On 2017 Nov 27, Eyal Shahar commented:

"The consistency thingamajig is a bundle of biases rolled into one. First, it is the assumption that effect‐modification is absent (which is strange by itself because effect modification plays a bizarre role in determinism.) Second, the claim that exposure needs to be “defined” either leads to thought bias or illustrates misunderstanding of information bias."

The consistency rule http://www.u.arizona.edu/~shahar/commentaries.html

On 2017 Nov 27, Eyal Shahar commented:

"The consistency thingamajig is a bundle of biases rolled into one. First, it is the assumption that effect‐modification is absent (which is strange by itself because effect modification plays a bizarre role in determinism.) Second, the claim that exposure needs to be “defined” either leads to thought bias or illustrates misunderstanding of information bias."

The consistency rule http://www.u.arizona.edu/~shahar/commentaries.html