6 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2013 Oct 25, DAVID SANDERS commented:

      It has been argued that this article should be retracted on the basis of analysis of the statistical data presented in it.

      http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/despite-refutation-science-arsenic-life-paper-deserves-retraction-scientist-argues

      http://www.periodicplayground.com/blog/bp/2013/02/guest-post-david-sanders-why-its-high-time-to-retract-arseniclife


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2013 Oct 25, DAVID SANDERS commented:

      It has been argued that this article should be retracted on the basis of analysis of the statistical data presented in it.

      http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/despite-refutation-science-arsenic-life-paper-deserves-retraction-scientist-argues

      http://www.periodicplayground.com/blog/bp/2013/02/guest-post-david-sanders-why-its-high-time-to-retract-arseniclife


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.