8 Matching Annotations
- Sep 2015
-
mcmorgan.org mcmorgan.org
-
Chorus stems from chora, and chora [khôra] is a potent term in my field of rhetoric, meaning, variously, the discovery of ideas, the space outside the walls of the city where ideas are born, or as a place of “emerging possibility”.
'Khora' another new word - one that @googleguacamole would like ;)
-
with three or four or howevermany versions of a document.
Okay. Here I can only work with one version of the document. A difference from FW
-
“only one valid set of relationships, inscribed by the author.”
-
keeping links within the document but letting every person have as many copies of that document as they like, with whatever links they want on each.
So like I do here in hypothesis? I have a copy of the page and can add opposing views, cat pics or whatever...why use fedwiki specifically though?
-
[L]inks as imagined by the heirs of Bush — Engelbart, Nelson, Van Dam — formed a layer of annotation on documents that were by and large a separate entity.
-
But it does place links on an independent layer
-
Paratexts.
-
For all the breadth the web and hypertext promises, it is still limited by single authors getting their stuff out there as their single perspective
because as the author I chose what/where to embed? I had not thought about the idea of finding links the 'author may not want you to find'. This would be possible if independent layer - ha, neat.
-