An antiracist analysis would make clear that the problem is not the group, but the policies that put racial groups at a distinct disadvantage.
I think this an important distinction to make. When you ignore these policies you actively choose to be ignorant of injustices which can propel racist ideas even further.
This incisive definition forces the reader to hold themselves accountable for their ideas and actions.
I think this can be hard to fully get through one's head because it's extremely difficult to admit to oneself that one may be in the wrong or in need of change. I think in general, one of societies greatest flaws is our inability to hold ourselves accountable. It's easier to point out others' shortcomings. A great example is cancel culture. Many are quick to point a finger but won't admit that they also may need to change their own ways.
Or are we just being gaslighted by big corporations and the “sustainable development” movement?
This is an interesting question because while I believe there is some truth to this I also believe that this idea is more cyclical. Politics play a big role. The green party brings forth the issue of climate change and how big corporations need to become more sustainable. Society sees these issues brought up and want to know how they can help through everyday choices. This pushes these corporations to become more sustainable whether it government regulations pushed by voters or just societal pressures. While we are most likely being gaslit, I do believe that we as society are also propelling a cycle that pushes more sustainable practices.
People are given the apparent option of concretely “doing something” against the abstract and overwhelming danger of the climate crisis — without the need for radical change.
I think so many people participate or try to participate in sustainable consumerism is because they fear the idea of climate change without putting in the work to research ways they can actually help. Sustainable consumerism is a safe way they can easily feel apart of something without drastically changing their lifestyle. However, although criticism for this phenomenon can be valid, I think it sometimes doesn't account for the fact that many of those who participate in sustainable consumerism are of younger generations who don't necessarily have the funds or means to donate, vote, or protest.
flexibility and adaptability.
Flexibility and adaptability are as stated, "what we will need in the future," I think this is a hard pill to swallow because of how uncompromising society can be about the issue of climate change. Try as we might but in the age of social media, "fake news," and polarizing politics, getting society to be flexible and to adapt is a feat.
Most archaeologists now look at situations of “collapse” like these and see flexibility and adaptability. While some things end, other things persist. This continuity can be more impressive and important than the disappearance of certain elements from the archaeological record.
I think this is an interesting statement because having a perspective that focuses on what persists while ignoring what ends shines light on what is strong and can help to make predictions for the future