- Sep 2023
-
www.theverge.com www.theverge.com
-
Over half of Joe’s students usually dropped out before the boot camp was finished.
This is very similar to what I see in our current work force being in staffing.
-
Put another way, ChatGPT seems so human because it was trained by an AI that was mimicking humans who were rating an AI that was mimicking humans who were pretending to be a better version of an AI that was trained on human writing.
This is a complicated mess of words. But it's weird to think about how AI really got started
-
Because work appears and vanishes without warning, taskers always need to be on al
- If the work keeps vanishing why would people want to keep doing that job?
-
There may be monthslong demand for thousands of annotators, then for only a few hundred, then for a dozen specialists of a certain type, and then thousands again. “The question is, Who bears the cost for these fluctuations?” said Jindal of Partnership on AI. “Because right now, it’s the workers.
This goes to show the people or workers will always pay the price. Once the job is completed they will be looking for new jobs.
-
o, I thought, because a human cannot wear a photograph of clothing. Wrong! As far as AI is concerned, photos of real clothes are real clothes. Next came a photo of a woman in a dimly lit bedroom taking a selfie before a full-length mirror. The blouse and shorts she’s wearing are real. What about their reflection? Also real! Reflections of real clothes are also real clothes.
As he goes through this you can see the way AI thinks about certain things. Yes a picture of a person wearing a dress is considered real. Very interesting
-
All items below SHOULD be labeled because they are real and can be worn by real-life humans,” it reiterated above photos of an Air Jordans ad, someone in a Kylo Ren helmet, and mannequins in dresses, over which was a lime-green box explaining, once again, “DO Label real items that can be worn by real people.”
in a way AI is kind of right, but also you can tell it needs work and data to be added correctly.
-
Human intelligence is the basis of artificial intelligence, and we need to be valuing these as real jobs in the AI economy that are going to be here for a while.”
As stated earlier I think human will always have a presents but it will be less and less over time.
-
Others are looking at credit-card transactions and figuring out what sort of purchase they relate to or checking e-commerce recommendations and deciding whether that shirt is really something you might like after buying that other shirt.
How do they get credit card data? Should we be concerned?
-
You collect as much labeled data as you can get as cheaply as possible to train your model, and if it works, at least in theory, you no longer need the annotators.
I think a lot of companies use this idea and have very many years. It is the core principle to making more money. But do all of the theories pan out?
-
he current AI boom — the convincingly human-sounding chatbots, the artwork that can be generated from simple prompts, and the multibillion-dollar valuations of the companies behind these technologies — began with an unprecedented feat of tedious and repetitive labor.
It's amazing how simple jobs can turn into multimillion dollar projects.
-
In todays market at my job you can't find anyone to work for less than $12/hr. Much less someone working for $1.25/HR. Especially a college graduate.
-