4 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2017 Jan 31, Sin Hang Lee commented:

      Assuming you have read the reference under the Comment.

      Perhaps, you or someone would like to respond to the comment on behalf of Dr. Mark Schiffman and colleagues on the PubMed Commons below the abstract of following article. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905473

      I would like to initiate a forum of open discussion, not one-sided proclamations.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2017 Jan 31, Stuart RAY commented:

      The comment above does not provide any evidence for the dissent stated. What is "biased and dangerous" about the HPV vaccination recommendation?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    3. On 2017 Jan 24, Sin Hang Lee commented:

      The Editorial “Trump’s vaccine-commission idea is biased and dangerous” in Nature 2017 Jan 17;541(7637):259 is debatable. At least one article published by the Nature Publishing Group, in Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2016;2:16086 [1], promoting mass human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of girls 9-13 years of age and teenage boys at the cost of >$50 million for every 100,000 adolescents in the name of cervical cancer prevention is equally biased and dangerous. Medical journal censorship of dissenting data and opinions has suppressed the facts that the benefits of mass HPV vaccination are uncertain and the risks are substantial at great cost to society.

      References:

      1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905473

      Sin Hang Lee shlee01@snet.net Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory Milford,CT


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2017 Jan 24, Sin Hang Lee commented:

      The Editorial “Trump’s vaccine-commission idea is biased and dangerous” in Nature 2017 Jan 17;541(7637):259 is debatable. At least one article published by the Nature Publishing Group, in Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2016;2:16086 [1], promoting mass human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of girls 9-13 years of age and teenage boys at the cost of >$50 million for every 100,000 adolescents in the name of cervical cancer prevention is equally biased and dangerous. Medical journal censorship of dissenting data and opinions has suppressed the facts that the benefits of mass HPV vaccination are uncertain and the risks are substantial at great cost to society.

      References:

      1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905473

      Sin Hang Lee shlee01@snet.net Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory Milford,CT


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.