31 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2013
    1. SHE ought not to be an Ignorant, Stupid, Indolent, or a dull Person; and especially not incapable of conceiving Matters distinctly, or judging of Things aright: Neither ought she be a Self-Indulger, Slothful, or Lazy; nor a Light, Dissolute, or Daring Person: She ought not to be inconsiderate, negligent, or forgetful; nor proud, passionate, or obstinate: Neither peevish, morose, or surly; nor fearful, doubtful, or wavering-minded: neither ought she to be a Tipler or Drunkard, nor a Tatler or Vagabond, nor a covetous, or mercenary Person.

      This whole statement is a true reflection on some of the societal thoughts of women in the eighteenth century. They wanted women to be the perfect balance.

    1. Practice too YOUNG

      I feel that Maubray says for a woman to not start the practice of midwifery too young because he is encouraging the women to get married and have children of their own first. It could also be a fear of competition. If a woman were to start young she would only get better and better at the practice.

    1. Qualifications most requisite and absolutely necessary for WOMEN practising this ART.

      If men and women are practicing the art of midwifery then why is pointing out only the qualifications for women. I feel that this was his way of seeming more knowledgeable at the practice than a woman. Also, why would qualifications be different?

    1. A C C I D E N T S

      I assume that this is in all caps to show that no matter how skilled a physician or midwife may be that all births are prone to accidents. He obviously wants the people who read this to know that if something terrible happens during a birth, it was most likely an accident.

    2. THEIR great Ingenuity and Dexterity in this ART, has

      Midwifery was an art and took lots of skill. However, a man wrote this, so did he use the words ingenuity and dexterity to show how fragile he thought women were.

    1. Of lingering or tedious LABOURS

      All of the labors were very similar, but I sensed that William Smellie knew what he was doing over the midwives. He really focused on the science part of birth which is why he was successful.

    2. A Collection of Cases and Observations in Midwifery (Volume Two) Smellie, William

      William Smellie was an 18th century practitioner and teacher in obstetrics. He was known for his honesty and was credited as being one the the first obstetricians who described the birth process correctly. He was also one of the early pioneers in using forceps. lliam Smellie. The Master of British Midwifery. by R. W. Johnstone Review by: Jane Oppenheimer The Quarterly Review of Biology , Vol. 29, No. 1 (Mar., 1954), p. 52 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2812400

    1. I ordered her to be undressed, put naked in her bed

      I am not sure why Smellie ordered her to undress but the way he writes it is very abrupt and commanding. It is like he needs to make himself look more masculine.

    2. and kept quiet, that, if possible

      I feel that Smellie is commenting on this to show how he views women. He viewed them as loud and talkative. When he says "if possible", it's as if he is suggesting the woman cannot control herself.

    1. swam up and returned

      I feel that this statement shows lack of understanding about women's bodies. While babies can move in the womb I doubt that they actually swam. Even though Smellie was an educated doctor for that time, but this still shows his true lack of knowledge on the birthing process.

    1. friends seemed anxious and uneasy about the situation

      When Smellie mentions "friends" I assume he means women friends. He mentions their uneasiness and anxiety at the end of this page as well. He does not mention the father being worried or uneasy. I wonder if the emotion of being worried is more feminine?