On 2015 Dec 11, Deborah Ritter commented:

It is ZNF444, not ZNF44. Throughout the article, they use ZNF444 and the referenced article uses ZNF444. I contacted to publisher to report the mistake and was told they cannot change it.

Dear Dr Ritter,

Thank you for your email.

We can no longer correct the article because it is already published in an issue.

Regards,

Production Editor On behalf of Wiley Manila

From: cs-author@wiley.com Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:33 AM To: Subject: URGENT --- correct ZNF44 in abstract to ZNF444 Your case 00636351 [ ref:00Dd0eeku.500d0f4DMy:ref ]

Dear Deb,

Histopathology - Vol 65, Iss 6, Dec 2014 "Myoepithelioma of bone with a novel FUS-POU5F1 fusion gene" DOI: 10.1111/his.12517

Thank you for your recent communication regarding a correction to the above article.

We understand your concern, hence, we have copied the journal's Production Editor into this email, as they are in the best position to assist you further. They will be contacting you shortly. Your patience in the meantime is much appreciated.

Arjane, we would greatly appreciate if you could please assist with the customer's inquiry regarding a typographical error as detailed in their email below. They are asking if this can possibly be corrected. Please respond to the customer directly at dritter@bcm.edu.

Kind regards,

Wiley Author Support

If you require further assistance with this matter or would like information on any of our other journals please visit Online Get Help to assist with many of your queries 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

--------------- Original Message --------------- From: Sent: 12/2/2015 8:40 AM To: cs-journals@wiley.com Subject: correct ZNF44 in abstract to ZNF444 {500d000000f4DMyAAM.003d000002imvxXAAQ}

Hi,

I recently found an article from Genes Chromosomes Cancer on myoepithelioma of bone, and I was interested in ZNF44 gene, which is mentioned in the abstract. However, throughout the rest of the article (and in the referenced article about fusion with EWSR1) the gene is ZNF444. It looks like there is a typo in the abstract for ZNF44 instead of ZNF444, and I just wanted to send a quick note about it to be corrected if possible.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066216

Thank you,

Deb

On 2015 Dec 11, Deborah Ritter commented:

It is ZNF444, not ZNF44. Throughout the article, they use ZNF444 and the referenced article uses ZNF444. I contacted to publisher to report the mistake and was told they cannot change it.

Dear Dr Ritter,

Thank you for your email.

We can no longer correct the article because it is already published in an issue.

Regards,

Production Editor On behalf of Wiley Manila

From: cs-author@wiley.com Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:33 AM To: Subject: URGENT --- correct ZNF44 in abstract to ZNF444 Your case 00636351 [ ref:00Dd0eeku.500d0f4DMy:ref ]

Dear Deb,

Histopathology - Vol 65, Iss 6, Dec 2014 "Myoepithelioma of bone with a novel FUS-POU5F1 fusion gene" DOI: 10.1111/his.12517

Thank you for your recent communication regarding a correction to the above article.

We understand your concern, hence, we have copied the journal's Production Editor into this email, as they are in the best position to assist you further. They will be contacting you shortly. Your patience in the meantime is much appreciated.

Arjane, we would greatly appreciate if you could please assist with the customer's inquiry regarding a typographical error as detailed in their email below. They are asking if this can possibly be corrected. Please respond to the customer directly at dritter@bcm.edu.

Kind regards,

Wiley Author Support

If you require further assistance with this matter or would like information on any of our other journals please visit Online Get Help to assist with many of your queries 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

--------------- Original Message --------------- From: Sent: 12/2/2015 8:40 AM To: cs-journals@wiley.com Subject: correct ZNF44 in abstract to ZNF444 {500d000000f4DMyAAM.003d000002imvxXAAQ}

Hi,

I recently found an article from Genes Chromosomes Cancer on myoepithelioma of bone, and I was interested in ZNF44 gene, which is mentioned in the abstract. However, throughout the rest of the article (and in the referenced article about fusion with EWSR1) the gene is ZNF444. It looks like there is a typo in the abstract for ZNF44 instead of ZNF444, and I just wanted to send a quick note about it to be corrected if possible.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066216

Thank you,

Deb