170 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2018
    1. healthy and optimistic disposition toward technological problems whichI hopetheywillsee as challengesrather than foregone conclusions.

      Yes, this class has helped me establish a more positive outlook on technology. What intrigues me the most is that it has been there all along...technology is not a new phenom; I just never really paid attention before.

    2. and to act with enlightened and compassionate self-interest

      Continuing education in Emotional Intelligence has been extremely rewarding. I truly look forward to "mental" growth opportunities.

    3. to learn how to learn

      What a great statement! Taking this class has really helped me understand and see the importance of learning how to learn. Thanks again for showing us the writing tips. One of my biggest fears (writing) is starting to become smaller and smaller as I learn how to learn it!

    4. may even have contributed in some forum or othertheir own thoughts and reflections on the impact of technology at the personal, professional, and social levels.

      This whole 'article' is a great piece!

      There is a lot of discussion around control of current technology and where it is going...ie: the openness of the internet and how our children are exposed, A.I..

  2. Mar 2018
    1. as the Greeks believed and, as we will see, as some philosophers of technology believe today as well.

      A good example/viewpoint of: How does awareness of the history and philosophy of technology frame our relationship to technology?

    2. They remain purely subjective arbitrary choices and no essences guide us.

      This presents a conundrum. Does Feenberg suggest society wanted control and free reign and now that they have it, there is too much freedom for control to actually be applied?<br> ...leading to the 'strange aimlessness' he mentions further down

    3. We have a very different common sense

      This is a thought provoking sentence...I know people's own version of common sense differs but I've never considered a whole society's perception of 'common sense' different from another's. Pretty cool concept

  3. Feb 2018
    1. if society was misbehaving, then it could only be due to the fact that it was not adhering to the natural laws that governthe universe

      hmmm...interesting thought process.

      Consider if humans were backed out of the equation...could we be a technological instrument? Perhaps humans are a byproduct of a tool that nature invented.

    2. Science, in this conte xt, is the methodology by which people learn the ways of nature so that they can, reduce them to consistent principles or rules. Technology, in turn, is the applicationof these rules in specific instances, the purpose being, to transform parts o f t he n a tur a l proc e s s i nto w or ka ble forms o f gr e a te r va l ue, structure, and order than exist in the primal state

      Understand the difference and the relation

    3. could well have pushed the mechanical world view offcenterstageand claimed hegemonyfor itself as a completely neworganizing principle for society.It neverhappened.

      wow. this is really interesting. It makes me want to understand Darwin's real intent

    4. because their self-interest would notconflict withothers.

      Relate back to Newton's three laws. If all the phenomena of nature depend upon certain forces (repel or attract), is Locke's theory realistic?

    5. the natural laws ofsociety were being violated becausethe social order was built upon irrational traditions and customs that originated from the theocentrism that had ruled the world for so long.

      Do we act today based on this origination or is it 'human nature' to continue building on irrationality?

    6. John Locke brought the workings of government and society in line with the world machine paradigm, and Adam Smith did the same with the economy.

      VIP. contributions to society

    7. or the Greeks, the science of learning was intended to ask the metaphysicalwhy of things; Bacon on the other hand thought that a science of learning should be committed to the how of things.

      Perhaps my thinking is simple but it seems the history of the learning and understanding of technology (or anything really) generally starts with what and why. As more information becomes readily available, the how is investigated.

      Not necessarily that this thought process is correct...it seems a realism though (who, what,when, where and how...)

      My point being: why would Bacon be so harsh on the ancient Greeks..I mean they were behind the learning curve in a natural (timeline) kind of way

    8. Paean

      Please provide context of the meaning-I cannot grasp the meaning by the sentence structure. (Used as a noun-Greek god?)

      1. any song of praise, joy, or triumph.
      2. a hymn of invocation or thanksgiving to Apollo or some other ancient Greek deity.

      dictionary.com

    9. Machine Age

      I don't know how reliable the sources are but I included this so I could wrap my head around the period names and associated dates:

      The mechanical age is when we first start to see connections between our current technology and its ancestors. The mechanical age can be defined as the time between 1450 and 1840. A lot of new technologies are developed in this era as there is a large explosion in interest with this area.

      The electromechanical age can be defined as the time between 1840 and 1940. http://openbookproject.net/courses/intro2ict/history/history.html

      The Machine Age is an era that includes the early 20th century, sometimes also including the late 19th century. An approximate dating would be about 1880 to 1945. Considered to be at a peak in the time between the first and second world wars, it forms a late part of the Second Industrial Revolution. Wikipedia.com

    10. those who sketch out theblueprint that the rest of us end up filling in.

