavily relies on clicking various nations, this becomes a problem. While larger countries like Canada, the US and Russia are easily accessible, smaller nations require pixel perfect accuracy to interact with. Try clicking on Cuba, Ireland or Hungary and you’ll find yourself maniacally clicking shades and outlines and a handful of visible pixels in the area of these countries in vain hope that the game will acknowledge your actions.