325 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2016
    1. It was engaging as a parent and spoke honestly about the nature of a parents concerns and worries.  The interview lead me to the blog and I got even more insight from it.

      It's key that the interview not only got you thinking but it got you doing.

    2. This interview with Bunmi helped me realize that if I don’t make it to all of those “magical” places, my children will not suffer and struggle as an adult because of it!

      Childhood doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be happy and healthy

    3. video games are overtaking some of those “get out in the yard and come up with something to do” moments.

      It's tough to combat the siren spell of digital instant gratification

    1. I ran into this short video which caught my attention because of the unique way it is told.

      This is a great video! I like the methods he used to tell the story.

    1. Use Hypothesis and add your second Daily Create as a public annotation to this blog post

      All of a sudden I'm hungry for my Second Daily Create!

      CmFlLBeUkAA8PTP<script async="" src="//&lt;a href=" http:="" embedr.flickr.com="" assets="" client-code.js"="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

    1. Chaos Manufacture - Unnecessarily creating or maintaining an environment of risk, destruction, confusion or mess.

      or have better things to do than tidy up

    2. Anger - People who suffer from personality disorders often feel a sense of unresolved anger and a heightened or exaggerated perception that they have been wronged, invalidated, neglected or abused.

      or maybe they're reading additional social cues that others are missing

    3. Most people will experience or exhibit a few of the above criteria from time to time. This does not make a person STPD.

      This is a contradiction with the whole diagnosis.

    4. bodily illusions.

      A bodily illusion is often tactile, like for example having the feeling that you are lacking an arm, or feeling like you don't really have a body, or feeling that you do not really control a certain part of your body, or that your body is not really yours, etc.

    5. Ideas of reference (excluding delusions of reference).

      Ideas of reference and delusions of reference describe the phenomenon of an individual's experiencing innocuous events or mere coincidences and believing they have strong personal significance. It is "the notion that everything one perceives in the world relates to one's own destiny."

    1. DIY came from the UK and counterculture is more US based and opposes social and cultural norms.

      Which is interesting because in some cultural ways it has become a part of the mainstream

    2. Overall I am still a bit confused about this week’s reading and fully grasping the DIY culture but I will continue to look for answers and maybe reading the other’s reflections will help me grasp this concept.

      Sounds like a great in-progress DIY project

    3. With DIY identity is a large piece in that you create and portray who you want to be and what you stand for

      DIY Identity is an interesting concept. You'd think that personal identity is always DIY, but it isn't is it?

    4. how it started as a home improvement term for people who didn’t want to pay high dollar to have something done around the house.

      I don't think it was all about the money. I think there's a large element of wanting to learn/demonstrate skills and have some pride in the accomplishment

    1. I think it would have been more engaging and easier to focus if she talked a little bit slower.

      It would also have helped the discussion feel a little more reasoned out

    2. She gave a voice to her view as well as sharing her own previous confusion about the terms

      She also used a personal example from her own history which helped others relate to the dilemma

    3. real life examples of how the different sides reacted to animal treatment and what it really means to be on the side of rights or welfare.

      She also did a good job of providing examples that clearly displayed the distinction

    1. younger digital story tellers to help flesh out my own thoughts regarding the use of digital story telling in the classroom.

      How would you use digital storytelling with your students?

    2. While it is short, the story is told with an effective economy.

      But is it too economical? I wanted to know more about what brought about her change of heart

    3. While some would say that this topic was a bit juvenile, I could easily see my middle school students identifying with it.

      I know a lot of adults who are scared of kids and who are afraid to even take the smallest risks

    1. I know that I can continue to work hard to design lessons that meet curriculum demands while being as hands-on and student driven as possible.

      It's just a matter of finding or designing a project for you students that will also meet the goals of the data/testing needs

    2. students had positive feelings toward the program and found the lessons fun and engaging.

      And they can see how they can use the knowledge that they are gaining

    3. With the current demands of data, rigor, and standardized testing, it’s hard to find time, or approval for PBL.

      Which is disappointing because PBL supports the use of the knowledge over "academic bulimia" which is more data and testing driven

    4. can help to activate their background knowledge and help to make learning more meaningful, and hopefully more interesting.

