2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2014 Mar 01, David Mage commented:

      The author is correct that infant asphyxia of overlaying by a co-sleeper has an equal risk for both males and females Williams FL, 2001. However, he is incorrect that the ratio of male to female infant deaths by SIDS is usually 2:1. When all SIDS studies are combined the male fraction goes to 0.61 corresponding to a male:female ratio of 3:2, not 2:1 Mage DT, 2004, Mage DT, 2014.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2014 Mar 01, David Mage commented:

      The author is correct that infant asphyxia of overlaying by a co-sleeper has an equal risk for both males and females Williams FL, 2001. However, he is incorrect that the ratio of male to female infant deaths by SIDS is usually 2:1. When all SIDS studies are combined the male fraction goes to 0.61 corresponding to a male:female ratio of 3:2, not 2:1 Mage DT, 2004, Mage DT, 2014.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.