I t w o u l d , I think, make things easier i f one treated i t asi f i t belonged w i t h 'kinship' and 'religion', rather than w i t h'liberalism' or 'fascism'.
The way that Anderson treats nationalism is also the way that I've always treated it. Nationalism has been an innate quality that allows one to align and connect with others. Liberalism or fascism delve more into government and treatment of others, which doesn't really encapsulate the prospect of nationality. Kinship and religion definitely fits better because they both connect people in ways that don't apply to personality, or understanding of others within the group.