2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2016 Oct 16, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva commented:

      There are possible concerns with images in this paper.

      Fig 1e and f appear to be the same section, just rotated and/or with contrast adjusted. In addition, key findings of this study, the “crystal formations”, appear to be inserted objects into the image, at least one of which appears to be a 4-copy carbon copy (purple circles). http://imgur.com/ZcHzSYq

      Fig 1g, 1h and 1i “crystal formations” appear to be cloned, in some cases with sizes adjusted. They have remarkably similar features, shape, etc. http://imgur.com/UY82sIQ

      Authors and editors and Springer management contacted on June 15, 2016. To date, no response by any party.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2016 Oct 16, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva commented:

      There are possible concerns with images in this paper.

      Fig 1e and f appear to be the same section, just rotated and/or with contrast adjusted. In addition, key findings of this study, the “crystal formations”, appear to be inserted objects into the image, at least one of which appears to be a 4-copy carbon copy (purple circles). http://imgur.com/ZcHzSYq

      Fig 1g, 1h and 1i “crystal formations” appear to be cloned, in some cases with sizes adjusted. They have remarkably similar features, shape, etc. http://imgur.com/UY82sIQ

      Authors and editors and Springer management contacted on June 15, 2016. To date, no response by any party.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.