What follows is a flexible, four-part lens for evaluating key possible dimensions of a CTL’s work — hub, incubator, temple, sieve — derived from a heuristic developed by others to categorize the literature on purposes of higher education (Stevens, Armstrong, & Arum, 2008).
Interesting way to use an object as a way to describe the work of CTLs--hub, incubator, temple, sieve
Because documentation of student learning impacts may not reflect the core objectives of all CTLs — and because this investigation is resource-intensive
Measuring impact of on student learning outcomes is resource-intensive. This makes me think of the Tracer project.
online presence
Measuring the impact of a new faculty program using institutional data
CTL outreach
PD for CTLs
Faculty Development Center
Pedagogical Practice
Great list of teaching resources!
teaching and learning resources
Developing Excellence in Eastern’s Professors: DEEP
NEW ADJUNCT FACULTY OUTREACH: MAKING A CONNECTION
Connecting the Dots:A Proposed Accountability Method for Evaluating the Effi cacy of Faculty Development and Its Impact on Student Outcomes
Moving Toward the Center: The Integration of Educational Development in an Era of Historic Change in Higher Education
“It seems like there’s less introducing of brand-new technology in teaching and learning, as opposed to really thinking more about how do you teach well with it.”
Or do you even need to teach with it?
Learning Community
Never eliminate one-on-one consultation opportunities.