      When I read this I perceived the analogy to be: those who lead and those who follow (or those who design and those who carry out the work)

    1. Some degree of respect for manual labor is, along with activism, integral to massive technological development.

      Good for class discussion. Relates to Christianity's 'purpose' or philosophy on life as discussed in the beginning of paper.

    2. The slight but significant differences between Greek and Latin piety in this period help not only to make historically intelligible the accomplishment of the medieval West in technology but likewise to expose the psychic foundations of our modern technology which rests on that achievement

      Good conclusion/relates back well to introduction

    3. During the Middle Ages, both Eastern andWestern, this new religion was the essential novelty and stimulus to innovation as well as to the decay of some forms of creativity which had thrived in the Greco-Roman world. It is therefore, not surprising that so many religious and parareligious phenomena illuminate both the high rate of technological advance in the West, and, by contrast, its slow pace in the Byzantine world.

      Good summary

    4. No more profound reversal of the peasant's relation to the land can be imagined. Formerly he had been part of nature; now he became an exploiter of nature.

      VIP

    5. As early as the sixth century a new heavy plow began to spread from the Slavic East.

      as discussed in class-important event that changed the course of history

    6. Man and nature are two things, and man is master. Technological aggression, rather than reverent coexistence, is now man's posture toward nature.

      VIP. Good for class discussion

    7. About 1450 European intellectuals began to become aware of technological progress not as a project (as indicated above, this came in the late thirteen th c entury) but as an histo ric and happ y fact,

      Again, another major shift in the philosophy of technology

    8. development of their respective technologies. The Greeks have generally held that sin is ignorance and that salvation comes by illumination. The Latins have asserted that sin is vice, and that rebirth comes by disciplining the will to do good works. The Greek saint is normally a contemplative; the Western saint, an activist.

      Incredible summary of (justifying) the why behind technological advancement or the lack thereof in relation to beliefs

    9. an element of Christian compassion motivating the development of power machinery and labor-saving devices

      interesting information...technology arises from many motivators

    10. Christianity, by destroying classical animism, brought about a basic change in the attitude toward natural objects and opened the way for their rational and unabashed use for human ends

      VIP

    11. Christianity obviously is not essential to technological dynamism. What Benz suggests, nevertheless, is that Christianity provided, historically in Europe, a set of assumptions, a cultural climate, unusually favorable to technological advance.

      VIP

    12. especially of the anti-technological impulses in Zen—led him to find the genesis of Europe's technological advance in Christian beliefs and attitudes.

      Again we see a differences in the philosophy of technology.

      I had no idea the valuable relation between Christian beliefs and Western technology. This is a big eye-opener for me.

    13. Occidental third of the Middle Ages generated what we call the modernworld.

      VIP.

      Also very important differences in the philosophy of technology between East and West

    14. we shall never see an end of finding them.

      Good relation back to White's second paragraph... the ongoing process of discovery and 'the sort of problem that does not stand still'

    15. sang the praises of the recent invention of invention

      "Religion's" acceptance of technology. Backing by the church -which held much power

      Major development, consider if the church had gone another direction!

    16. Technicians at that time in large numbers

      Again, a social acceptance of this new job growth area (similar to how IT took off a few decades ago and the market grew)

    17. "the invention of invention"

      Great term!!!

      Inventions are the new "it" everyone, it's socially accepted, now start making stuff! Basically social acceptance and the beginning of a new age of enlightenment (?)

    18. From the later Middle Ages onward, world technology was increasingly European technology.

      Remember the first paragraph referring to the establishment of facts as a process...

      Now consider how the information in this sentence ties in to current politics and the dominating countries of the world. What role did technology play?

    19. Moreover, modern technology is the extrapolation of that of the Western Middle Ages not merely in detail but also in the spirit that infuses it.

      VIP.

      spirit=essence

    20. Romans had been no less predatory than were Europeans of the late Middle Ages, but the Caesars were so ill equipped that they could not extend their rapacity greatly beyond the basin of the Mediterranean.

      As discussed in class. This is a major turn of events. Limited resources held the Romans back while others were forging ahead with inventions.<br> Would the Roman empire be considered what we call third world nowadays due to (lack of) technological structure/advancement relative to the Occident and other factions?

    21. by enlarging the number of craftsmen skilled in making and correlating moving metal parts in machines

      capitalizing on human resources and technology gave way for the West to take the lead

    22. but particularly after 1200, Europe led in the development of ship design and the nautical arts.

      Another major event in technological advancement.

      Although the timeline is stretched out, we can clearly see the progression. It started with agriculture, advanced to warfare, then on to mechanical and power products, and then to ship design. We see exploration and the 'continuous search for more'.

