Case: IP #4 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 41; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 36

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2278C>T p.Arg760Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100208

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1614050) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6046726-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #3 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 52; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 41; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2278C>T p.Arg760Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100208

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1614050) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6046726-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 36; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.-411T>C

HGVS:

ClinVarID: not found

CAID: not found

gnomAD: absent

**MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.+167G>T

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2278C>T p.Arg760Cys

ClinVarID: 100208

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1614050) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6046726-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: n.a.

DiseaseAssertion: VWD 2N

FamilyInfo: n.a.

ParentalGenotype(s):n.a.

CasePresentingHPOs:n.a.

CaseHPOFreeRext:n.a.

CaseNOTHPOs:n.a.

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:n.a.

CasePreviousTesting:n.a.

GenotypingMethod:n.a.

PreviouslyPublished: If applicable.n.a.

Gene:VWF

Variant:NM_000552.5(VWF):c.2278C>T (p.Arg760Cys)

HGVS:NM_000552.5:c.2278C>T

ClinVarID:100208

CAID:n.a.

gnomAD:n.a.