y own view is that Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung has been too focused on victims in a world that is saturated with them.
Question: What are your thoughts on Neiman's conception of Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung in this conclusion?
y own view is that Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung has been too focused on victims in a world that is saturated with them.
Question: What are your thoughts on Neiman's conception of Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung in this conclusion?
That is, of course, the point: the stones are meant to disturb, make your head and heart stumble.
I found this passage on the controversy and role of stumbling stones interesting. This is an interesting debate because while the stones emphasize victimhood, they also emphasize the individuality and create a physical disturbance that allows each individual to be remembered. This can accomplish something different than larger memorials.
In addition to preparing for creative tension, we might learn from cultural studies that, in reconstituting our field, we will inevitably set up new hierarchies (see Hohendahl 231) and that these new relations must themselves be interro-gated to avoid new orthodoxies
How can the field of cultural studies avoid setting up new hierarchies?
?ne_of the wa?,::t ::e" in the world around us, that is, by namin_g ~nd show1~g J~St what is . th tare inherently relevant to contemporary soc1et1es
This line was interesting to me because it reminded me of some of the ideas of pertaining to last class's discussion of Kilomba and Koepsell's writing. The idea of naming "categories that are inherently relevant to contemporary societies" relates back to the ideas of dominant knowledge and certain voices regulating what is relevant in society and academics. Thus, cultural studies must be careful in its analysis to employ an inclusive, holistic, and interdisciplinary approach.
"bricolage,
bricolage: (in art or literature) construction or creation from a diverse range of available things.