On 2013 Nov 20, Jamie Horder commented:
It would be wrong to say that reverse coded items are rarely not unconfusing!
This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.
On 2013 Nov 20, Jamie Horder commented:
It would be wrong to say that reverse coded items are rarely not unconfusing!
On 2013 Nov 17, James C Coyne commented:
Formal Correction: This article has been formally corrected to address the following errors.
As a result of an error by PLOS ONE, an incorrect version of the article was typeset. Below is a link to a version of the article based on the correct manuscript.
http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=71757
On 2013 Nov 17, James C Coyne commented:
Formal Correction: This article has been formally corrected to address the following errors.
As a result of an error by PLOS ONE, an incorrect version of the article was typeset. Below is a link to a version of the article based on the correct manuscript.
http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=71757
On 2013 Nov 20, Jamie Horder commented:
It would be wrong to say that reverse coded items are rarely not unconfusing!