38 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. . The scarring of the past need not continue in the future — a future which will be determined not just by administrators but by brave students who speak out and start making a difference.
      • the conclusion shifts from the authors personal experiences to the possibility of changing the system for future students
    2. The following year, things did end up changing at CSUSB, due in part to the implementation of a new initiative, directed self-placement (DSP), which gave students the opportunity to choose their own English placement.

      ! Their research did more than earn a grade; it allowed them to challenge an institution

    3. challenge administrators and faculty to label students accurately: as writers.
      • One of the authors’ biggest arguments: writers are always developing, so one negative label should not define them.
    4. So we began writing, hoping to someday publish our work. That was our rebellion against the unfair label.

      Demonstrates the idea that writing can be used to take action and create change

    5. And then we proposed and presented a session at the 2013 Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC), where the audience response encouraged us to reach farther with our ideas.

      ! Their accomplishments directly challenge the assumptions that they were incapable writers

    6. However, all the work we read was written by professors and other scholars, not by students who have actually lived with the stigma of being labeled remedial
      • The authors want students themselves to have a voice in the discussion about remediation
    7. the remedial label affected my identity formation in that the university’s doubt whether I was a “real” college student weakened my own sense of identity and belonging as a college student

      ! This makes negative labeling especially important because first-year students are still developing their sense of who they are.

    8. Reading Brandt helped us reflect on our sponsors.
      • Connects the university to Brandt: universities and teachers can act as literacy sponsors because they influence how students develop as writers
    9. Student portraits when we do get them are too often profiles of failure rather than of people with dynamic mental lives.

      The outside research supports the students’ argument that institutions often create incomplete pictures of struggling students.

    10. I learned that EPT scores like mine result in students being unjustly labeled and prejudged prior to stepping foot inside a classroom of the university

      *Supports the argument that one test result can create assumptions before professors see what a student can actually do

    11. we wanted to do a paper on the topic of “remediation” for our term paper. I thought if I was going to prove that I wasn’t a remedial student, I would need to interview as many students, professors, and administrators that were directly associated with the label as I could, so I did just that

      Their argument becomes stronger because they move beyond personal experience and investigate the system itself

    12. we decided that we needed to look beyond our own experiences to the work of those we were now describing as “other scholars.”
      • Their personal confusion becomes the reason for concluding research
    13. why over half of Cal State students were being labeled remedial, why the majority of the students who are defined as remedial are minorities

      ? This raises an issue about whether the placement system affects certain groups disproportionately

    14. this class would be no different from the English class that any incoming college students take, except that our class was stretched over a longer span.

      ! Needing additional time does not mean someone is incapable of college-level work

    15. I no longer felt that my essay was controlling me. I knew what I wanted to say, and I knew how to translate it into my paper; I controlled what I wrote.

      *The challenging work actually increased her confidence instead of proving that she was academically deficient

    16. The term remedial implies that we are not at the college level, but in my “remedial” class all we ever did from the first day was college-level work.

      ? If the work is college level, what actually makes the students “remedial”

    17. I was shocked when our professor did not hand out a grammar book and start teaching us how to construct sentences or how to properly use a comma. Instead she began by having us read scholarly journals and think critically about them.
      • their classroom experience does not match the university’s idea of what remedial students are capable of doing
    18. She never treated us like remedial students. She believed in us and knew from the beginning that we had a lot of potential
      • The professor’s expectations helped the students see themselves differently
    19. I was shocked when I started reading the syllabus. I thought it would have a lot of grammar lessons or basic instructions on how to do an essay, but it didn’t. It had a lot of reading passages and articles by scholars like Michel Foucault, Peter Elbow, James Paul Gee, and many more.

      ! She expected easy remedial work, but the course immediately challenged that stereotype

    20. we all had plenty of people to tell us that we were remedial and exactly what that meant: not-good, fake, damaged, unlikely to succeed. We were embarrassed; we felt marginal, inferior, and alienated.

      *This summarizes the main impact that the language of remediation had on the students

    21. He said, “When you place in remedial it means that you have to take extra English classes in order to be considered a ‘real college student.’” That shocked me because I had worked so hard to get into a university, only to find out that I was not a “real college student” after all.
      • Calling someone not a “real” student creates an unnecessary division between students.
    22. It’s been three years since I was labeled, and I’ve accomplished so much during that time. However, despite my accomplishments, the label still stings as much as it did at first.

      ! This shows that a label can continue affecting someone long after the label was given

    23. Based on our EPT scores, we five FYW students were categorized as remedial.

      *A test score determined how the university viewed these students before considering their actual experiences or abilities as writers.

    24. 50–80% of first-year students enrolled on its twenty-three campuses as remedial writers, although sometimes using the label “not yet proficient.” English departments have resisted these categories in various ways, and now most of them have adopted local enactments of what Arizona State University calls “stretch” programs (Glau) in which students do substantive text work that is not, and is not named, remedial.

      ! That percentage is surprisingly high. It shows how many students can receive a “remedial” label even when universities no longer offer remedial English.

    25. My literacy is the culmination of my singular life experiences, and my chinks are the acquired, distinctive scars that allow the light from within to shine through.

      ! In the end, she accepts the parts of her language and identity that she once tried to hide

    26. I compromised my literacy by letting my Chinese go out of practice and evaporate. I can only manage forced, short exchanges in a language I should naturally, competently speak. I have disappointed expectant relatives and visitors by failing to confidently address them in our once shared dialogue. My parents and grandparents are disheartened by my negligent, vaporous Mandarin.
      • shows consequences of losing part of her bilingual literacy
    27. When I’d stopped using bilingual options to convey exclusive nuances with my mother, a monumental portion of my literacy became void

      ! Her shift toward English creates distance between her and her mother

    28. Though that was meant to be a pivotal moment in my life where my literacy first and finally garnered approval and notice from someone with an educative purview, it felt undeserved

      ? Why does she care so much about approval from others, that it affects how she sees herself as a writer

    29. The lack of ingenuity was obvious, and excused, by my command of sentence structure, paragraphing, and overall grammar

      ! She follows the rules of writing but she feels like her personal voice is disappearing

    30. espite its myriad of hybridizations, my most spoken words retained one message: “ I love you,” or “ mama!”
      • Example of different languages mixing while still communicating the same emotions
    31. ’ve had the distinct impression throughout my life that my literacy was held to a separate, lower standard

      ? Why would people judge her literacy before considering her actual abilities