1 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2020
  2. twitter.com twitter.com
    Daniël Lakens on Twitter: "Maybe it's time for a 'worst COVID-19 study' competition. ✅p > 0.05 = no effect fallacy ✅difference between significant and non-significant is itself not significant ✅ unbelievably large effect sizes ✅ small n correlational study with huge confounds ✅0.04 < p < 0.06 https://t.co/6ARxujR8ok" / Twitter
    1
    1. edampf 02 Jun 2020

      Daniël Lakens on Twitter

      is:twitter lang:en preprint COVID-19 bad science research peer review worst article
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/lakens/status/1261931079067369472