10 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2025
    1. Prayers to the Virgin and exchanges with God constituted existence through this disciplinary and external ritual of self-oblation, making clear to all present—patients, practitioners, and God—that the power of life rests in his hands, in a world where individual autonomy is not possible or even desirabl

      This quote from the text incapsulates the interconnection between religion and Ecuador's IVF practices. Rather then being separate as North American views do, Ecuadorian practices are heavily reliant on religionand are what make them meaningful. Understanding these rituals as constitutive, rather than symbolic, shifts how we understand religious practice in clinical environments — not as superstition or add-on, but as essential, worthwhile part of the work of making and knowing life.

    1. Lisa Power, co-secretary general of ILGA, states that “mostIslamic cultures don’t take kindly to organized homosexuality, even though malehomoeroticism is deep within their cultural roots! . . . most people are too ner-vous to organize, even in countries with a high level of homosexuality.”

      I find this passage by Lisa Power very Western minded viewed. Although people who are in the LGBTQ in non Western countries such as in Arab countries may alight with Western views, it is not right to say criticize a whole culture. It seems very ignorant to assume this without fully understanding all the major factors. It seems strange to try to assume how the people feel and say a major statement that these countries have a major level of homosexuality when they might not classify themselves as that.

  2. Mar 2025
    1. Liberals sometimes confess their surprise that women did not throw off their burqas after the Taliban were removed from power in Af ghan i stan in 2001.

      The common misconception of the veils being a sign of oppression is clearly highlighted in this statement. This degrades the idea of these women having identity, religious beliefs, and personal choice and unfortunately has been used as a political talking point to degrade the religion of Islam. Women in Western countries such as the United States must understand and be mindful of the major cultural differences. This often ignores the real problems women of muslim areas must go through unfortunetly.

    1. inally, deep into our conversation, she addressed thematter head-on.“During the campaign, he was treatedreally unfairly,”she said. She lamented the“unfair”bar-rage of criticism and jokes directed at Candidate Trumpfrom late night talk show hosts,Saturday Night Live,TheView, and the mainstream news networks. She knew thatthe media always critiques presidential candidates andshe knew, too, that there were plenty of things to critiqueTrump for but the degree to which he was lambasted was“unfair.”“Hillary”didn’t get it nearly as bad as he did.And that unfairness, in her judgment, was part and parcelof a liberal smugness she disdained—this sense thatmany people in Madison have that they’re better thaneveryone else, that they know more than anybody

      In many voter's eyes Trump was set out as the big bad guy. This was done as a tactic by the democratic party, but sometimes it did more harm than good. Trump was able to gain and influence many of the voters by this as he was treated very unfairly. I find this very interesting that in the pursit of trying to take someone down, they are supported more in some cases. This allowed voters such as Candace to see him in a new light and give their vote to him.

    1. One More Reason That Lilly Must Do a Deal, Fast” (E. Sil-verman 2010), it cites figures that point to the crisis faced by the pharmaceu-tical company Eli Lilly (the makers, most famously, of Prozac), and arrives at the definitive conclusion—acquire or be acquired.

      This passage truly highlights the major shift from r and d to m and a in the pharmaceutical industry. failing in the medical field is bound to happen and in pharmacy that is no different. The immense pressure to create a drug to help people often causes them to switch to m and a. By shifting to a m and a format, less jobs are available and new drugs will less likely be made. Patents protect these companies and they are able to make massive profits with no risk. This is very negative to the consumers who need the drugs.

  3. Feb 2025
    1. Interestingly enough, the biggest ones that complain the most and refuse are the African- Americans. khiara: Really?rose: Absolutely. I can’t— I don’t know why. I just think it’s sort of an entitlement thing that comes with being a New York Medicaid recipient. Th ey sort of fi gure that they’re special

      I found this comment from Dr.Rose very alarming. The generalization of many groups she listed before hand, such as Hispanic and Bangladeshi, and creating a label on these groups causes a change in the way people will treat them. As a teacher to her medical students, she should keep bias and stereotypes away from the medical field so all patients get equal treatment. This can be very harmful as patients trying to receive treatment of a certain minority will get grouped with people of their own race.

    1. When I was an intern, my mentor and I encountered a case of post-childbirth heatstroke. I asked my mentor why he didn’t help. He told me that I was too naive—we weren’t supposed to interfere unless invited by the Western doctors who were in charge. )at patient died.

      It is very surprising that medical team do not use all their tools such as Chinese medicine that could potentially help patients with their problems. If they are able to help I believe they should try in all their power to help the said patient. This make it seems that Western culture looks down upon other cultures and believes they are superior.

    1. In place of this older paradigm we have a new mass health model in which you often have no experience of being ill and no symptoms yourdoctorcan detect, but you or yourdoctor often discover that you are at risk via a screening test based on clinical trials that show some efficacyof a treatment in reducing that risk; you may therefore be prescribed a drug for life that will have no discernible effect on you, and by taking it you neither return to health norare offi-cially ill, onlyat risk.

      In many cases, people are mass consuming these drugs when their problem is not apparent, the are only at "risk." Because the doctor believes they are at risk, they must take a drug for the rest of their life. It is easy to understand why and how big pharma companies grow and grow based off the greed and money from their consumers. This is a major problem that needs to be resolved as people are taking drugs they don't need sometimes and getting their money taken. Rather then addressing the root problem of the illness, they address the risk. This draws the question of if the medical system and big pharmaceutical companies are really there to help the American people or just to get your money and profit. This creates a major mistrust in American healthcare.

    1. The hospital in Belem do Nordeste functioned without a qualified medical staff (and often without running water as well) for most hours of the day and night, and the patients, both young and adult, were treated largely by untrained practical nurses with the assistance of hospital orderlies, who, when they were not washing floors, helped to deliver babies and suture wounds

      In the United States and many other developed countries people take for granted the accessibility to quality health care. In many countries around the world this is extremely rare, such as in this case in Belem do Nordeste. Most of the medical personnel are not qualified enough to provide the proper care due to the lack of education. Because of this many patients are not getting treated properly which leads to a decreased healthy life. Reflecting on the experiences many impoverished communities suffer from, I am extremely grateful to have to healthcare tools in my area.

  4. Jan 2025
    1. In the early years, ethnographers were interested in exploring the entirety of a culture. Taking an inductive approach, they generally were not concerned about arriving with a relatively narrow prede-fined research topic. Instead, the goal was to explore the people, their culture, and their homelands and what had previously been written about them. The focus of the study was allowed to emerge gradually during their time in the field. Often, this approach to ethnography resulted in rather general ethno-graphic descriptions. Today, anthropologists are increasingly taking a more deductive approach to ethnographic research. Rather than arriving at the field site with only general ideas about the goals of the study, they tend to select a particular problem before arriving and then let that problem guide their research. In my case, I was interested in how undocumented Mexican immigrant youth in Minnesota formed a sense of iden-tity while living in a society that used a variety of dehumanizing labels such as illegal and alien to refer to them. That was my research “problem,” and it oriented and guided my study from beginning to end. I did not document every dimension of my informants’ lives; instead, I focused on the things most closely related to my research problem.

      It is very interesting to see the difference in the past and present ethnographers and their different approaches to exploring a culture. I think that both inductive and deductive approaches both have meaningful benefits. Having an inductive approach allowed researchers to take in and experience cultures first hand. With the use of the more modern deductive approach, researchers are able to understand and have a deeper understanding before entering the culture. A question I have is if the recent deductive approach carries more bias as they have more understand of the culture and could make more assumptions of its people?