She has the right to hypersexualize herself, but Miley shouldn’t exploit others in the process.
she sexualizes other women, in particular black women in the process of sexualizing her own body (she can do whatever she wants with hers)
She has the right to hypersexualize herself, but Miley shouldn’t exploit others in the process.
she sexualizes other women, in particular black women in the process of sexualizing her own body (she can do whatever she wants with hers)
Cyrus is hardly alone in borrowing from black artists, and cultural appropriation has become the new norm
"stealing" from others culture is not new
where black artists accounted for many of the most successful songs and would bring white artists in on guest vocals to appeal to a broader audience.
is it possible everyone does this?
“empowering other cultures.” It’s a glorified advertising campaign
using other culture for self, similar how she sexualizes others bodies for personal gain
Hip hop is becoming increasingly dominated by white folks,
not sure about this
Free cultures are cultures that leave a great deal open for others to build upon; unfree, or permission, cultures leave much less. Ours was a free culture. It is becoming much less so.
main point of article is that cultures have similarities. also to improve you need to look at ideas from past and improve upon them
Early cartoons are filled with knockoffs—slight variations on winning themes; retellings of ancient stories. The key to success was the brilliance of the differences.
everything through history uses past ideas
his spark of creativity, was built upon the work of others.
used other ideas and made them next level
And it was something new!”
might not have been great but it was something new and had potential as an idea
Code is "making" because we've figured out how to package it up into discrete units and sell it, and because it is widely perceived to be done by men.
men do it so they found a loophole to consider coding making
Well, bullshit. I make stuff.” I understand this response, but I’m not going to ask people—including myself—to deform what they do so they can call themselves a "maker."
people say they make, even if they do not, to seem like what they do is more important
Walk through a museum. Look around a city. Almost all the artifacts that we value as a society were made by or at the order of men. But behind every one is an invisible infrastructure of labor—primarily caregiving, in its various aspects—that is mostly performed by women.
making was traditionally a mans job so it is viewed as the more important thing. caregiving was traditionally a womens job so it is viewed as less important.
It’s not, of course, that there’s anything wrong with making (although it’s not all that clear that the world needs more stuff). The problem is the idea that the alternative to making is usually not doing nothing
just because you do not make does not devalue you
I’m uncomfortable with any culture that encourages you take on an entire identity, rather than to express a facet of your own identity ("maker," rather than "someone who makes things").
we are more than what we do for a living
When tech culture only celebrates creation, it risks ignoring those who teach, criticize, and take care of others.
Summary of the article