2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2016 Oct 18, Morten Oksvold commented:

      This review is citing Bezwoda WR et al., J Clinical Oncology, 1995, a study which was retracted in 2001 due to fraud. The retracted JCO article represented one of the worst cases of research fraud ever The review article is highlighting the fraudulent research data, and it is therefore surprising that the article is still not retracted.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2016 Oct 18, Morten Oksvold commented:

      This review is citing Bezwoda WR et al., J Clinical Oncology, 1995, a study which was retracted in 2001 due to fraud. The retracted JCO article represented one of the worst cases of research fraud ever The review article is highlighting the fraudulent research data, and it is therefore surprising that the article is still not retracted.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.