    23. Only contemporary China—from which the West borrowed much—could compare with Europe in inventiveness and eagerness for useful novelties.

      Interesting to note in comparing rates of progress

    24. the West produced new labor-saving mechanical devices and explored new applications of power to production, thus providing the industrial basis for burgher capitalism.

      VIP

    25. It is much more often a process of gradual illumination of the fact to be explained by gathering around it other facts that,

      Shows need for flexibility due to variability. Not a simple cause and effect process.

    1. These innovations caused a rapid increase in population and an agricultural surplus that permitted the growth of towns

      Here, we see this almost mutualistic nature of technology and society.

      1. Social collapse happens
      2. New technology is produced (i.e. horse harness, triennial crop rotation)
      3. Towns start to develop
      4. Structure and growth reemerge.

      Again, we see the chicken and the egg concept; or thought of another way, this pattern of "wash, rinse,repeat"

    2. based on it not standing up to the historical evidence.

      Why did the author introduce debunked information here? Was the intent to show the existence of technology and it's perceived theoretical impact to the shape of history?

    3. the collapse of an elaborate city-state culture

      The time period was considered dark -not due to the lack of technology but to the lack of cultural structure to support that technology?

    4. innovating, but not generating a technological revolution of their own

      Reference section 1.6 Marquit: Technology and Societal Development. Arabic relation to classical Greek's technological blockage

    5. scientific and technological

      The author is embracing a difference between the two..it will be interesting to fully understand the relationship between them as well.

    6. Interest in mathematics developed among Church scholars because the Church calculated the date of Easter by combining the lunar cycle with the solar year on the basis of the Ptolemaic geocentric model of the heavens.

      Interesting comment. Discuss in relation to Nye's statement in his article Can we Define Technology?: "Necessity is often not the mother of invention. In many cases, it surely has been just the opposite, and invention has been the mother of necessity"

    7. the growing application of a variety of mechanical devices to manufacturing contributed to an interest in the representation of spatial relationships.

      Consider significance

      What types of jobs did this produce? Downstream effects...

    8. Increasing artisan and merchant activity

      Keep in mind reference from Marquit section 6.1

      Aristotle's message: "some should rule and others be ruled". Artisans, in classic Greece, were considered slaves or foreigners. Here we see some development from that line of thinking.

    9. White asserts that the introduction of the foot-stirrup in the Frankish kingdom of the eighth century immediately changed the nature of warfare.

      Interesting assertion; powerful impact.

    1. The first of these is the distinction between what the Greeks called physis and poiêsis.

      VIP. Aristotle sought out the definition of "physis" to prove that there was more than one definition of "physis", and more than one way to interpret nature. "Though Aristotle retains the ancient sense of "physis" as growth, he insists that an adequate definition of "physis" requires the different perspectives of the four causes (aitia): material, efficient, formal, and final."[6] Aristotle believed that nature itself contained its own source of matter (material), power/motion (efficiency), form, and end (final).

      In philosophy, poiesis (from Ancient Greek: ποίησις) is "the activity in which a person brings something into being that did not exist before."

      Poiesis is etymologically derived from the ancient Greek term ποιέω, which means "to make".

      Wikipedia.com

    2. humanity is a laboring sort of animal constantly at work transforming nature.

      Explore other possibilities/philosophies where purpose is not in the form of "labor". What other drivers are out there? Is there a reason for humanity that is not purpose driven?

  4. Jan 2018
    1. a serf is required to perform a day of unpaid labor by a feudal lord

      China's form of slavery. Parallel connection to lack of technology advancement with the Greeks.

    2. It was simpler and cheaper to put slaves to heavy work than to construct machines to do it

      Has this theory changed? If so, how does it limit our potential today?

    3. superior military technology

      Leads to power. Continues the trigger of events in understanding why we are where we are now.

      Consider: Technology as a natural process of evolution

    4. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of the goods became symbolically separated,

      Impact on today's society? Signs, signs, everywhere signs,,

      FIVE MAN ELECTRICAL BAND "Signs"

    5. may have been the first specialists separated from agriculture who did not raise their own food and were not part of the ruling bureaucracy

      Emergence of "blue-collar class?"

    6. since the rituals to a large extent are considered necessary components of the technology.

      Interesting sentence. Consider how this applies to (management) today.

    7. simple foraging as “a high mobility and movement to resources” and complex foragingas a “collecting strategy in which greater residential permanence is maintained through storage and logistical acquisition of resources

      Concepts of short-term and long-term planning emerge. Change from living in the moment to living for the future?

    8. increase in production above the subsistence level, but also in the emergence and deepening of social stratification within the population

      Consider how a surplus in production above subsistence levels contributed to beginning of what is considered our current economy.

