8 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2026
    1. 6–8 U (2A/1) c.3437A > G p.Tyr1146Cys 26 D3-TIL3 htz Missense A/na/na 17/17/17 17/35/26 22/35/71

      Case: IP #8 in type U VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs:

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 71

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

    2. 6–8 U (2A/1) c.3437A > G p.Tyr1146Cys 26 D3-TIL3 htz Missense A/na/na 17/17/17 17/35/26 22/35

      Case: IP #7 in type U VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs:

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 35; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 35

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

    3. 6–8 U (2A/1) c.3437A > G p.Tyr1146Cys 26 D3-TIL3 htz Missense A/na/na 17/17/17 17/35/26 22

      Case: IP #6 in type U VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 22

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

    4. 18-20Type2A (IIE)c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys 26 D3-TIL-3htz Missense na/A/A19.3/12/299/5/18 30

      Case: IP #18

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs:

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 19.3; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

    5. 18-20Type2A (IIE)c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys 26 D3-TIL-3htz Missense na/A/A19.3/12/299/5/18 30/24CSA/na

      Case: IP #20

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 29; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 18; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

    6. 9 U c.3437A > Gc.3539–10T > G Np.Tyr1146Cys-2625D3-TIL-3D3-TIL-3htzhtzMissenseSplice SiteO 12 10 21

      Case: IP #9 in type U VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 21

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

      MultipleGeneVariants:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3539–10T>G

      ClinVarID: not found

      **gnomAD: absent

    7. 18-20Type2A (IIE)c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys 26 D3-TIL-3htz Missense na/A/A19.3/12/299/5/18 30/24

      Case: IP #19

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 24

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3437A>G

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 31009

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

    1. rs2676073266132007c.3437A > G26p.Y1146C1042A

      Case: n.a.

      DiseaseAssertion: VWD 2A

      FamilyInfo: n.a.

      ParentalGenotype(s):n.a.

      CasePresentingHPOs:n.a.

      CaseHPOFreeRext:n.a.

      CaseNOTHPOs:n.a.

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:n.a.

      CasePreviousTesting:n.a.

      GenotypingMethod:n.a.

      PreviouslyPublished: If applicable.n.a.

      Gene:VWF

      Variant:NM_000552.5(VWF):c.3437A>G (p.Tyr1146Cys)

      HGVS:NM_000552.5:c.3437A>G

      ClinVarID:31009

      CAID:n.a.

      gnomAD:n.a.