but individuals have an obligation to obey the ruler regardless of any specific agreemen
blurry idea of consent means that transition from state of war/nature to good society is not so clear after all?
but individuals have an obligation to obey the ruler regardless of any specific agreemen
blurry idea of consent means that transition from state of war/nature to good society is not so clear after all?
fear can lead people to give their consent to the sovereign
isnt that just cont the state of nature/war as fear
state of nature and how it relates to international relations
realism anarchy
natural parental authority and the rights of mothers.
this is interesting cos not only does he include the personal into the political which seems a bit contradictory, but also in his awful state of nature i would argue that women still occupy similar roles so what does this have to do with his perfect society?
umans had equal rights to everything, even if someone else took something first
right to nature
ntial threat to each other and there is no way to generate a hierarchy or enforceable moral standards.
but how does this sovereign come about then?
state of nature where there is no political power and life is characterized by conflict and equality.
mechanism like the state is needed to enforce common terms and definitions about the world
having a state, a sovereign gives meaning to things, without it there is nothing meaningful so anything (bad) can happen
rong government, there would be constant war and death
no one to lead