17 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2023
    1. But he’s not completely sold on it; he wonders whether communities will be trained to use the technology and keep the printer to continue to build houses after the companies have moved on. This, he said, will determine "whether they’re just providing housing to people or whether they’re also providing skills or training.”

      This is the negative view of 3-d printing and whether companies are doing this to make themselves look good. That is why I think the article did a better job of understanding how bad homelessness is. This article feels like they are just throwing out ideas that may work, but might not be the best solution.

    2. The entire home is printed seamlessly and is sustainable, produces nearly zero waste, and is resilient.”

      This article needs to go into more in-depth on how the lightweight aluminum is sustainable. If it can keep people safe and show that people can actually live in these houses. Then, 3-d printing can be solution. But, where do you get the machines capable to make these houses? Are companies actually to take the initiative to commit to help the homeless people?

    3. Built out of lightweight aluminum, it includes a backup generator.

      I am wondering is lightweight aluminum sustainable enough to withstand some natural disasters? Also, the backup generator is probably for keeping insulation in the house? I have so many questions on this article since it does not go into much detail.

    4. With conventional building techniques, erecting a simple home can take months and cost tens of thousands of dollars. But New Story co-founder Matthew Marshall told NBC News MACH in an email that with help from a giant 3D printer called “The Vulcan,” a basic three-room, one-story concrete home can be built in a single day — and for a cost of only $4,000.

      More specifications on how much it costs. That sounds very reasonable, but the other article said that it costed $2,200. So, having tiny houses might be better?

    5. Three-dimensional printing has changed the way we make everything from dental appliances to jet engines, and soon it could be used to make low-cost houses for some of the world’s 150 million homeless people.

      I do not know much about 3-d printing, but does it take a lot of material to just make one object? Also, the fact that it would take a long time to make a house using 3-d printing might be not a good idea?

    1. Showers and shared kitchen facilities are in a warm, permanent building, rather than the canvas tents used sixty miles away in Seattle. Every tiny house has a porch and a bathroom. As an equal proportion of the development’s total price tag, each house costs $88,000; on an individual basis they are $19,000 per unit.

      Homeless people are actually getting their basic necessities covered and it helps with better hygiene that other people living in those cabins and camps desperately needed.

    2. They will cost $60,000 per unit rather than $3,300, as at Heben’s inaugural project, yet they will still only be a third of the price of conventional affordable housing in Eugene.These sorts of comparatively comfortable tiny homes already exist at Quixote village in Olympia, the state capital of Washington. Some view it as the gold-standard for tiny house communities. Ten of the original 30 residents who moved in three years ago have stayed, and some have signaled they want to remain for good. Quixote “is almost the pinnacle of their aspirations”, said Alan, 66, a resident for two years.

      So, this place has achieved something other places are trying to and it seems that homeless people are actually having some comfort with these housings.

    3. But she conceded there was a shortage of places where people could move. Seattle’s lack of affordable housing has contributed to what Lee calls the worst homelessness crisis of her 25-year career.

      I guess it was false hope that she did help at least 161 people, but she forgot about the housing crisis where people do not want to buy any houses since they prices are jacked up.

    4. The city insists they are only a stopgap solution, and the ultimate goal is to move tiny-house residents into permanent homes. Lee said she has achieved this with 161 people.

      Well, it is interesting how this is working and helping towards people actually affording permanent housing.

    5. Tiny houses costing a mere $2,200 would be exempt from regulations governing residential buildings.

      I am wondering if getting all the materials for tiny houses is that total amount of $2,200 according to this news article?

    6. nonprofit that supports the camp raised enough money to connect the huts to electricity, bringing heat and light. They felt the money would be better spent on constructing more tiny houses, because homeless people inquire about vacancies on a daily basis.

      It is really hard to figure out how to put the money to go use. This sentence does not specify how much that nonprofit earned, but if it is enough to get electricity then splitting the funds might be better rather than spending on electricity?

    7. She advised against funding tiny house encampments, arguing the money would be better spent constructing permanent affordable housing. The city is going ahead with them regardless.

      A great idea, but like I said, it would take months to even construct homes and there is not even enough space to construct them. Also, the cost of constructing them is going to take a lot. Allocating funds to do this project will be hard.

    8. the creation of shantytowns.

      Again, it feels like a reference to the Great Depression and to a Hooverville. You know it is bad when it feels like homelessness is getting worse and could be much worse than what happened during the Great Depression?

    9. Some of America’s most liberal cities have in recent years shifted from banning and clearing unauthorized homeless settlements, based in part on the argument they were unfit for habitation, to sanctioning and even funding camps that skirt building regulations thanks to loopholes or special dispensation.

      A good move for liberal cities to attempt to give them some funds into actually making habitable places for the homeless to live. Building new houses for them would take months to construct and doing this can decrease a bit of the homeless population.

    10. Wooden cabins euphemistically referred to as tiny houses are increasingly viewed as a quick and cheap solution to homelessness and, with minimal public debate, they are mushrooming across the country.

      This thing about how wooden cabins popping up almost feels like the Great Depression where President Hoover had those houses named Hoovervilles named after him.

    11. Until recently the cabins lacked heating or electricity, and the children who live there – currently 11 of its 67 inhabitants – had to use flashlights to read their schoolbooks

      This is terrible for children. Living in a cabin without any electricity or heating as a child is not a great way to live because they barely have any survival skills to even do anything. What even happens to them when winter comes? They'll suffer from hyperthermia.

    12. both cities that have resisted efforts for city-approved communities of tiny houses, activists have been distributing homemade varieties in unsanctioned acts of guerilla philanthropy.

      The government is not doing anything to help. Only the community can do something to contribute, and at least it suffices for those homeless. It says that those activists helping are considered "unsanctioned acts". I believe that this is one of the best ways to help if they government just turns a blind eye.