2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2013 Nov 16, M Mangan commented:

      This editorial provides an interesting explanation for why this journal chose to publish an article that generated a negative result, which was an attempt to replicate previous work. It provides an interesting discussion of the philosophy of replicating work and of publishing replications, which not all journals will elect to do, apparently. The replication article they published this one: Dickinson B, 2013.

      The new article described the inability to replicate the claims from this prior article: Zhang L, 2012.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2013 Nov 16, M Mangan commented:

      This editorial provides an interesting explanation for why this journal chose to publish an article that generated a negative result, which was an attempt to replicate previous work. It provides an interesting discussion of the philosophy of replicating work and of publishing replications, which not all journals will elect to do, apparently. The replication article they published this one: Dickinson B, 2013.

      The new article described the inability to replicate the claims from this prior article: Zhang L, 2012.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.