      How did this ability modify downstream behavior?

    9. It is for this reason that many social philosophers reject the sociobiological views asserting that humans are genetically conditioned to be aggressive and acquisitive.

      Interesting class discussion to have. Explore further/consider impact ideas as they relate to technology and other areas.

    10. Toolmaking, development of the hand, socialization of food consumption, increasing differentiation in vocal communication, and mental development move forward in the evolutionary process as an integrative whole, a development in one area contributing to the development of the others.

      Example of evolution in progress and process. This is how the framework of society and technology advancement is established.

    11. The unique character of human toolmaking and tool use along with the uniqueness of bipedality suggests these two factors as the primary stimulus for the evolution of the modern human being

      VIP

      Suggested primary stimulus of our evolution

    12. so that it is not unreasonable to assume (even without evidence) that the early bipedal hominids not only did not lag behind thepongids in toolmaking, but also had begun to advance in their use of tools.

      New concept to explore. Impact on today and future? What-if scenarios would be interesting conversation. Still potential for this concept to advance further?

    13. historical sequence of key stages of human societal developmen

      Good tactic to look back and understand how we got here with technology. (Conversely?), a philosophical outlook will help us see the possibilities ahead. A holistic view allows for a "look back, look now and look ahead" approach to technology and its advancement.

    14. TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENTA principal concern of philosophy of technology is how technological development influences the course of societal interrelationships at different stages of societal organization, as well as how specific stages of societal organization and culture affect technological development.

      VIP. Main topic: define/discuss relationship between technology and society. Consider chicken/egg theory: after (centuries), there is still no answer. Excerpt from a draft of my first capstone writing is below. I feel the correlation between the chicken and egg has similar parallels to technology and society.

      'One can argue both chicken and egg are team members in the success of species survival and the success of the world’s poultry industry. Disregard which comes first, the chicken produces and nurtures the eggs, the eggs produce more chickens and the race of the species not only continues but multiplies exponentially. This leaderless team share great productivity success for the business stakeholders as demonstrated by the historical consumption rate of poultry in the United States.'

    1. Should we accept such determinism

      Do we have a choice?

      Technological determinism is a reductionist theory that assumes that a society's technology determines the development of its social structure and cultural values. (Wikipedia.com)

    2. In a single author's writing, the term could serve as both cause and effect, or as both object and process.

      VIP. Refer back to definition of technology. Tech as a tangible as well as an application of scientific knowledge

    3. the meaning of "technology" remained unstable in the second half of the twentieth century, when it evolved into an annoyingly vague abstraction

      True! vague abstraction

    4. search of prominent American periodicals shows that between 1860 and 1870 "technology" appeared only 149 times, while "invention" occurred 24,957 times.

      Wow. Fun fact

    5. Often the use of tools and machines has preceded a scientific explanation for how they work or why they fail.

      Is society numb to the why of technology? Do we take tools and machines for granted?

    6. The existence of a tool also immediately implies that a cultural group has reached a point where it can remember past actions and reproduce them in memory

      Good sentence to discuss together.

    7. I do not propose to develop a grand theory of how human consciousness evolved in relation to tools

      Interesting sentence. Much of first page is devoted to discussion on this topic (maybe a broader subject than he can tackle here?)

    8. echnologies are not just objects but also theskills needed to use them

      New idea for me. Eye opening. Always considered technology as tangible. Dictionary.com states technology is the branch of knowledge.

      technology as a "thing" versus technology as an application of scientific knowledge. VIP

    9. mental projection of a sequence, including an initial desire, several actions, and successful feeding. The sequence becomes more complex when more tools are involved, or when thesame tool is used in several ways. Composing a narrative and using a tool are not identical processes, but they have affinities. Each requires the imagination of altered circumstances, and in each case beings must see themselves to be living in time. Making a tool immediately implies a succession of events in which one exercises some control over outcomes. Either to tell a story or to make a tool is to adopt an imaginary position outside immediate sensory experience. In each case, one imagines how present circumstances might be made different

      Could one argue ants, birds and bees understand the need and end result of their project? Building a nest, or building a magnificent underground community "implies a succession of events in which one exercises some control over outcomes".

    10. necessities

      Interesting phrase. Who/what defines human perception of necessities?<br> Proof that necessity is not the mother of invention? Proof that tools exist before the problem to be solved? What evidence is this based on?

    11. and one might argue that humanity fashioned itself with tools.

      Terrific point author is making...refers back to first sentence in paragraph linking relationship between humans and tools.

    12. it did so with forethought.

      Implies forethought is a requirement for technology?

      Consider relation to unintended consequences from tech advancement...no forethought required.