4 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2016 Aug 30, Olga Krizanova commented:

      We are aware that there are some papers showing ineffectivity of Xestospongin C on IP3 receptors. Nevertheless, Xest is a widely accepted inhibitor of IP3 receptors (IP3R), as documented by majority IP3R papers and also by companies selling this product (e.g. Sigma-Aldrich, Cayman Chemical, Abcam, etc.). Since Xest also inhibits voltage-dependent Ca2+ and K+ currents at concentrations similar to those which inhibit the IP3R, it can be regarded as a selective blocker of the IP3R in permeabilized cells. Cell type used in experiments might be of a special importance. In our paper we observed the effect of Xest on IP3R1 on four different cell lines -A2780, SKOV3, Bowes and MDA-MB-231. Moreover, we verified results observed by Xest by another IP3R blocker -2-APB and also by IP3R1 silencing. All these results imply that Xest acts as IP3R inhibitor. Recently, paper with more specific Xestospongin B was published, but unfortunately, this compound is not yet commercially available.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2016 Aug 22, Darren Boehning commented:

      Xestospongin C (Xest) does not inhibit IP3R channels. See PMID: 24628114 PMCID: PMC4080982 DOI: 10.1111/bph.12685 There are other well-documented examples in the literature.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2016 Aug 22, Darren Boehning commented:

      Xestospongin C (Xest) does not inhibit IP3R channels. See PMID: 24628114 PMCID: PMC4080982 DOI: 10.1111/bph.12685 There are other well-documented examples in the literature.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2016 Aug 30, Olga Krizanova commented:

      We are aware that there are some papers showing ineffectivity of Xestospongin C on IP3 receptors. Nevertheless, Xest is a widely accepted inhibitor of IP3 receptors (IP3R), as documented by majority IP3R papers and also by companies selling this product (e.g. Sigma-Aldrich, Cayman Chemical, Abcam, etc.). Since Xest also inhibits voltage-dependent Ca2+ and K+ currents at concentrations similar to those which inhibit the IP3R, it can be regarded as a selective blocker of the IP3R in permeabilized cells. Cell type used in experiments might be of a special importance. In our paper we observed the effect of Xest on IP3R1 on four different cell lines -A2780, SKOV3, Bowes and MDA-MB-231. Moreover, we verified results observed by Xest by another IP3R blocker -2-APB and also by IP3R1 silencing. All these results imply that Xest acts as IP3R inhibitor. Recently, paper with more specific Xestospongin B was published, but unfortunately, this compound is not yet commercially available.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.