      What specific background knowledge are you trying to activate or does that vary based on the content or student?

    1. Eccentricity is not and should not be a privilege; it is a trait common to all humans, albeit in different levels and forms.

      So we should have different definitions of normal?

    2. Do stereotypical expectations about art and artists influence both the public’s judgment and the artists’ behavior?

      And what if the individual is not an artist or a scientist?

    3. One’s work may convey a message which is different and odd, but as soon as one behaves differently, it is perceived as unnecessary and strange.

      You can be different, but only as different as others are comfortable with

    4. the way we perceive art is not only influenced by the quality of art itself, but also the perceived degree of the artist’s eccentricity

      and the quality of the art varies based on the perceived eccentricity of the artist

    5. the “crowd” expects creative individuals to behave unusually, their once unconventional behavior is now a part of a stereotype.

      or part of the expected convention

    6. “unafraid of and uninfluenced by the opinions and vagaries of the crowd.”

      I think they aren't unaffected, just more determined to exist as their authentic selves

    7. It is a delightfully simple and effective definition that has been used in a figurative sense only for the last three hundred years.

      A simple definition something so complicated

    8. people indeed seem to value artwork higher, and to enjoy it more, if the artist in question displays unconventional and eccentric behavior.

      Because it is expected or because it makes the artist appear more creative?

    9. Or is it that the society perpetuates the stereotype, so Dali’s casual stroll with an anteater is a self-fulfilling prophecy?

      as is all eccentric behavior?

    1. Square pegs (and octagonal pegs with conical appendages) no longer have to work so hard at fitting in.

      In some parts of society, sure. Not all forms of eccentricity are "accepted" though

    2. The ascendancy of innovative technology as a key factor in economic growth has elevated creativity from merely a positive trait to a highly sought-after commodity in the global market

      Individuals who can ingest and connect multiple stimuli can help devise new strategies or interpretations on data

    3. “I don’t feel like a square peg trying to fit into a round hole. I feel like an octagonal peg with conical appendages.”

      Because who wants to be a square peg when there are much more interesting shapes out there

    4. This vulnerability may allow the highly creative person access to ideas and thoughts that are inaccessible to those of us with less porous mental filters.

      But that vulnerability can move one closer to the "abnormal" behavior line

    5. Work from our lab indicates that other cognitive factors, such as high IQ and high working-memory capacity, enable some people to process and mentally manipulate extra information without being overwhelmed by it.

      A good point. You have to have the bandwidth to process the extra stimuli

    6. These findings support the theory that cognitive disinhibition may be affected by genetic variations and that it may be one factor that predisposes an individual to both creative thought and eccentricity.

      eccentricity is inherited

    7. Several studies have linked gene variations that are associated with the neurotransmitter dopamine to both creativity and eccentricity

      More signals = more connections

    8. that alpha activity focuses attention inward, whereas the gamma burst coincides with the arrival of the solution into conscious awareness.

      so does higher alpha activity increase the opportunity for the gamma burst?

    9. his interpretation explains the tendency of creative people to focus on their inner lives,

      I don't understand why this is such a bad thing or a sign of a disorder

    10. We think that the reduction in cognitive inhibition allows more material into conscious awareness that can then be reprocessed and recombined in novel and original ways, resulting in creative ideas.

      Sort of a mental multitasking and recombination process. I've found it very helpful.

    11. When conscious awareness is overpopulated with unusual and unfiltered stimuli, it is difficult not to focus attention on that inner universe.

      Or the brain turns it into background noise - comforting and relaxing

    12. The ability to use cognitive disinhibition in a creative way depends on the presence of additional cognitive abilities associated with a high level of functioning.)

      both creative think and cognitive processes are required

    13. Cognitive disinhibition is also likely at the heart of what we think of as the aha! experience. During moments of insight, cognitive filters relax momentarily and allow ideas that are on the brain’s back burners to leap forward into conscious awareness, in the same manner that bizarre thoughts surface in the mind of the psychotic individual.

