5 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. is perhaps best viewed as an internecine struggle over the strategies of the Blue Tribe in an era of political crisis and despair. Everyone has skin in the game, and the stakes are high.

      That was a lot of verbiage for little gain by the reader. This is really a techno-cultural intelligencia fight by the "rationalists" bubble. Who really cares about this and what truly is the impact? It's similar to the Charlie Kirk phenomena - a seemingly large internet bubble (hmmm....2M world-wide followers - mostly in the US out of 330M people). Young and old of everyone I asked - no one had heard of him before his death. Maybe that's just my bubble - but using the "rationalists" approach - I think the data would play out - these bubbles are just not that big - they only feel that way when you're online.

      Topics learned today - Grey Tribe (ugh), media vs hippies still exists

    2. noted that S.S.C. was a “hugely influential voice, not only with the tight-knit community in the comments, but with some very influential figures in Silicon Valley and beyond.”

      Which isn't as large as promoted by it's pundits

    3. that he planned to write a “mostly positive” story; although there often seems to be some confusion about this matter in Silicon Valley, journalism and public relations are distinct enterprises. Finally, the business model of the Times has little to do with chasing “clicks,” per se, and, even if it did, no self-respecting journalist would conclude that the pursuit of clicks was best served by the de-anonymization of a “random blogger.”

      Either way - it is just speculation overall. Nothing like an internet bubble fighting with corporate news.