4 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2019
  2. Feb 2019
    1. m. +

      didn't catch adding subfield here; our bad, but i feel like this should have been caught?

    2. 0 \0$aH

      The value in the original 490 is a 4XX in the provided series statement; it is incorrect, but that's not really Marcive's fault

    3. a. E

      this should have $l; could clean up locally, but shouldn't they be able to catch this?