2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2016 Sep 04, Egon Willighagen commented:

      This paper raises a number of interesting points about contemporary research. The choice of word "selfies" is a bit misleading, IMHO, particularly because the article also discusses the internet.

      The problem of selfies is partly because the liberal ideas that research is a free market where researchers have to sell their research and compete for funding. Indeed, I was trained to do so by the generation of researchers above me, and I learned what role conferences (talks, posters), publication lists (amount, where, etc) have in this. Using the Internet is just an extension of this, and nothing special; this idea of selfies was introduced before the internet, not after.

      Unfortunately, the Internet is used more for these selfies (publication lists, CVs, announcements) than for actual research: exchange of research data is still very limited. That is indeed a shame and must change. But I guess it can only really change after the current way research is funded has changed.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2016 Sep 04, Egon Willighagen commented:

      This paper raises a number of interesting points about contemporary research. The choice of word "selfies" is a bit misleading, IMHO, particularly because the article also discusses the internet.

      The problem of selfies is partly because the liberal ideas that research is a free market where researchers have to sell their research and compete for funding. Indeed, I was trained to do so by the generation of researchers above me, and I learned what role conferences (talks, posters), publication lists (amount, where, etc) have in this. Using the Internet is just an extension of this, and nothing special; this idea of selfies was introduced before the internet, not after.

      Unfortunately, the Internet is used more for these selfies (publication lists, CVs, announcements) than for actual research: exchange of research data is still very limited. That is indeed a shame and must change. But I guess it can only really change after the current way research is funded has changed.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.