to many students' knowing that college is “expensive” but having only passing familiarity with family finances.
Parents involement and disccusion in the application process can help the student greatly
to many students' knowing that college is “expensive” but having only passing familiarity with family finances.
Parents involement and disccusion in the application process can help the student greatly
. Lately, though, it appears that freshmen are moving left again, perhaps returning to a dichotomy similar to that of the 1960s and ’70s.
The Universities location, professors, and peers can have an extreme influence on students beliefs.
Other reasons include decreasing support for black students in high schools — many of which have become increasingly resegregated
historically and factually, segregation in school systems limit students potential.
So an extra dollar of income does have a greater effect on a poor child’s odds of attending college than on a rich child’s odds.
the value of money to families of different incomes
encourages someone to clarify or elaborate on a comment.
helps both parties to better understand idea or topic
As May neared its end, some students still didn’t know what it would all cost, and some who did were disappointed.
This final cost typically doesn't include the extra cost of books, dorm supplies, travel and living expensive ect.
After one college puts a golden ticket in your hand, was it foolish to think about going anywhere else?
One must consider what is of the greatest benefit to them- even if its not the obvious choice. They must make a decision based on the factors most important to them.
Still, acceptances don’t guarantee access to higher education.
Many academical strong students earn the opportunity to go to top schools but must decline because of barriers. Why must students work so hard to be accepted only to have to decline or settle for a cheaper option because of financial limitations?
That was more helpful than all the times other people had said, "Oh, you’ll get to A&M!"
Many parents and peers are afraid to tell students that their dream school is out of reach, leading the students to continuing focusing their efforts on a school that more than likely won't work out rather than consider other options.
College counseling, Ms. Morgan had learned, required constant attention to small details, hour-to-hour resourcefulness.
Which just proves how insane it is that she's the only college consulelor at the school.
Some Texas colleges didn’t hold state grants for applicants flagged for verification, which meant that money ran out while some eligible students were scrambling to finish the process.
How do we adress this and ensure grants are distrubuted fairly and effectively?
It’s not just that the process of getting into college grows more stressful—and, consequently, more expensive—with every passing year.
With the cost of act/sat, application fees, and other additional cost, even simply applying to college become costly.
only the wealthiest colleges can admit a lot of students whose parents can’t afford tuition.
Many school's (specifically private universities) scholarship funds are directly affected by donor contribution.
even colleges that used to be known as commuter schools require first- and often second-year students to live in the dorms, even if their families live in the same city.
Although many schools require students to live on campus in hopes this will better accilmate them to the collge life, this requirment from schools is costly. In many cases students cant afford this extra expense. If they are able to find cheaper housing or live at home, why shouldn't they?
he race to be not only better-educated than your peers but also better at being a good person in the world
Interesting how an idividuals ability to recive a higher education can depend on how 'good' of a person they are rather then their grades and academic and extracurricular acccomplishments.
I would have to explain the concept of legacy admissions: the positively pre-modern concept that the right to an élite education is heritable
Is it fair that students who parents priorly attended the instution recive a sigifigantly higher chance of acceptance and scholarships?
I generally like this idea: coverage of many issues could benefit from a naïve but informed view.
This approach limits bias and helps people see the issue from a much simplier view.
The state of Florida bars the use of race in admissions.
Does this bar them from asking an applicants race or only requiring it?
Right now, test takers don’t get to see that score.
I personally do not belive schools should be basing important factors in admission off of a number students are not allowed to see.
The College Board uses all that data — drawn from the U.S. Census, public records, and other sources — to calculate a student’s “Overall Disadvantage Level,” on a scale of one to 100.
Can you accurately determine how disadvantaged someone is based on numbers and statistics?
: Persuading their presidents and boards to support policies and practices that might increase socioeconomic diversity
In terms of educations, shouldn't knowledge, accomplishments, and character of your students be more valuable? not balancing the number of students you get from each socioeconomic back ground.
According to a recent report from the nonprofit EdBuild, predominantly white school districts as a group receive $23 billion more than districts that serve mostly students of color, though both have the same number of students.
Is this a nationally done study? Why are these districts recieving more money?
The majority of the schools targeted in this scheme are selective: The University of Texas at Austin takes four in 10 applicants, and Yale just 7 percent.
Is this a nationally done study? Why are these districts recieving more money?
If you have more specific dreams, the Ivy League holds a near monopoly over the Supreme Court.
Some students desire to go to schools because they know they are more likely to recieve jobs if they graduated from a specific school or program.
Rather than being an inevitable product of the forces of economic history, the professional elite was created, in large part through the efforts of Chauncey, Conant, and their colleagues.
Through one standardized test intended to measure intellegence not seperate us based on it.
He told Chauncey that he was making provisional plans to eliminate the deferment for fathers, which had been sacrosanct even during the Second World War, in order to make more room on the deferment lists for the intellectually gifted.
In this statment he is saying that he places more value over the potetional in the itellectual then a father wanting to be present in raising his child.
in the characteristic hope that science could correct human frailty.
An unrealistic and unacheivable hope.
in those days of minimally selective admissions, scored at or above the cutting score of 70 and so were deferred from the draft
Deferment testing causes students to focuses on the wrong reasons for scoring well- to avoid the draft.
The test itself was to be based on the SAT, but the Selective Service wanted it to be scored -- or, in testing language, "scaled" -- in such a way that the results could be compared with those of the Army General Classification Test given to inductees, a more nakedly IQ-like test.
Establishing the SAT to be comparable with military IQ test jepordizes the autenticity and acurracy of test results.
G is supposed to be immutable, but SAT scores vary demonstrably over time according to the degree of specific preparation for the test.
Test preperation for the SAT only makes the playing field more uneven. Wealthier families are able to pay for tutors who can help raise a student's scores hundreds of points.
It says that what CCJEF is asking is essentially $2 billion more in taxpayer funding to make schools equitable—a sum that would be difficult to raise in a cash-strapped state.
The state would have to deal with the disagreement and backlash from the middle and upper classes because of an increase in taxes that they won't feel the benefits from. Not to mention such tax would only increase stress on poor families. The money needs to be found from another budget or alternative source.
This is mainly because school funding is so local. The federal government chips in about 8 to 9 percent of school budgets nationally, but much of this is through programs such as Head Start and free and reduced lunch programs.
A significant increase in the federal government spending on education also increases their power and say in our publics schools. Many do not like the idea of allowing our government to have an even heavier influence on what our children are learning and becoming. So the question is how do we distribute opportunity equitably with out needing the government to regulate.