On 2015 Mar 09, Dana Ullman commented:
Jim Woodgett's comment is very typical of skeptics of homeopathy. First, homeopaths do not manufacturer their own homeopathic drugs, just as conventional physicians are not "drug manufacturers."
The researchers at India's Institute of Technology (IIT)(none of which were homeopaths) used standard homeopathic manufacturing methods to make the six different medicines, and using three different types of spectroscopy, the researchers found nanoparticles of each of the original medicines in the final solutions, despite dilutions of 1:100 six times, 30 times, and 200 times (with the typical 40 vigorous succussions/shakings of the solutions in-between each dilution).
Woodgett and his ilk are very humorous in suggesting that homeopathic medicines are "contaminated" with the precise "medicine" that was placed in the original water solution and that is listed on the label of the drug.
It is helpful when skeptics of homeopathy expose their ignorance of the subject in which they vigorously attack, and it is additionally typical that they maintain a deep arrogance despite their ignorance (this is a poor combination of characteristics for those of us who are truly interested in maintaining a good and healthy scientific attitude). What is worse is that Woodgett and his ilk are trying to defend "science" but are not modeling a good scientific aptitude themselves.
This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.