On 2014 Nov 21, Irina M Conboy commented:
Thank you for the positive and constructive comment on our manuscript. We agree in general terms that it would be premature to start prescribing oxtocin to people who suffer from muscle wasting and many of your points suggested to be addressed before the clinical trials are actually being performed or are planned as near future work in our laboratory.
1) How does the short half-life of OT (3-5 minutes) impact the utility of it being a therapeutic agent for sarcopenia? Short half-life does not signify a lack of activity particularly for hormones with physiological short life; and in animal studies once a day single injection of oxytocin sufficed for the enhanced regeneration of old muscle after less than 2 weeks of administration.
2) Could systemic administration of OT suppress appetite and actually exacerbate muscle wasting in the elderly? There is a known problem with obesity in general and in the elderly; obesity exacerbates the lack of mobility (leading to decline in muscle health) and obesity also leads to and aggravates metabolic disorders, which in turn promote muscle wasting. Therefore, suppression of appetite by oxytocin might be actually therapeutic for obese individuals. For those who are frail or have poor appetite due to old age or disease, there should be of course, a caution in recommending oxytocin.
3) What would their dose be when expressed as a human equivalent dose, and how does this relate to what we already know about the maximum safe dose for OT? The therapeutic safe for humans doses of oxytocin will be determined experimentally and this is in our plans. The path to this is well developed and many commercial as well as UC Berkeley services are available. The current clinical use of oxytocin facilitates the development of its use for additional therapeutic applications.
Lastly, similar to many other basic science studies, the authors suggest that OT could impact ‘muscle strength and agility’, but have done no functional or behavioral measurements. As we, and others, have pointed out, the age-related loss of muscle strength is only partially explained by the reduction in muscle mass, as many other neural and muscular factors are involved in age-related muscle weakness (as well as motor function outcomes, such as agility). In fact, a number of papers indicate that an increase in muscle mass does not increase strength in both rodents and humans. Our ongoing work is promising in suggesting that animal strength and agility indeed rely (at least in part) on oxytocin and healthy muscle that regenerates well is obviously innervated/re-innervated better. With respect to experimentally induced increase in muscle mass, e.g. by decrease in tissue remodeling, such unbalanced non-physiological interventions would be predicted not to have sustainable functional improvement in tissue health. In contrast, restoring physiological levels of a hormone that is important for muscle tissue maintenance and declines with age is predicted to lead to successful restoration of both regeneration and function of skeletal muscle. This will be examined in the necessary pre-clinical work, which is in our plans. Of important note, in all single gene KO studies, the age and gender matched littermates provide the necessary controls; as such, premature sacropenia in oxytocin KO mice as compared to the wt littermates (established in our work) signifies that oxytocin is needed not only for muscle regeneration, but also for the maintenance of muscle mass and fiber size.
This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.