      So eccentrics are more open to putting information together and make connections.

    14. Reduced LI appears to increase the amount of unfiltered stimuli reaching our conscious awareness and is associated with offbeat thoughts

      why does this sound as if the author thinks of this as defective? Maybe "normal" people are missing the stimuli altogether

    15. Cognitive disinhibition is the failure to ignore information that is irrelevant to current goals or to survival.

      But who defines that it is irrelevant? Maybe eccentric people don't see that some information is irrelevant

    16. certain cognitive mechanisms that may underlie eccentricity could also promote creative thinking, however

      Essentially, eccentric people think differently or have different ways of processing stimuli

    17. not only do highly creative people display more of the traits associated with schizotypy but that the combination of creativity and schizotypy tends to run in families, again pointing toward a genetic component.

      So this is shared behavior in a family but not necessarily abnormal to the family

    18. The Kinney group also made a new discovery: some of their control subjects who did not have a family history of schizophrenia met the profile for schizotypal personality—and they too scored higher for creativity than other control subjects.

      so maybe there isn't an exact relationship...

    19. chizotypal individuals may inherit the unconventional modes of thinking and perceiving associated with schizophrenia without inheriting the disease itself.

      But what about individuals without a family history?

    20. They are often very high functioning, talented and intelligent.

      Then why create a diagnosis for it? Doesn't the existence of a diagnosis imply the implication of mental illness?

    21. The schizotypal diagnosis grew out of large epidemiological studies in which researchers noticed that the relatives of indi­viduals diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to exhibit odd behaviors and beliefs than relatives of those not afflicted with schizophrenia

      How close or far is the relationship to find a correlation?

    22. social anhedonia (a preference for solitary activities—Emily Dickinson, Nikola Tesla and Isaac Newton, for example, favored work over socializing),

      why is this problematic if the individual is happy?

    23. To measure creativity, researchers may look at an individual’s record of creative achievements, his or her involvement in creative activities or ability to think creatively (for example, to come up with new uses for ordinary household items).

      But what constitutes an achievement or involvement? Who quantifies this? What is the measure? How would you prevent bias on the part of the measurer?

    24. attributed this behavior to the same hereditary “degeneration” that marked violent criminals.

      Just as eccentrics today are still seen as abnormal or potentially mentally ill

    25. increased acceptance of the latter.

      within certain industries and specific companied maybe. Not all corporate cultures are accepting of behaviors that are different

    26. These individuals often see themselves as different and unable to fit in.

      Because they know they don't fit the world's definition of "normal" and the push to fit into a mold causes stress

    1. openly licensed textbook,

      another advantage of open licenses and online textbooks is that the information can be kept current and relevant. you still here stories about schools using textbooks from the 1970s. The school district here in Las Vegas has a warehouse full of textbooks that have never been used and are now out of date

    2. Education is, first and foremost, an enterprise of sharing. In fact, sharing is the sole means by which education is effected. If an instructor is not sharing what he or she knows with students, there is no education happening.

      where would it end if we started copyrighting everything in education? how can you copyright principles or concepts?

    3. Since the invention of the Internet, copyright law has been “strengthened” to further restrict the Internet’s copying and sharing capabilities.

      but some of these strengthened laws have seen a massive backlash and actually pushed users to share more

    4. creativity and control.

      Where is the encouragement for individuals, especially students, to be creative or innovative if an outside entity is going to claim ownership without sharing?

    5. the ownership of content and the ownership of data.

      The public sector appears to be coming to this debate a little late. What surprises me is that it doesn't seem like this school district looked at common practices before developing such a sweeping policy

    6. The district proposal would have prevented its teachers from selling their materials online.

      Even though much of these materials are produced outside of work to supplement the inadequate district-provided curriculum

    7. are properties of the Board of Education even if created on the employee’s or student’s time and with use of their materials.”

      Interesting way of trying to claim intellectual rights over something. Funny, it doesn't work that way in business...