8 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2020
    1. He is a man speaking to men: a man, it is true, endued with more lively sensibility, more enthusiasm and tenderness, who has a greater  knowledge of human nature, and a more comprehensive soul, than are supposed to be common among mankind; a man pleased with his own passions and volitions,  and who rejoices more than other men in the spirit of life that is in him; delighting to contemplate similar volitions and passions as manifested in the goings-on of the  Universe, and habitually impelled to create them where he does not find them. To these qualities he has added a disposition to be affected more than other men by  absent things as if they were present; an ability of conjuring up in himself passions, which are indeed far from being the same as those produced by real events, yet  (especially in those parts of the general sympathy which are pleasing and delightful) do more nearly resemble the passions produced by real events, than any thing  which, from the motions of their own minds merely, other men are accustomed to feel in themselves; whence, and from practice, he has acquired a greater readiness  and power in expressing what he thinks and feels, and especially those thoughts and feelings which, by his own choice, or from the structure of his own mind, arise in  him without immediate external excitement.

      Are poets better than regular men? We see here that Poets have a better knowledge of nature and a more comprehensive soul. Can anyone become a poet, or are they born poets and can only be born poets?

    2. I have also informed my Reader what this purpose will be found principally to be: namely to illustrate the manner  in which our feelings and ideas are associated in a state of excitement. But, speaking in language somewhat more appropriate, it is to follow the fluxes and refluxes of  the mind when agitated by the great and simple affections of our nature. This object I have endeavoured in these short essays to attain by various means; by tracing  the maternal passion through many of its more subtle windings, as in the poems of the IDIOT BOY and the MAD MOTHER; by accompanying the last struggles of  a human being, at the approach of death, cleaving in solitude to life and society, as in the Poem of the FORSAKEN INDIAN; by shewing, as in the Stanzas entitled  WE ARE SEVEN, the perplexity and obscurity which in childhood attend our notion of death, or rather our utter inability to admit that notion;

      His principal object here is to show what our emotions are in a state of excitement. He does this in a very appropriate and detailed way. His other object is also to show what happens to the mind when agitated by others.

    3. Poet is chiefly distinguished from other men by a greater promptness to think and feel without immediate external excitement, and a greater power in expressing  such thoughts and feelings as are produced in him in that manner. But these passions and thoughts and feelings are the general passions and thoughts and feelings of  men. And with what are they connected? Undoubtedly with our moral sentiments and animal sensations, and with the causes which excite these; with the operations  of the elements and the appearances of the visible universe; with storm and sun-shine, with the revolutions of the seasons, with cold and heat, with loss of friends and  kindred, with injuries and resentments, gratitude and hope, with fear and sorrow

      He is saying a big difference between poets and men are the way they act, a poet thinks and feels without immediate excitement as opposed to others. They also think more.

  2. Sep 2020
    1. opened up fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie.

      According to Marx the connection was that the Bourgeoisie used the newly discovered America to maximize their profit. They made it so the new people coming would need a job and go to them even if the job paid cheaply. However before the end of the Bourgeoisie they did create a lot of new things and did some good other than making their workers poor. They made the US less rural by creating enormous cities in which they were able to make railways and even telegraphs. They did create a base for America in industrializing and making it into what it is today.

    2. The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand

      Marx here does not blame the proletariat for their own position, we see here he even says the bourgeoisie have the upper hand. They already have a head start with the money they had which the middle class did not have. He says, "It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage laborers." This means in order to make cash, they have to work under the bourgeoisie. They cannot make their own cash because they did not receive the head start as their respective bosses did. He also states that the way the bourgeoisie worked they would end up hurting their workers as their companies got bigger instead of helping them. They cannot help that.

    3. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.

      Question: If the rise of the proletariat is inevitable, does that mean they become the new bourgeois? Then does the cycle repeat and there will always be the laborer and the owner?